info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Where does IDiocy go from here?
36 views
Skip to first unread message
RonO
Nov 13, 2015, 8:14:28 AM11/13/15
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
It has been 10 years since Kitzmiller and intelligent design hasn't
progressed past the bait and switch scam stage that it has been in since
Ohio in 2002. No one ever gets the promised ID science to teach.
The ID perps at the Discovery Institute finally removed the claim that
they had a scientific theory of ID to teach in the public schools from
their education policy back in 2013. 2013 was the last bait and switch
run on both Louisiana and Texas IDiots that wanted to put IDiocy into
textbook supplements.
The ID perps have begun claiming that their junk is good for home
schools and private schools, but no IDiot science lesson plans have
emerged even for home schools, so no one knows what ID science they are
claiming to be able to teach.
The Discovery Institute has started several religious web pages
associating ID with their religious beliefs. So the political scam is
dead and ID isn't going to pass the Lemon test in the future (it never
would have anyway).
The ISCID died in 2008 and the ID Network died in 2009. The ID perps at
the Discovery Institute are pretty much alone in perpetrating the ID
scam as it exists today.
In several past threads the IDiots have had the chance to try to defend
their IDiot alternatives, but no one seems to care enough about such
things to determine what the best IDiot alternative is at this time, so
what is left? No IDiots want to do the science that can be done, and
IDiocy is just that.
Continuing to lie about any possible existing ID science seems to have
gotten pretty stale at this late date, and likely hasn't been viable
since the ISCID kicked the bucket. Really, if there ever was any ID
science why would the IDiot's international science society give up?
So where does IDiocy go from here?
Ron Okimoto
progressed past the bait and switch scam stage that it has been in since
Ohio in 2002. No one ever gets the promised ID science to teach.
The ID perps at the Discovery Institute finally removed the claim that
they had a scientific theory of ID to teach in the public schools from
their education policy back in 2013. 2013 was the last bait and switch
run on both Louisiana and Texas IDiots that wanted to put IDiocy into
textbook supplements.
The ID perps have begun claiming that their junk is good for home
schools and private schools, but no IDiot science lesson plans have
emerged even for home schools, so no one knows what ID science they are
claiming to be able to teach.
The Discovery Institute has started several religious web pages
associating ID with their religious beliefs. So the political scam is
dead and ID isn't going to pass the Lemon test in the future (it never
would have anyway).
The ISCID died in 2008 and the ID Network died in 2009. The ID perps at
the Discovery Institute are pretty much alone in perpetrating the ID
scam as it exists today.
In several past threads the IDiots have had the chance to try to defend
their IDiot alternatives, but no one seems to care enough about such
things to determine what the best IDiot alternative is at this time, so
what is left? No IDiots want to do the science that can be done, and
IDiocy is just that.
Continuing to lie about any possible existing ID science seems to have
gotten pretty stale at this late date, and likely hasn't been viable
since the ISCID kicked the bucket. Really, if there ever was any ID
science why would the IDiot's international science society give up?
So where does IDiocy go from here?
Ron Okimoto
Glenn
Nov 13, 2015, 9:59:29 AM11/13/15
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
"RonO" <roki...@cox.net> wrote in message news:n24nbd$vuk$1...@dont-email.me...
Bob Casanova
Nov 13, 2015, 2:59:25 PM11/13/15
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:57:30 -0700, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by "Glenn" <g...@invalid.invalid>:
The IDiots who espouse it would be chagrined to learn that.
They might even go off in the corner and cry.
--
Bob C.
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
in talk.origins, posted by "Glenn" <g...@invalid.invalid>:
They might even go off in the corner and cry.
--
Bob C.
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
Glenn
Nov 13, 2015, 3:54:26 PM11/13/15
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
"Bob Casanova" <nos...@buzz.off> wrote in message news:26gc4b9u6feptnpt6...@4ax.com...
RonO
Nov 13, 2015, 6:29:25 PM11/13/15
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
Do you even want to try to counter any point that I made?
Reality isn't going to change just because you go into denial. All the
things that I listed have happened. There is no doubt about it. Denial
may be your only out, but it has become pretty pathetic at this point in
time.
How about changing things a bit and proposing some science that might be
done in order to test some testable aspect of your alternative. Go for it.
Ron Okimoto
jillery
Nov 14, 2015, 1:59:26 AM11/14/15
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:51:50 -0700, "Glenn" <g...@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
Apparently some Papal Infallibility has rubbed off on you.
--
This space is intentionally not blank.
wrote:
--
This space is intentionally not blank.
Bob Casanova
Nov 14, 2015, 1:34:24 PM11/14/15
to talk-o...@moderators.isc.org
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:51:50 -0700, the following appeared
question. As usual with your posts.
Meet any good 20-foot-deep fords lately?
>If I call you an idiot you are an idiot.
That statement is "not even wrong", and fails to address the
question. As usual with your posts.
Meet any good 20-foot-deep fords lately?
0 new messages