Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
About neo-nazism..
0 views
Skip to first unread message
rami18
May 24, 2017, 10:18:51 PM5/24/17
to
Hello....
About neo-nazism..
Hitler was a national socialist, so he was socialist inside his german
race like is communism, but the defect of nazism is that it is also Race
Struggle of the german race against other races and it is too Class
Strugle of socialism against capitalism, so nazism and neo-nazism is too
much violence like communism. We can not accept there Race Struggle
because of optimization and we can not accept there Class Struggle
because of optimization.
Here is what i have said about the defect of the Race-Struggle:
Immigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI)..
I have done artificial intelligence with PSO and Deep Learning...
So if you are thinking like scientists, you will recognize that
immigration is like artificial intelligence, immigration is
not an exact calculation that must attain a global maximum,
immigration is like PSO in artificial intelligence also, you
can not tune it exactly, but you can enhance it by allowing
more exploration , it is like artificial intelligence of AlphaGO
that has added intuitiveness with a function value that returns
probabilities that has more chance to win, so immigration
is based on usefulness (even if we allow immigration based
on human rights) and usefulness of immigration is not set
as the global maximum of usefulness, but is more optimized
with like heuristics that search for a better optimization,
it is like an heuristic in artificial intelligence of PSO that uses
exploration to better optimize, so immigration is not set as
arabs has to be as beautiful as white europeans , but optimization
of immigration of today has to fulfil the goal of economic growth and
economic efficiency and/or social system efficiency and/or to be able to
give jobs to the right persons, this is how works USA and this is how
works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into
consideration human rights.
And here is what i have said about the defect of Class-Struggle:
About communism..
If you say we have to give more compassion for all to reduce social
Darwinism, this is inferred from the guidance of moral and from a priori
pure moral that says that it is also good inside the set of a priori
pure moral to do so, but this can hurt the economic system, but this is
the way of communism that that lacks optimization, because of
restrictions of empirical moral we have to be more smart and be more
balanced with a priori pure moral and with empirical moral and taking
into account powers and counter powers..
A more correct view of morality:
Please read my following reasoning carefully..
Morality is interpreted by communism as being more ideal morality, this
is the defect of communism, ideal morality belongs to the set of a
priori pure moral of the philosopher Kant, but this ideal morality if
applied today it causes problems, Class Struggle of communism is
inferred from Ideal morality and thus from a priori pure moral, this
violence of Class Struggle of communism is the consequence also
of compassion, because communism wants by compassion to reduce social
Darwinism by using violence of Class Struggle as a tool , but this way
of Class Struggle is understood by empirical moral as being
too problematic to realize because it causes extremism and violence,
so Class Struggle of communism is too much violence that must be avoided.
So a more correct definition of morality must be a mixture of guidance
of moral and a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
About the essence of philosophy
I am still doing in front of you logical reasoning and philosophy..
A logical reasoning can say:
If we are suffering and has difficulty with surviving, and to avoid
suffering and be able to survive, we have to dominate the others to
suffer less and be able to survive.
This is also morality because morality is inferred from empirical moral.
But this was morality of the past that was living in extremely bad or
bad conditions that has concluded with this logical reasoning to enslave
others such as black africans.
But today empirical moral constrains this logical reasoning above with
the balance of powers and counter-powers from where we have also to
infer morality, so please reread carefully what i have said about morality:
Here is how i decompose morality:
1- The guidance of morality
2- All of a priori pure moral
3- Empirical moral
First, there is the guidance of morality that is part of a priori pure
moral, here is what i have said about it:
My wisdom is also inferred from philosophy..
The philosopher Kant has defined morality like a composition
of pure moral and empirical moral, so then morality is
dynamic, not static.
As a proof please read this about the philosopher Kant and you have
to understand it well:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-hume-morality/
But me, i have spoken about pure morality as being happiness
like a reference that is the goal that guides our actions
and philosophies by saying this:
--
The noumenal world of pure morality is a consequence of the essence of
beauty and purity and happiness, this essence of beauty and purity and
happiness causes the essence of respect that is like the essence of law
that compensate by beautifulness for the awfulness of this world, so
pure morality is the light and it attracts us and it guides us also
because the goal of pure morality is the goal of philosophy and this
goal is happiness, but pure morality has attained its goal that is
happiness because of the essence of philosophy, because pure morality is
happiness, so we must respect it and fight for it with wisdom, you have
to have done philosophy like me to understand it correctly.
--
Because morality is composed of a priori pure moral and empirical
moral..But a priori pure moral knows what is the ideal of justice and
the ideal of happiness and the ideal of purity and the ideal of
beauty.. and this essence is the consequence of our essence
that is capable of knowing this essence, and as you have noticed i have
also defined pure morality as happiness, and i have said
that pure morality has attained its goal that is happiness,
i mean that those ideals of justice and happiness and purity and
beauty have been attained by the noumenal world and our thoughts and
this has allowed us to be guided better and this is the light that
attracts us towards a better world, so we must respect it and fight for
it with wisdom.
I have also said about the guidance of morality this:
And how can we be more civilized ?
I have done philosophy..
We have to measure it easily to know about it..
Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is
corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power
that dictates to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the
weakers among us, so then this is corruption of morality that permit us
to measure corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but
i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and
power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is
part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the
degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality
by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our
essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure
civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to
not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love
because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism
and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure
civilization.
This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization.
So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past.
The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness..
If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure,
because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree
of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness,
but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we
constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted
being principles of communism or being principles of social democracy
etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence
responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the principles
of communism because communism is a kind of justice that
is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance
of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt
to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or
social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so
that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not
cause extremism and violence and desorder too.
Second, there is a priori pure moral that we infer from reason.
Third, there is empirical moral, and here is what i have said about it:
About morality..
You will say that morality is morality, we can know it also by feeling it..
But applying morality must be dealt with with wisdom and rationality and
logic..
What says philosophy(read the philosopher Kant) ? that morality is a
composition of a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
So the action of knowing morality by feeling it, is not sufficient,
because it's necessary to infer and apply empirical moral, but is it a
corruption of morality ? since laws are also morality and science
is also morality because we are ruled by optimization of science also,
this is a serious subject, and you are in front of the very important
part of morality that is empirical moral, because morality must be
inferred from powers and counter-powers, this is a weakness of morality,
but what is amazing is that today we are lucky that
morality is not so bad, because read what i have written to
understand my views:
But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce
morality with laws, but morality is not something easy ,
because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality
is inferred also from empirical moral that is also from power and
counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is
not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is
different, we are getting world stability from the power and the
counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is
the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial
and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we
have the counter-power of the consumers confidence index, and this
creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic
systems by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other
than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like
mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more
organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and
extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning
compassion and respect right with social services and medical services
and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid
violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this
compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how
to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index
internationally and locally.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
About neo-nazism..
Hitler was a national socialist, so he was socialist inside his german
race like is communism, but the defect of nazism is that it is also Race
Struggle of the german race against other races and it is too Class
Strugle of socialism against capitalism, so nazism and neo-nazism is too
much violence like communism. We can not accept there Race Struggle
because of optimization and we can not accept there Class Struggle
because of optimization.
Here is what i have said about the defect of the Race-Struggle:
Immigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI)..
I have done artificial intelligence with PSO and Deep Learning...
So if you are thinking like scientists, you will recognize that
immigration is like artificial intelligence, immigration is
not an exact calculation that must attain a global maximum,
immigration is like PSO in artificial intelligence also, you
can not tune it exactly, but you can enhance it by allowing
more exploration , it is like artificial intelligence of AlphaGO
that has added intuitiveness with a function value that returns
probabilities that has more chance to win, so immigration
is based on usefulness (even if we allow immigration based
on human rights) and usefulness of immigration is not set
as the global maximum of usefulness, but is more optimized
with like heuristics that search for a better optimization,
it is like an heuristic in artificial intelligence of PSO that uses
exploration to better optimize, so immigration is not set as
arabs has to be as beautiful as white europeans , but optimization
of immigration of today has to fulfil the goal of economic growth and
economic efficiency and/or social system efficiency and/or to be able to
give jobs to the right persons, this is how works USA and this is how
works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into
consideration human rights.
And here is what i have said about the defect of Class-Struggle:
About communism..
If you say we have to give more compassion for all to reduce social
Darwinism, this is inferred from the guidance of moral and from a priori
pure moral that says that it is also good inside the set of a priori
pure moral to do so, but this can hurt the economic system, but this is
the way of communism that that lacks optimization, because of
restrictions of empirical moral we have to be more smart and be more
balanced with a priori pure moral and with empirical moral and taking
into account powers and counter powers..
A more correct view of morality:
Please read my following reasoning carefully..
Morality is interpreted by communism as being more ideal morality, this
is the defect of communism, ideal morality belongs to the set of a
priori pure moral of the philosopher Kant, but this ideal morality if
applied today it causes problems, Class Struggle of communism is
inferred from Ideal morality and thus from a priori pure moral, this
violence of Class Struggle of communism is the consequence also
of compassion, because communism wants by compassion to reduce social
Darwinism by using violence of Class Struggle as a tool , but this way
of Class Struggle is understood by empirical moral as being
too problematic to realize because it causes extremism and violence,
so Class Struggle of communism is too much violence that must be avoided.
So a more correct definition of morality must be a mixture of guidance
of moral and a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
About the essence of philosophy
I am still doing in front of you logical reasoning and philosophy..
A logical reasoning can say:
If we are suffering and has difficulty with surviving, and to avoid
suffering and be able to survive, we have to dominate the others to
suffer less and be able to survive.
This is also morality because morality is inferred from empirical moral.
But this was morality of the past that was living in extremely bad or
bad conditions that has concluded with this logical reasoning to enslave
others such as black africans.
But today empirical moral constrains this logical reasoning above with
the balance of powers and counter-powers from where we have also to
infer morality, so please reread carefully what i have said about morality:
Here is how i decompose morality:
1- The guidance of morality
2- All of a priori pure moral
3- Empirical moral
First, there is the guidance of morality that is part of a priori pure
moral, here is what i have said about it:
My wisdom is also inferred from philosophy..
The philosopher Kant has defined morality like a composition
of pure moral and empirical moral, so then morality is
dynamic, not static.
As a proof please read this about the philosopher Kant and you have
to understand it well:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-hume-morality/
But me, i have spoken about pure morality as being happiness
like a reference that is the goal that guides our actions
and philosophies by saying this:
--
The noumenal world of pure morality is a consequence of the essence of
beauty and purity and happiness, this essence of beauty and purity and
happiness causes the essence of respect that is like the essence of law
that compensate by beautifulness for the awfulness of this world, so
pure morality is the light and it attracts us and it guides us also
because the goal of pure morality is the goal of philosophy and this
goal is happiness, but pure morality has attained its goal that is
happiness because of the essence of philosophy, because pure morality is
happiness, so we must respect it and fight for it with wisdom, you have
to have done philosophy like me to understand it correctly.
--
Because morality is composed of a priori pure moral and empirical
moral..But a priori pure moral knows what is the ideal of justice and
the ideal of happiness and the ideal of purity and the ideal of
beauty.. and this essence is the consequence of our essence
that is capable of knowing this essence, and as you have noticed i have
also defined pure morality as happiness, and i have said
that pure morality has attained its goal that is happiness,
i mean that those ideals of justice and happiness and purity and
beauty have been attained by the noumenal world and our thoughts and
this has allowed us to be guided better and this is the light that
attracts us towards a better world, so we must respect it and fight for
it with wisdom.
I have also said about the guidance of morality this:
And how can we be more civilized ?
I have done philosophy..
We have to measure it easily to know about it..
Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is
corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power
that dictates to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the
weakers among us, so then this is corruption of morality that permit us
to measure corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but
i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and
power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is
part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the
degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality
by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our
essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure
civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to
not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love
because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism
and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure
civilization.
This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization.
So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past.
The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness..
If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure,
because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree
of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness,
but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we
constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted
being principles of communism or being principles of social democracy
etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence
responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the principles
of communism because communism is a kind of justice that
is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance
of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt
to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or
social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so
that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not
cause extremism and violence and desorder too.
Second, there is a priori pure moral that we infer from reason.
Third, there is empirical moral, and here is what i have said about it:
About morality..
You will say that morality is morality, we can know it also by feeling it..
But applying morality must be dealt with with wisdom and rationality and
logic..
What says philosophy(read the philosopher Kant) ? that morality is a
composition of a priori pure moral and empirical moral..
So the action of knowing morality by feeling it, is not sufficient,
because it's necessary to infer and apply empirical moral, but is it a
corruption of morality ? since laws are also morality and science
is also morality because we are ruled by optimization of science also,
this is a serious subject, and you are in front of the very important
part of morality that is empirical moral, because morality must be
inferred from powers and counter-powers, this is a weakness of morality,
but what is amazing is that today we are lucky that
morality is not so bad, because read what i have written to
understand my views:
But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce
morality with laws, but morality is not something easy ,
because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality
is inferred also from empirical moral that is also from power and
counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is
not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is
different, we are getting world stability from the power and the
counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is
the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial
and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we
have the counter-power of the consumers confidence index, and this
creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic
systems by being responsable by being also responsable governance, other
than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like
mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more
organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and
extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning
compassion and respect right with social services and medical services
and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid
violence and extremism is also more stability and more power , so this
compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how
to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consumer confidence index
internationally and locally.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
rami18
May 27, 2017, 6:10:43 PM5/27/17
to
Hello.........
About neo-nazism..
Hitler was a national socialist, so he was socialist inside his german
race like is communism, but the defect of nazism is that it is also Race
Struggle of the german race against other races and it is too Class
Strugle of socialism against capitalism, so nazism and neo-nazism is too
much violence like communism. We can not accept there Race Struggle
because of optimization and we can not accept there Class Struggle
because of optimization.
Here is what i have said about the defect of the Race Struggle:
Immigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI)..
I have done artificial intelligence with PSO and Deep Learning...
So if you are thinking like scientists, you will recognize that
immigration is like artificial intelligence, immigration is
not an exact calculation that must attain a global maximum,
immigration is like PSO in artificial intelligence also, you
can not tune it exactly, but you can enhance it by allowing
more exploration , it is like artificial intelligence of AlphaGO
that has added intuitiveness with a function value that returns
probabilities that has more chance to win, so immigration
is based on usefulness (even if we allow immigration based
on human rights) and usefulness of immigration is not set
as the global maximum of usefulness, but is more optimized
with like heuristics that search for a better optimization,
it is like an heuristic in artificial intelligence of PSO that uses
exploration to better optimize, so immigration is not set as
arabs has to be as beautiful as white europeans , but optimization
of immigration of today has to fulfil the goal of economic growth and
economic efficiency and/or social system efficiency and/or to be able to
give jobs to the right persons, this is how works USA and this is how
works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into
consideration human rights.
And here is what i have said about the defect of Class Struggle:
About neo-nazism..
Hitler was a national socialist, so he was socialist inside his german
race like is communism, but the defect of nazism is that it is also Race
Struggle of the german race against other races and it is too Class
Strugle of socialism against capitalism, so nazism and neo-nazism is too
much violence like communism. We can not accept there Race Struggle
because of optimization and we can not accept there Class Struggle
because of optimization.
Immigration is like Artificial intelligence(AI)..
I have done artificial intelligence with PSO and Deep Learning...
So if you are thinking like scientists, you will recognize that
immigration is like artificial intelligence, immigration is
not an exact calculation that must attain a global maximum,
immigration is like PSO in artificial intelligence also, you
can not tune it exactly, but you can enhance it by allowing
more exploration , it is like artificial intelligence of AlphaGO
that has added intuitiveness with a function value that returns
probabilities that has more chance to win, so immigration
is based on usefulness (even if we allow immigration based
on human rights) and usefulness of immigration is not set
as the global maximum of usefulness, but is more optimized
with like heuristics that search for a better optimization,
it is like an heuristic in artificial intelligence of PSO that uses
exploration to better optimize, so immigration is not set as
arabs has to be as beautiful as white europeans , but optimization
of immigration of today has to fulfil the goal of economic growth and
economic efficiency and/or social system efficiency and/or to be able to
give jobs to the right persons, this is how works USA and this is how
works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into
consideration human rights.
0 new messages