SpectraST and stable isotope labels

28 views
Skip to first unread message

Leonard Foster

unread,
Sep 3, 2012, 1:20:37 AM9/3/12
to spctools-discuss
Hi all

I haven't found an answer to my question on this Group or the
SpectraST wiki. Thus, I suspect the answer is 'no' but if not, I'm
hoping someone here can tell me.

The question is, if the spectra for a particular isotopically labelled
form of a peptide does not exist in the spectral library but a
differently labelled form does, can/does SpectraST adapt the spectra
to what would be expected? For example, if LLAGTK (no label) exists in
the spectral library but you have a SILAC-labelled sample (with normal
Lys and D4-Lys) containing LLAGTK, can the algorithm do two searches,
one a direct comparison and the second where all Y-ions are shifted by
4 Da?

Thanks

Tommaso Serchi

unread,
Sep 3, 2012, 9:11:53 AM9/3/12
to spctools...@googlegroups.com, spctools-discuss
As far as I know no. But I might be wrong.

Sent from my iPhone
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to spctools...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to spctools-discu...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en.
>

Eric Deutsch

unread,
Sep 3, 2012, 10:57:33 AM9/3/12
to spctools...@googlegroups.com, Eric Deutsch
Hi Leonard, I think this is what you're looking for:

http://tools.proteomecenter.org/wiki/index.php?title=Software:SpectraST#Se
mi-empirical_Spectrum_Generation

Regards,
Eric
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "spctools-discuss" group.
> To post to this group, send email to spctools...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to spctools-
> discuss+u...@googlegroups.com.

Leonard Foster

unread,
Sep 3, 2012, 6:19:02 PM9/3/12
to spctools...@googlegroups.com, Eric Deutsch
Fabulous Eric, that's exactly what I was looking for! It was generalized beyond the terms I was searching, that must be why I missed it!

Cheers

Leonard
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages