info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Who Wants to Tell the Meteorologists?
49 views
Skip to first unread message
James McGinn
Jan 20, 2017, 5:51:21 PM1/20/17
to
James McGinn:
Question: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find
the evidence?
Answer: A group delusion.
Mikkel Haaheim:
Except that you are the only one who does not accept the evidence. The rest of
us have all recognised that the evidence is there. What do you call a person
who does not see what everyone else can see? Either blînd or ignorant.
James McGinn:
Sorry, U all. Like the little boy in that Han's Christian Andersen tale, the
emperor looks naked to me. Maybe U all should work together to see if U all
can formulate an argument, or even a point. Anything . . .!
little Boy:
A wise persons said once upon a time: "The absence of an evidence is not an
evidence of the absence."
James McGinn:
Right. LOL. So . . . if you don't find a nickel under your pillow that
doesn't mean that the tooth fairy doesn't exist.
Sergio:
"Corporibus ignorantia non excusat"
Pnal:
". . . you haven't provided a single experiment or observation to support your
wacky theory.
James McGinn:
The only evidence we have are the steam tables. All other evidence is
anecdote, conjecture, opinion, speculation and even blatant spiritualism.
Actually, this all indicates a larger, idemic problem. What we have here is a
crisis of logic. Science has been taken over by simpletons whose only goal is
to create simple models to fulfill their childish hunger for certainty.
Pnal:
Steam tables do NOT support your position. You know little about steam tables.
James McGinn:
They contradict your position, you evasive twit.
Pnal:
I'm evasive, asshole? Where did you get your degree? Evasive. Show me any
proof of ANY of your theories? Evasive. Show me any experiment that supports,
for example, that humid air is heavier than dry air? Evasive. You do nothing
but spout fantasy and are 100% evasive when asked to step up and support your
position with facts. In other words, you are evasive.
James McGinn:
Is the boiling point of H2O not 100 C at sea level?
<no response>
Claudius Denkamonte:
Hmm. It would seem that Mr. I'm-not-evasive has, well, evaded!
McGinn is right. There is no dispute about the boiling temperature of water.
There never has been. It is well understood.
Once again, a beautiful theory falls to an ugly fact. Who wants to tell the
meteorologist?
Sergio:
McGinn is an asshole, that is a fact. And you Dink, are retarded, that is
fact too.
Claudius Denk:
Sorry. I understand you are upset. But there is no dispute about the boiling
temperature of water. Facts are facts. McGinn is right. It is well
understood.
Pnal:
Yep, and the boiling point of water has nothing to do with evaporation,
dumbfuck...
Claudius Denk:
LOL. Gee golly. I guess that explains why they used different words to label
them. I learn something new every day.
Hmm. <me scratching my head> I wonder why the call it a boiling point? Hmm.
Pnal:
They call it a boiling point because it's state is as described by the
definition of the phrase "boiling point". You are just too stupid to find the
many observations and experiments on your own...
Claudius Denk:
Kinda like the X files. The evidence is out there, somewhere, go find it . . .
James McGinn:
LOL. Rest assured that meteorologists have been diligently laboring for over a
hundred years now to find this evidence. Any day now, they are going to find
it. It's got to be there! How could 25,000 meteorologists possibly be wrong?
James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
Question: What do you call it when everybody says its true but nobody can find
the evidence?
Answer: A group delusion.
Mikkel Haaheim:
Except that you are the only one who does not accept the evidence. The rest of
us have all recognised that the evidence is there. What do you call a person
who does not see what everyone else can see? Either blînd or ignorant.
James McGinn:
Sorry, U all. Like the little boy in that Han's Christian Andersen tale, the
emperor looks naked to me. Maybe U all should work together to see if U all
can formulate an argument, or even a point. Anything . . .!
little Boy:
A wise persons said once upon a time: "The absence of an evidence is not an
evidence of the absence."
James McGinn:
Right. LOL. So . . . if you don't find a nickel under your pillow that
doesn't mean that the tooth fairy doesn't exist.
Sergio:
"Corporibus ignorantia non excusat"
Pnal:
". . . you haven't provided a single experiment or observation to support your
wacky theory.
James McGinn:
The only evidence we have are the steam tables. All other evidence is
anecdote, conjecture, opinion, speculation and even blatant spiritualism.
Actually, this all indicates a larger, idemic problem. What we have here is a
crisis of logic. Science has been taken over by simpletons whose only goal is
to create simple models to fulfill their childish hunger for certainty.
Pnal:
Steam tables do NOT support your position. You know little about steam tables.
James McGinn:
They contradict your position, you evasive twit.
Pnal:
I'm evasive, asshole? Where did you get your degree? Evasive. Show me any
proof of ANY of your theories? Evasive. Show me any experiment that supports,
for example, that humid air is heavier than dry air? Evasive. You do nothing
but spout fantasy and are 100% evasive when asked to step up and support your
position with facts. In other words, you are evasive.
James McGinn:
Is the boiling point of H2O not 100 C at sea level?
<no response>
Claudius Denkamonte:
Hmm. It would seem that Mr. I'm-not-evasive has, well, evaded!
McGinn is right. There is no dispute about the boiling temperature of water.
There never has been. It is well understood.
Once again, a beautiful theory falls to an ugly fact. Who wants to tell the
meteorologist?
Sergio:
McGinn is an asshole, that is a fact. And you Dink, are retarded, that is
fact too.
Claudius Denk:
Sorry. I understand you are upset. But there is no dispute about the boiling
temperature of water. Facts are facts. McGinn is right. It is well
understood.
Pnal:
Yep, and the boiling point of water has nothing to do with evaporation,
dumbfuck...
Claudius Denk:
LOL. Gee golly. I guess that explains why they used different words to label
them. I learn something new every day.
Hmm. <me scratching my head> I wonder why the call it a boiling point? Hmm.
Pnal:
They call it a boiling point because it's state is as described by the
definition of the phrase "boiling point". You are just too stupid to find the
many observations and experiments on your own...
Claudius Denk:
Kinda like the X files. The evidence is out there, somewhere, go find it . . .
James McGinn:
LOL. Rest assured that meteorologists have been diligently laboring for over a
hundred years now to find this evidence. Any day now, they are going to find
it. It's got to be there! How could 25,000 meteorologists possibly be wrong?
James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
reber g=emc^2
Jan 23, 2017, 2:56:04 PM1/23/17
to
James McGinn
Feb 12, 2017, 12:12:39 PM2/12/17
to
On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 2:51:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
James McGinn
Mar 21, 2017, 9:57:57 AM3/21/17
to
On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 2:51:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
Double-A
Mar 21, 2017, 5:54:33 PM3/21/17
to
Double-A
James McGinn
Apr 8, 2017, 3:41:21 PM4/8/17
to
On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 2:51:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
James McGinn
May 9, 2017, 10:44:30 PM5/9/17
to
On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 2:51:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
James McGinn
Sep 2, 2017, 11:20:16 AM9/2/17
to
James McGinn
Sep 2, 2017, 11:21:15 AM9/2/17
to
On Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 7:44:30 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
James McGinn
Oct 18, 2017, 10:37:38 PM10/18/17
to
James McGinn
Jan 6, 2018, 2:59:02 PM1/6/18
to
On Friday, January 20, 2017 at 2:51:21 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
0 new messages