The Top Six and the utter failure of IDiocy

[RonO]

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/talk.origins/L21KpMBQEXk/x8R6s8qoEAAJ

Yes, this is the same link that Nyikos misused in his thread.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/talk.origins/hmhr1Ppyvi4/qy1Yg4zrAwAJ

It is just one of the links where I list links to the Top Six and
describe the state of IDiot denial about them.

It demonstrates that Nyikos doesn't have a clue about what he is talking
about, and his stupid lies are just, well, stupid at this point. He is
just the asshole that everyone knows him to be.

The saddest thing is that I have never tried to get the IDiots to
support the Top Six. I have simply tried to get them to acknowledge
that the Top Six exist, and to understand what the Top Six are. Really,
no IDiot on TO can face the Top Six as the Top Six. Dean restated the
TOP Six and asked for other IDiot help in dealing with them, but not a
single IDiot helped him out. He forgot that he could not deal with them
and started putting them up one at a time to lie to himself about them,
but he quit when I reminded him of what he could not deal with.

My entire post to Glenn in the OoL thread:
Why keep lying? Why not deal with the Top Six? Of what use is going
back to the ID perps for second rate junk that has never amounted to
anything in decades and run from the best that they have to give you?

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/talk.origins/L21KpMBQEXk/x8R6s8qoEAAJ
END REPOST:

Really, where did Nyikos get my link to the Top Six and what would make
the asshole lie about something so stupid?

The Top Six are just the best "evidence" that the ID perps can come up
with for IDiocy and no IDiot on TO can face the Top Six as the Top Six.
The ID perps call it their best evidence and bend over backwards to not
claim that it is scientific evidence. Really, read their stupidity on
each of the Top Six. They are very careful to never claim that the junk
is scientific evidence for IDiocy. It is just the best evidence that
they have and no IDiot can deal with them. IDiots can lie to themselves
about one at a time like MarkE is currently doing, but they can't allow
themselves to learn anything from the Top Six in order to keep lying to
themselves.

There never was a challenge for IDiots to defend the Top Six. The
challenge to existing IDiots is to just deal with the Top Six in a
logical and competent manner. No IDiot is capable of doing that.

These are the Top Six god of the gaps denial arguments that still fool
the rubes. They were all used by the Scientific creationists that came
before the ID perps. The simple fact is that the vast majority of
IDiots do not want to believe in the god that would fit in those gaps.
You can see it in how MarkE doesn't even want to put his god in the gap
that he is creating. If he did he would have to acknowledge that there
is no point in trying to demonstrate that such a gap exists or that it
is never going to be anything but a gap because he doesn't even want to
believe that, that gap exists.

Glenn can't even get himself to acknowledge that the Top Six exist. He
will lie about running from the Top Six even as he is running from the
Top Six. There isn't a single post where Glenn has faced the Top Six
since they were put out by the ID perps 2 and a half years ago, but
multiple posts where Glenn will go to the ID perps for second rate junk
that did not make the Top Six to continue to lie to himself about IDiocy.

The simple existence of the Top Six as the IDiot Top Six is what the
IDiots can't live with. They may be the best god of the gaps denial
arguments that still fool the rubes, but they aren't anything that the
vast majority of IDiots want to understand as the Top Six. You don't
see the ID perps putting up their best IDiot model using the Top Six.
All they have done is acknowledge their existence one at a time. They
couldn't even put them in the same post.

Ron Okimoto