2.5 and beyond --- punting on higher-order autodiff again

57 views
Skip to first unread message

Bob Carpenter

unread,
Sep 29, 2014, 2:52:54 PM9/29/14
to stan...@googlegroups.com
Since nobody said they're waiting for higher order autodiff,
we're going to punt again on getting it into 2.5 because it
involves an unknown amount of work on fixing forward-mode autodiff
test failures and nobody has any time to dedicate to it.

After the 2.5 release, our biggest priorities are going to be:

* getting higher-order autodiff done

* stiff ode solvers

Higher-order autodiff is blocking most of our research projects
and stiff ode solvers the rest of our research and consulting projects.

I'm also very keen to carve out some time for me to work on improving
the language. Mostly, I'd like to get in R's matrix indexing and
slicing, which I've sketched out an implementation for, but is going
to be a huge pain to code in both the parser, lvalue and rvalue semantics.
That and a compound declare/define statement.

- Bob

Andrew Gelman

unread,
Sep 29, 2014, 9:39:19 PM9/29/14
to stan...@googlegroups.com, Jiqiang Guo, Ben Goodrich
This sounds great. Also let’s not forget to get rstan 2.5 on cran, this will help for various things!
Thx
A
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "stan development mailing list" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to stan-dev+u...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages