Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Solution to the Authority Hoax: If it isn't simple, it isn't accurate.

12 views
Skip to first unread message

Rob Hay

unread,
Aug 30, 2009, 1:44:44 PM8/30/09
to
http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/?p=75

Solution to the Authority Hoax: If it isn't simple, it isn't accurate.

Part 1

"Complicated" is a characteristic of either those who do not "know" or
explanations by those who do not want us to "know". "Simple" is always
gentler, smoother, and more concise; ergo, more accurate.

Think of all the subjects which we consider to be complicated; rather, that
we were told are complicated: medicine, law, religion, politics, banking,
etc. Do we really need to know them? Do we even want them in our lives? They
were designed for the purpose of controlling us, yet, we can be controlled
only if we defer to those who claim to be able to interpret them and
"simplify" them for us. From where did they get their information which
allows them to know how to simplify complicated disciplines? Now, that's a
facer, isn't it? It came from the "authorities" who told them that these
subjects were complicated and needed interpretation by someone "in
authority". This is tantamount to "teachers teaching teachers teaching
teachers."

In other words, we were deliberately set-up to believe that there are things
we must know, yet, can't possibly know, unless some "authority" explains it
all to us. So, those of us who fell for this "authority hoax" seek out
doctors, attorneys, bankers, priests, etc. in order to tell us how to run
our lives because all we know are the simple aspects of life: health, love,
kindness, doing what we love to do and serving our fellow man whilst doing
so. There is nothing complicated about those concepts. So, we have been
invited to be dependent upon those who claim to know more about something
about which we neither need nor want. Also, it evidences that we are
continually being conned into believing the main myth - that we separate;
not only separate but also not equal to one another. Weren't we all born
"equal"?

Since I have already exposed the societal weapons of propaganda and control
(medicine, law, religion, schooling, etc.), let's take a look at the
original, deliberate deception.

For years, I refused to use the Bible for legal purposes (or for any
purpose) because I knew it had been so tampered with, re-written, and
altered to suit the agenda of those in control. I continued to hear, "But it
is THEIR law book." I would respond, "Yes, it is THEIR law book, NOT mine."
I knew the entire book was propaganda, fiction and, therefore, inaccurate
because it applied to "them". It had nothing to do with me and I wasn't
about to compromise my integrity by shoving it in their faces any more than
I would bring their statutes, laws, etc. to them, in order to support my
position. None of it had anything to do with my principles. Why would I make
use of or refer to anything that isn't the "truth"?

Note that both "the law" and the entire Bible (except for the first
chapter -1.5 pages) are very complicated. The alleged leaders of all
religions and all law societies do their best to have us believe that we
must go to them for interpretation. Both "Law" and the Bible, apparently,
are not understandable by people like us. The simple truth, of both these,
is that true "Law" and the "word of God" are both extremely simple,
straight-forward, and easy to comprehend for all of us. Those whose intent
it is to complicate both "law" and "the word of God" are doing so for their
own gain. All lawyers, judges, priests, ministers, rabbis, popes, etc. are
in the racket of "professing to know what's true", strictly for profit, not
for prophet. Their intent is to keep everything a big mystery, to be
understood by only them and, hence, we must go to them for council. This
egotistical nonsense is the biggest tip-off that whatever so-called 'truth'
they have to tell us is, indeed, false.

Why would we ever consult anyone or anything other than our higher selves,
(the collective unconscious) for information? Why would we ever think that
someone knows better than we do about our health, our bodies, our spiritual
evolution, our education, and how we are to conduct our lives? Why would we
defer to anyone unless, somehow, they have convinced us that: they know more
about us than we do; - OR - that they have "authority" over us?

But, how can that be?! They must have something to gain . either "money"
or power over us, or both.

KJV Holy Bible

Thanks to my friend, Robert, (freedomfiles.org), I finally grasp the true
purpose of the Bible. I have resisted including the Bible as a solution to
our situation, for several reasons, and Rob has set me straight. Since the
Bible was both written by and edited by men, the entire book is a work of
fiction. Right off the bat, we are dealing with human foibles, memories of
their pasts (we now know "pasts" don't exist, except in the mind), egos,
misinterpretations, perceptions influenced by programmed beliefs and, ergo,
by emotions. At the top of page one, I was stunned to be shown: "The First
Book of Moses called GENESIS". This tells me that this is a story written by
a man the existence of whom we have no proof. YIKES!

But Rob says that there is some truth within the book of fiction (rather
like a biographical novel) and that truth is simple, accurate, and
completely uncomplicated, requiring absolutely no scholarly interpretation,
whatsoever. That truth is in the first chapter, wherein the Creator is
referred to as "God". After Chapter 1, the only "God" mentioned is "Lord
God". Why the change? Weren't we doing rather well with just "God". Didn't
we grasp that "God" meant the one love-light-consciousness which created
all? The fact that the loving, creative "God" disappeared after Genesis,
chapter 1, and an unloving, punishing "Lord God" sprang up to take its
place, is highly suspicious to me. I wish I hadn't resisted the Bible so
vehemently because, now, I know that I would have spotted (had I read it),
the most glaring contradiction which I cannot imagine how everyone else
missed.

If God created man and woman (chapter 1) why did the LORD God have to repeat
the process in chapter 2, by making Adam and Eve? The answer is that they
are not one and the same. God created man and woman and the LORD God created
the fictions. Fictions, as we all know, now, have NAMES! In the Bible all
the fictions are spelt in uppercase, e.g.: LORD, MOSES, JESUS, just as they
are in our present commercial world, because the Bible is a book about
Commerce. Adam and Eve were not Capitalized, for the very reason that they
belonged to, i.e.: were the property of, LORD God, who was the owner and
Master over them. So, now, Christian "names" are spelt the way Adam and Eve
are spelt, in order to deceive us into believing that by altering the
spelling of a name, we can avoid becoming a "living thing", as "living
things" are those who have relinquished their status of "man, created by
God" for a "title" which all names are, regardless of how one spells them.
We must quit identifying with the Name.

Adam and Eve were given Names. God the Creator did not 'name' us. He
lovingly allowed us to BE and, in fact, gave us dominion over the earth and
everything on it. How trusting and kind that God must be! The "Lord God",
however, is the opposite (inverse) and, for the entire remainder of the
Bible (1506 pages), the Lord God is punishing, vengeful, jealous, wrathful
and, hence, must be the entity - perhaps Lucifer or the Lord of the
nunnaki - which gave us the ego mind and began the entire world of fiction,
the belief that we are separate, that there is an authority over us. The
Lord God is the ego mind - the mind of fear, separation, and belief that we
are not equal. This state of mind creates competition and so, what resulted
from that was the Commerce Game. After all, isn't the ego mind the aspect of
us which plays games and which manifests punishing, competition, fear,
belief in separation, and unloving characteristics? It most certainly is
not the spirit mind.

So, it dawned upon me that the Bible, like everything else in existence, has
two parts to it . a duality. Again, I am reminded of the page of Rules in
the game, Monopoly. If we opt to play the game, we must be prepared to
suspend our beliefs about what might be "true" and be prepared to get
clobbered by the Banker, not to mention clobbered by our fellow man, since
the name of the game is to charge our fellow man/players. The only way to
win any game is if everyone else loses.

Just before we begin to play the game, we approach the board knowing we are
friends, knowing that we are more powerful than the game (not vice versa),
and knowing that, when we end the game, we'll all be friends and equal,
again. However, in order to play the game properly, we must forget those
three things. I suspect that those of us who opt to live in love for our
fellow man and maintain our dominion over "all living things" need read no
further than Genesis, chapter 1. If we opt to forget who we are, play the
game of commerce, and behave in unloving, fearful, competitive ways, then,
the entire remainder of the Old Testament, plus the New Testament, are the
laws and rules by which the commerce game is played.

Chapter 1 is about LOVE and the entire remainder of the Bible is LAW. "Where
there is law, there is no love; where there is love, there is no law."
Moses got the 10 commandments from the LORD God, not from God the Creator,
as God the Creator gave us no laws. God the Creator loved us and trusted us
to treat each other lovingly and as equals because it/we knew that we are
all one. We knew who we were, but we forgot.

What about those of us who realize that the game (the complete description
of which is the entire Bible, after chapter one) has caused nothing but
sorrow, loss of self-realization, and the relinquishing of our own personal
power, love, light, and energy to those who control the game. I am not
saying that the remainder of the Bible isn't valuable text; I'm saying that
it applies only to those who want struggle in their lives. The game of
Monopoly is a game of struggle, war against our fellow players, and the bank
never loses. If there is a win, it is an empty win, because neither the
winning nor the losing, of any game, has anything to do with who we are. The
Bible is a great rule book for those who insist upon playing the commerce
game, believe we are separate, and choose law over love, but, for those of
us who are tired of it, we must remember that the only pertinent part which
applies to those of us who want to remain in love and serve our fellow man
from love, is that we have "dominion over all creeping things."

Anyone reading this essay has already discovered that all who relinquish
their status of "man" to that of a titled entity, e.g.: cop, teacher, judge,
doctor, priest, attorney, minister, banker, CEO, etc. i.e.: those who
identify with who they believe themselves to be, as opposed to who they
really are - a creation of a loving consciousness - are a "creeping thing
that creepeth upon the earth", henceforth: "creeps". The creeps who
operate, within the laws given from Genesis, ch. 2 onward, are those over
whom we have dominion. We must be sure to tell them, at every opportunity
and in every situation.

So, I asked Rob, "If we were to go to Idaho, what would you bring along, in
order to handle the idiocy of the titled entities, who think they know who
they are, in the little houses, at the imaginary line, just south of us?"
Rob is the least resistant man I know. He seems to be very accepting of
everything which appears to come his way. Maybe that is because he knows
that nothing "comes his way"; rather, he knows that the situations in which
he finds himself are for the benefit of his own spiritual evolution. He told
me, "I would take only the KJV Holy Bible. It is their law book; it proves
that I have dominion over them. That they (or the alleged titled
"authorities" to whom they defer, e.g.: the Queen) have sworn a false oath
upon it, proves they have agreed to it." I suddenly felt much safer from the
creeps.

What so many of us are doing - what I was doing for 13 years - is trying to
find a loophole within the rules, or find the rule by which we'll win, or
find a rule which will compel the creeps to follow their own rules, or to
force them to do as we say. But the game we are playing is for creeps, only.
I would have to become a creep in order to win a creep's game. Or, even if I
managed to remain honourable and still win a creep's game, my winning it
would make me a creep, wouldn't it? This is the game the rule page of which
might just as well read, in its preface: "You are all powerful, all loving,
all consciousness, all energy, and all light. Are you sure you want to
relinquish all that in order to experience an empty win? How will you feel
after you have defeated another aspect of your own self? Better? Not
bloody likely!"

The entire point of any game is to pretend that: 1. what is true and real
is not true and real; and, 2. what is not true and real is true and real.
In order to play it, properly, and with the adventure and excitement we all
wanted, we had to forget that we are all one consciousness and we had to
believe we are separate from one another. This is what playing the commerce
game is all about. The biggest problem with this game is that we all agreed
to play it . we must have or we wouldn't be here. Maybe, if I change my mind
about the ostensible value of winning this game, the next time I'm offered
the opportunity to come to this dimension-frequency-planet-lifetime, in
order to play it, I'll know better than to get mixed up in something which
can only hurt not only me but also all other aspects of me. What a bore! If
I prove, by my daily living of life, now, that I want only to love and serve
my fellow man by doing what I love to do, my guess is that my next
opportunity will be to spend my life in a place-dimension-time where we all
love and serve one another by doing what we love to do."

So, the Authority Hoax can be exposed with one line from a book which all
agents - those who have relinquished their status as 'man', in order to take
on a title of ostensible authority - are required to follow or they wouldn't
be allowed to remain in the position of agent which they hold. They have,
most likely, not noticed that there is very little truth is this volume of
fiction and they are equally likely to be completely unaware that the one,
tiny part which is true is what will cause them to lose the game, now that
we have found it.

Now, do we know who we are well enough to allow them to catch on to this?
Can we do so lovingly? At some level of their consciousness, they know
that, by continuing to harm others, they are harming themselves. Can we,
maybe, even bring them to the light to see that, if they were to relinquish
their job and title, they would become even more powerful than they believe
themselves to be, in their present (lack of) status. The creeps have been
told, by those whom they believe to have authority over them, that they have
authority over others. Clearly, they did not think this through or they
would have seen the blatant flaw in this idiotic concept.

Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities also has the power
to make you commit atrocities. -Voltaire

I said to Rob, "I do know that no one has any authority over me unless and
until I grant it to them." His comment was staggering, "Not even then. Only
the Creator has any authority. You are God's creation and only that
love-light-energy-consciousness power, aka, God, can "authorize". God is the
supreme authority and author of it all. You do not have the authority you
think you have (unless you live, continuously, in your spirit mind, and
trust only your intuition which tells us the word of God, not to be confused
with the ego mind which tells us the word of LORD God). So, if you think you
have authorized someone else to have authority over you, for example, by
having signed something which both of you have construed as your having
granted authority, either by willingness or by coercion, it has no clout.
You had no authority to give away your authority." YIKES! Again, I felt
safer from the creeps.

This resonates with, "You cannot sign away your rights." Recently, I
realized that the only purpose of a "waiver" is to bring to mind the fact
that we are all responsible for our own experiences. It has nothing to do
with signing away any right to bring suit, if we have been "wronged" (even
though all waivers read this way), because we cannot be "wronged". All our
experiences are our responsibility. Waiver or no waiver, we all have the
right to contract and the right to lay claim, yet, what sort of admission to
a lack of one's personal power does this evidence?! Making someone else
responsible for our experience is as crazy as believing that the Bible is
anything more than a rule book for a vicious game which appears to be
justifiable solely because someone wrote a book on how to play it. The Holy
Bible can be found everywhere - even in prison - because it is the
propaganda of the creeps who want us to continue playing a game we can never
win.

I've noticed that people who identify themselves as "Christian", thereby
ruling out all aspects of their true, limitless, loving nature, believe
there is 'truth' in the Bible. They are accurate, but that truth is only the
truth about the vicious game of commerce, the vicious rules, and the vicious
egos that adore playing it, not the truth about the loving aspects of our
true spirit selves, the loving aspects of the consciousness which created
us, and the consciousness of who we really are. Not counting the first page
and a half, the entire 1508 pages of the Holy Bible, are just crap! If there
ever were anything of value within those pages, whoever edited it out, for
King James, et al, did so, not for our benefit but for the benefit of the
creeps who control us (the Vatican, the Crown, and the Banks). We live in a
world of duality, a mirror image (inverse) fiction of what is real. We live
in a world of utter insanity.

We will NEVER have a solution for "commerce" because our true nature - our
spirit self - does not really want it. A Course In Miracles says that the
job of the ego mind is to, "seek and do not find". It is the desire of the
ego mind to continue to dig in the same hole, year after year, and not truly
want to find an answer. The spirit mind knows that the true answer - love -
is outside the game. The name of that game is Chaos. What our true selves
want is Peace. The creeps are keeping our focus upon the world, upon
commerce, and upon finding a "solution" to both commerce and the problems of
the world (the cause of which IS commerce), so that we will not find freedom
where it truly is . within. Letting go of the continuous search is way too
distasteful for the ego mind to contemplate.

Genesis 1, ch. 26: "Let us make man in our image; after our likeness" sounds
as if WE, as the ONE love-light-energy-consciousness, are co-creators. Did
we include the opposite in order to have a protagonist in our adventure? If
our creation is, indeed, a "duality", we had to create something that is not
we - a "mis-creation" . enter, the creeps. We created the creeps solely to
experience the contrast . to pretend that what is, isn't and what isn't, is.
Since we have become caught up in the game, the best way to survive it is to
remember that it is a game. There is no solution to it, until we all
remember that there is nothing to solve, and there is no end to it, until we
all quit playing.

If we are operating in their realm, they will destroy us because, by our
merely acknowledging their processes, documents, and laws, we prove that we
still believe that they have authority over us. Remember the story of "what
furs?" As long as he kept asking, he did not acknowledge, agree to, or
accept their offer to contract on the matter of "illegal hunting" and the
case was dismissed.

Now that we know we operate in a complete fiction, I feel certain that no
solution TO commerce can be found IN commerce. If we want a solution based
in "truth, we cannot continue to look in the fiction. We have been given the
answer to the puzzle in Genesis, Chapter 1, Verses 26-28.

The only way to prevail against their viciousness is to prove that we know
who we are. The only way to do that is to address them, man to
man-with-title, and let the man-with-title know that we (with no title) have
dominion over all things (e.g.: titles). Our use of their forms, their
language, their laws, trying to "understand" them, etc. proves that we
believe they exist and, as long as we think so, they do.

Both resisting and petitioning which, by giving our energy, attention, and
emotion to something that is unreal, whether in the form of either fear or
anger, only grant these "creeps" even more power over us. By the stunts that
they are pulling, they keep our energy and focus in our first chakra - fear
for our survival. This is how we are controlled. The concept of "there is no
authority outside ourselves" is the hardest thing for us to learn. We cannot
be controlled as long as we remain focused on love.

The creeps' agenda are to keep us in fear - in our first chakra energy -
fear for our survival. When we are at this level of frequency, they can
control us. If we were to ascend into our 4th chakra - love - they would
lose all control over us because this is not a frequency they can access.
If we can operate from love, be love, accept love, then they will cease to
exist in our realm. They cannot operate, be, or accept love, as this is
simply out of their territory. If we are there, they have no control over
us.

Since the creeps feed off our emotions, if they get fear from us, they
become more powerful. As long as they can keep people in fear, they can
remain in control. Those of us who opt to vibrate, oscillate, and function
in love cannot be harmed because we do not fear. What if they can get only
love from us? Since "we are what we eat", what might happen to them? Isn't
this what we want?

"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change
something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." - R.
Buckminster Fuller, 1895-1983, Architect, Author, and Inventor

Love is the Answer, Whatever the Question

There is no law, divine or otherwise; there is only intent. Intent is driven
by fear or love. Love has no agenda or ritual; it just is. It is through our
hearts that we awaken the true power of who we are and this is why so much
energy is put into creating conflict.

It seems as if we are continually saying to the alleged bullies: "If you
cross this line...; alright, if you cross this line.; alright, well, this
is your last chance", and on it goes. If we could either show them love
energy or simply walk away from them, thereby removing all our energy from
them, what would they do, then? Whenever we question how to treat others,
in any particular situation, the correct answer is always to treat them in
the loving way. Are we aware of what we are doing, at all times?

About every situation, Hew Lin asks, "What is it about me which brings me to
this situation? This new situation is only to remind me that I am here to
release connected memories." We all know that memories do not exist
(because they are of the past and the past doesn't exist, except in our
minds which are completely unreliable) and what we believe to be true has
been distorted by our perceptions which include our emotions, programming,
and previous decisions. We must look at every situation as brand new;
otherwise, we are allowing our programmers to run us. So far, they are
prevailing but this is due to our lack of due diligence in applying what we
know, in our hearts, to be true.

"Let us make man in OUR image and after OUR likeness. and let them have
dominion . over all the earth. . And God blessed them and God said unto
them, . have dominion . over every living thing that moveth upon the
earth" - Genesis 1:26 and 28

God is the creator. There is only one God, so who is the "our"? It must be
we as "the ONE". We are it. We are all shards of a shattered pane of glass.
I suppose we could look at one another as separate, but that would be
ludicrous, now that we know we all came from the same pane. So, we made it
very clear, right up-front, that we have dominion over the earth and
everything upon it.

Since these few lines are our remedy, we might ask, "Why didn't they just
omit the only lines which have any truth, aka, our remedy. My friend, Ray,
always said to me, "There must be a remedy or we could charge them with
fraud", to which I have always responded with, "But, since enforcement has
always been the problem for us, how are we going to charge them with fraud,
when they continue to change their song and dance, in order to evade us?"
Also, "Why would they care what we do, when the entire mess is ALL fraud?"

Well, within the fiction, they can do what they want and, since they must
provide the remedy - somewhere, because even they operate within a duality -
they hide it in plain sight . in the very beginning of their law book. The
fact that most people have paid too much attention to the rest of the book
(specifically the parts about the Jesus character) and overlooked the only
lines in existence, wherein the truth is revealed or, in the case of some of
us, completely ignored the entire book-never mind just the first chapter,
or, since all the religions and law societies of the world have deliberately
directed our attention to every word EXCEPT the truth, it stands to reason
that we missed the only part worth knowing.

What we do to another we do to ourselves. The game is about whether we can
remember who we are, before we completely collapse under the belief that we
are separate from one another. If we are playing a game of "can we figure
out that we are all one consciousness, before we destroy each other", we all
win; otherwise, we all lose. Yes, I consider that there are ETs, malicious
beings from elsewhere, heartless beings on this planet, that our bodies and
egos are, quite likely, just a computer program, run by incredibly
brilliant, albeit cruel entities. Still, we, as part of the one
love-light-energy-consciousness-creator-god, opted to include them in our
creation, in order to get back to remembering who we are. It appears as if
we have pulled out the big guns, in order to remind ourselves and, as we are
still resisting the recollection that it is all "we", we are considering
starting the game all over again because we just might not get it this time
around. I suspect we have done this all before.

Stay tuned for Part 2: Love is the Currency of the 21st Century

.


0 new messages