Re: [sympy] discussion on pull request #1226: decorator is an antipythonic?

[krastano...@gmail.com]

It is mostly my fault that this is stuck. I said that simply using
default named arguments would be a better decision (see discussion on
the pull request page). However if someone else gives a +1 one on this
topic, the PR should be ok for merging.

I would like to implement what I proposed, however I still have not
found the time. It should be quite straightforward, though; just the
usual named arguments stuff.

[krastano...@gmail.com]

Slightly off topic, you have already merged contributions, however I
am not sure that you were added to the AUTHORS file.

[alexandr popov]

You talked me into it =) I implement it "simply" with default argument

(and make another PR). If this implementation will be better, 

it will be possible to abandon decorator.

[alexandr popov]

Yes, you're right. One of PR was merged yesterday.