Intelligent Design in Abiogenesis? DEBATE | Otangelo Vs Leophilius

[otangel...@gmail.com]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1YWZz4-d0&lc=z23xtfy4szngz3gkyacdp432faw2i4tanutnoausl5pw03c010c.1594430216369541

[RonO]

On 7/11/2020 12:31 PM, otangel...@gmail.com wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1YWZz4-d0&lc=z23xtfy4szngz3gkyacdp432faw2i4tanutnoausl5pw03c010c.1594430216369541
>

I couldn't stand to watch the video after the guy claimed that the next
big event was a debate with a flat earther.

What does it make you feel like to be with such stellar company?

Do you have any evidence that your junk would be more convincing than
what the flat earther would have?

You have never presented any on TO.

Ron Okimoto

[Bob Casanova]

On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:31:15 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in talk.origins, posted by
otangel...@gmail.com:

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1YWZz4-d0&lc=z23xtfy4szngz3gkyacdp432faw2i4tanutnoausl5pw03c010c.1594430216369541

I'd rather be nibbled to death by ducks.

<plonk>
--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov

[Glenn]

You ever debated a flat earther?

[RonO]

You likely lost that one didin't you?

Ron Okimoto

[Glenn]

On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 5:59:59 PM UTC-7, Ron O wrote:
> On 7/11/2020 2:38 PM, Glenn wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 11:54:58 AM UTC-7, Ron O wrote:
> >> On 7/11/2020 12:31 PM, otangel...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1YWZz4-d0&lc=z23xtfy4szngz3gkyacdp432faw2i4tanutnoausl5pw03c010c.1594430216369541
> >>>
> >>
> >> I couldn't stand to watch the video after the guy claimed that the next
> >> big event was a debate with a flat earther.

"Welcome to Modern-Day Debate, a neutral channel aiming to host debates on science, religion & politics on an equal playing field."

> >>
> >> What does it make you feel like to be with such stellar company?

Why is he to be associated with a flat earther? Is he to debate one in the next "big event"?

> >>
> >> Do you have any evidence that your junk would be more convincing than
> >> what the flat earther would have?

Your comparison is disgusting, and you present no evidence to legitimize the comparison.

> >>
> >> You have never presented any on TO.

So you say. You. Should you be regarded as credible?

> >>
> > You ever debated a flat earther?
> >
>
> You likely lost that one didin't you?
>

What one? I didn't say I ever debated a flat earther. I asked you since you apparently think that doing so would make you feel that you were with
"stellar company".

Now you are in Otangelo's company, as well as the youtube channel's company.

I don't think I have lost anything in this one.

[Glenn]

On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 11:54:58 AM UTC-7, Bob Casanova wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:31:15 -0700 (PDT), the following
> appeared in talk.origins, posted by
> otangel...@gmail.com:
>
> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1YWZz4-d0&lc=z23xtfy4szngz3gkyacdp432faw2i4tanutnoausl5pw03c010c.1594430216369541
>
> I'd rather be nibbled to death by ducks.
>
> <plonk>
> --

Now there's a real conversationalist, there.

[RonO]

On 7/12/2020 5:14 PM, Glenn wrote:
> On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 5:59:59 PM UTC-7, Ron O wrote:
>> On 7/11/2020 2:38 PM, Glenn wrote:
>>> On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 11:54:58 AM UTC-7, Ron O wrote:
>>>> On 7/11/2020 12:31 PM, otangel...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1YWZz4-d0&lc=z23xtfy4szngz3gkyacdp432faw2i4tanutnoausl5pw03c010c.1594430216369541
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I couldn't stand to watch the video after the guy claimed that the next
>>>> big event was a debate with a flat earther.
>
> "Welcome to Modern-Day Debate, a neutral channel aiming to host debates on science, religion & politics on an equal playing field."

Nut jobs like Otangelo have a forum there.

>>>>
>>>> What does it make you feel like to be with such stellar company?
>
> Why is he to be associated with a flat earther? Is he to debate one in the next "big event"?

That is just the type of debates they have there. The next up was going
to be a flat earth debate. What's the matter? Did you lose that one?

>>>>
>>>> Do you have any evidence that your junk would be more convincing than
>>>> what the flat earther would have?
>
> Your comparison is disgusting, and you present no evidence to legitimize the comparison.

The comparison is apt. Just look at what Otangelo puts up here, and you
can get an idea of what he put up there.

>>>>
>>>> You have never presented any on TO.
>
> So you say. You. Should you be regarded as credible?

Put up something credible that Otangelo has put up on TO. Use your own
judgement on what is credible to make that decision and it could be amusing.

