You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to spctools-discuss
Hi, everyone. i'm a rookie user of TPP tools through network browser
interface. the instrument i am using is an LTQ orbitrap. when I came
to the "analyze peptide" step, I got confused with the PeptideProphet
option "Use accurate mass binning". I think it can be enabled when
using very small precursor tolerance, such as 5 ppm. But the protrocol
i follow is set precuesor tolerance to 50 ppm and set the filter to 5
ppm through Bioworks interface. Can I enable the "use accurate mass
binning" using the tolerance of 50 ppm??
i appraciate your answers!
David Shteynberg
unread,
Mar 3, 2009, 2:47:53 PM3/3/09
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to spctools...@googlegroups.com
Hi Jun,
You should use the accurate mass model when you are processing data
from high-mass-accuracy instruments (e.g. Orbitrap and FT) and you are
using monoisotopic precursor masses in your search params.
-David
jun
unread,
Mar 17, 2009, 2:59:34 AM3/17/09
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to spctools-discuss
Hi, David
well, I am using an LTQ Orbitrap instrument and set the precursor mass
type to monoisotopic. And I was suggested by a technical support
engineer from ThermoFisher that seeting the precursor tolerance to 50
ppm would be better than just restrcting it to 10 ppm. I was wondering
if this range can fit the conditions for "accurate mass binning"?
thanks for your attention!
-Jun
David Shteynberg
unread,
Mar 17, 2009, 11:52:33 AM3/17/09
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to spctools...@googlegroups.com
Yes.
Gautam Saxena
unread,
Nov 7, 2012, 6:59:40 AM11/7/12
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to spctools...@googlegroups.com, dshte...@systemsbiology.org
If the MS is a linear ion trap and that therefore the precursor tolerance is set to +- 2 Da for OMSSA and +1 and -3 Da for X!Tandem, would "accurate mass binning" still apply? My initial thoughts are no, since those don't seem like high accuracy settings, but I'm not sure I fully understand the use of "accurate mass binning".