>>>>
>>> You ever debated a flat earther?
>>>
>>
>> You likely lost that one didin't you?
>>
> What one? I didn't say I ever debated a flat earther. I asked you since you apparently think that doing so would make you feel that you were with

The one that you were talking about.

> "stellar company".

Otangelo fits right in with any flat earther that exist today.

>
> Now you are in Otangelo's company, as well as the youtube channel's company.
>
> I don't think I have lost anything in this one.
>

It is what you lost, but your mind likely doesn't matter in this case.

Ron Okimoto

[Glenn]

On Sunday, July 12, 2020 at 3:59:58 PM UTC-7, Ron O wrote:
> On 7/12/2020 5:14 PM, Glenn wrote:
> > On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 5:59:59 PM UTC-7, Ron O wrote:
> >> On 7/11/2020 2:38 PM, Glenn wrote:
> >>> On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 11:54:58 AM UTC-7, Ron O wrote:
> >>>> On 7/11/2020 12:31 PM, otangel...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1YWZz4-d0&lc=z23xtfy4szngz3gkyacdp432faw2i4tanutnoausl5pw03c010c.1594430216369541
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I couldn't stand to watch the video after the guy claimed that the next
> >>>> big event was a debate with a flat earther.
> >
> > "Welcome to Modern-Day Debate, a neutral channel aiming to host debates on science, religion & politics on an equal playing field."
>
> Nut jobs like Otangelo have a forum there.

Nut jobs have a forum here. You're here. You're a nut job.

>
> >>>>
> >>>> What does it make you feel like to be with such stellar company?
> >
> > Why is he to be associated with a flat earther? Is he to debate one in the next "big event"?
>
> That is just the type of debates they have there. The next up was going
> to be a flat earth debate. What's the matter? Did you lose that one?

The "type"? You criticize a site without any evidence at all, and for no good reason. Now you pretend I debated a flat earther. The debate you hate also had a defender of your persuasion. Is he a nutjob because he debated on a nutjob video site with a nutjob? I anxiously await your response. Uh huh uh huh.

>
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you have any evidence that your junk would be more convincing than
> >>>> what the flat earther would have?
> >
> > Your comparison is disgusting, and you present no evidence to legitimize the comparison.
>
> The comparison is apt. Just look at what Otangelo puts up here, and you
> can get an idea of what he put up there.

You have neither put up nor shut up in years. At least there is such a place as "Modern-Day Debate". You make a mockery out of even the concept. You've proven that.

>
> >>>>
> >>>> You have never presented any on TO.
> >
> > So you say. You. Should you be regarded as credible?
>
> Put up something credible that Otangelo has put up on TO. Use your own
> judgement on what is credible to make that decision and it could be amusing.

Clearly I need not "put up" anything for you to amuse yourself. You're more than happy to make accusations and claims without the slightest regard for evidence.

>
> >>>>
> >>> You ever debated a flat earther?
> >>>
> >>
> >> You likely lost that one didin't you?
> >>
> > What one? I didn't say I ever debated a flat earther. I asked you since you apparently think that doing so would make you feel that you were with
>
> The one that you were talking about.

You think I referred to myself somewhere in your tangled mess of a mind?

>
> > "stellar company".
>
> Otangelo fits right in with any flat earther that exist today.

Even if that were true, which it isn't, has nothing to do with the youtube site.

>
> >
> > Now you are in Otangelo's company, as well as the youtube channel's company.
> >
> > I don't think I have lost anything in this one.
> >
>
> It is what you lost, but your mind likely doesn't matter in this case.
>

I haven't lost anything, and you haven't shown or even identified I have, and my mind is not an issue in this thread. Yours is.

You're nuts.

[RonO]

On 7/12/2020 6:26 PM, Glenn wrote:
> On Sunday, July 12, 2020 at 3:59:58 PM UTC-7, Ron O wrote:
>> On 7/12/2020 5:14 PM, Glenn wrote:
>>> On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 5:59:59 PM UTC-7, Ron O wrote:
>>>> On 7/11/2020 2:38 PM, Glenn wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 11:54:58 AM UTC-7, Ron O wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/11/2020 12:31 PM, otangel...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb1YWZz4-d0&lc=z23xtfy4szngz3gkyacdp432faw2i4tanutnoausl5pw03c010c.1594430216369541
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I couldn't stand to watch the video after the guy claimed that the next
>>>>>> big event was a debate with a flat earther.
>>>
>>> "Welcome to Modern-Day Debate, a neutral channel aiming to host debates on science, religion & politics on an equal playing field."
>>
>> Nut jobs like Otangelo have a forum there.
>
> Nut jobs have a forum here. You're here. You're a nut job.

You are sort of here, but are such a nut job that most of the time you
might as well not be here.

>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does it make you feel like to be with such stellar company?
>>>
>>> Why is he to be associated with a flat earther? Is he to debate one in the next "big event"?
>>
>> That is just the type of debates they have there. The next up was going
>> to be a flat earth debate. What's the matter? Did you lose that one?
>
> The "type"? You criticize a site without any evidence at all, and for no good reason. Now you pretend I debated a flat earther. The debate you hate also had a defender of your persuasion. Is he a nutjob because he debated on a nutjob video site with a nutjob? I anxiously await your response. Uh huh uh huh.

Bogus junk debates that amount to nothing because the subjests are so
stupid.

You are the one that put up the claim. Go back up and see. You are the
one that asked about it as if you had done it yourself. If you had not
done it yourself, why would you have expected me to have done it?

>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have any evidence that your junk would be more convincing than
>>>>>> what the flat earther would have?
>>>
>>> Your comparison is disgusting, and you present no evidence to legitimize the comparison.
>>
>> The comparison is apt. Just look at what Otangelo puts up here, and you
>> can get an idea of what he put up there.
>
> You have neither put up nor shut up in years. At least there is such a place as "Modern-Day Debate". You make a mockery out of even the concept. You've proven that.

Why lie to yourself about reality. You are the one that never defends
the junk that you put up. One liners don't add up to much. Projection
is so sad when it comes out of someone so lost and out of it.

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/talk.origins/WRzBOU2M-5w/-_OSMVUIAwAJ

You should not have forgotten running away from this. Why don't you
ever put up the evidence that would support the second rate junk that
you put up from the ID perps? I routinely put up the science that
supports what I claim. You know that for a fact because all you do is
run from that reality.

>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have never presented any on TO.
>>>
>>> So you say. You. Should you be regarded as credible?
>>
>> Put up something credible that Otangelo has put up on TO. Use your own
>> judgement on what is credible to make that decision and it could be amusing.
>
> Clearly I need not "put up" anything for you to amuse yourself. You're more than happy to make accusations and claims without the slightest regard for evidence.

Now is your chance to put up or shut up. Projecting your own stupid
behavior onto someone else is dishonest and pretty stupid because you
have to understand what you are in order to do that.

>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> You ever debated a flat earther?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You likely lost that one didin't you?
>>>>
>>> What one? I didn't say I ever debated a flat earther. I asked you since you apparently think that doing so would make you feel that you were with
>>
>> The one that you were talking about.
>
> You think I referred to myself somewhere in your tangled mess of a mind?

You are the one that put it forward.

>>
>>> "stellar company".
>>
>> Otangelo fits right in with any flat earther that exist today.
>
> Even if that were true, which it isn't, has nothing to do with the youtube site.

Yes it does because the guy announced that the next debate was with a
flat earther. What do you not get about the lack of credibility for the
site?

>>
>>>
>>> Now you are in Otangelo's company, as well as the youtube channel's company.
>>>
>>> I don't think I have lost anything in this one.
>>>
>>
>> It is what you lost, but your mind likely doesn't matter in this case.
>>
> I haven't lost anything, and you haven't shown or even identified I have, and my mind is not an issue in this thread. Yours is.
>
> You're nuts.
>

You are just a lazy liar who has to be that way because he can't face
reality. One day you will have to do more than make the lame
accusations. You have had over 2 and a half years to face the Top Six,
but what do you do instead? Going back to the ID perps for second rate
junk that didn't make the Top Six is just a stupid thing to do. Why do
you think that Kalk stopped doing it? It would have to be tragically
insanely bad to make Kalk stop doing it. This post of yours is just sad.

Ron Okimoto

[Glenn]

I never wanted to stop doing it, but now I'm getting old, it isn't as pressing as it once was. Why do you claim that one day I will have to do more?

Do you do more?

[RonO]

Obviously more than you. Stop lying about this junk. It should do you
good to go back and try to support your bogus claims about me. You
would find that you are just wrong. I can't recall the last time that
you were correct about what you just lied about. What you claim may
never have happened. What does that do for you? Really, go back and
think about it and try to come up with a single instance where I have
not been able to support my claims about the ID perps.

Ron Okimoto

[Glenn]

I wouldn't argue with that. I wouldn't even care to comment on that, except to say that Mom may well have been right.

[RonO]

Right about not doing what you should be doing? If you want to keep
lying to yourself about this junk, shouldn't you at least try to be
convincing about it. Just being a pathetically lame liar is not likely
to be something that your mother could have been right about. How
pathetically lame was your lie above about me not supporting my claims
about the ID Perps for years. That was truely a pathetically lame lie.
You knew that it was a pathetically lame lie because you had recently
run from me doing what you claimed that I had not done in years.

Ron Okimoto