info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Where is all this evidence?
99 views
Skip to first unread message
James McGinn
Jan 19, 2017, 12:36:52 AM1/19/17
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
On Tuesday, December 20, 2016 at 10:27:20 AM UTC-8, edpr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 20, 2016 at 9:21:13 AM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote:
> > Uh, er . . . how is it that Feynman was not talking about
> > pretenders like yourself?
>
> Let's see:
> > > >> "It does not matter who you are,
> > > >> or how smart you are,
> > > >> or what title you have,
> > > >> or how many of you there are,
>
> So we can ignore your failed Meteorology schooling
> and my successful Physics degree. Also how many others
> have condemned your posts or my posts.
It's regrettable you can't address my thinking directly.
>
> > > >> and certainly not how many papers your
> > > >> side has published,
>
> Or how much "web content" you are so proud to brag about!
>
> > > >> if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong.
>
> So many posts showing your predictions fail to match reality.
> It doesn't matter how much you want to ignore those rebuttals.
Uh . . . er?
>
> In contrast, I and others point to successful weather predictions,
> physical property measurements of water, chemistry experiments,
> Physics experiments that all match the standard theory.
>
> > > >> Period."
> >
> > Duhr.
>
> You can wail and cry all you want. Deny the evidence exists too.
Uh . . .
>
> yes I am feeding the troll, but reminding new readers in this group
> that JM doesn't have a clue how to do physics.
>
> (Watch his next post will say: where is all this evidence?
> and you gentle readers can easily find it in the Google.
> But poor JM cannot see what contradicts his theory.)
Where is all this evidence?
> On Tuesday, December 20, 2016 at 9:21:13 AM UTC-5, James McGinn wrote:
> > Uh, er . . . how is it that Feynman was not talking about
> > pretenders like yourself?
>
> Let's see:
> > > >> "It does not matter who you are,
> > > >> or how smart you are,
> > > >> or what title you have,
> > > >> or how many of you there are,
>
> So we can ignore your failed Meteorology schooling
> and my successful Physics degree. Also how many others
> have condemned your posts or my posts.
It's regrettable you can't address my thinking directly.
>
> > > >> and certainly not how many papers your
> > > >> side has published,
>
> Or how much "web content" you are so proud to brag about!
>
> > > >> if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong.
>
> So many posts showing your predictions fail to match reality.
> It doesn't matter how much you want to ignore those rebuttals.
Uh . . . er?
>
> In contrast, I and others point to successful weather predictions,
> physical property measurements of water, chemistry experiments,
> Physics experiments that all match the standard theory.
>
> > > >> Period."
> >
> > Duhr.
>
> You can wail and cry all you want. Deny the evidence exists too.
Uh . . .
>
> yes I am feeding the troll, but reminding new readers in this group
> that JM doesn't have a clue how to do physics.
>
> (Watch his next post will say: where is all this evidence?
> and you gentle readers can easily find it in the Google.
> But poor JM cannot see what contradicts his theory.)
Where is all this evidence?
Claudius Denk
Jan 20, 2017, 12:10:27 PM1/20/17
to
On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 9:36:52 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> > > Uh, er . . . how is it that Feynman was not talking about
> > > pretenders like yourself?
> > > Uh, er . . . how is it that Feynman was not talking about
> > > pretenders like yourself?
> > So we can ignore your failed Meteorology schooling
> > and my successful Physics degree. Also how many others
> > have condemned your posts or my posts.
LOL. The nitwit blatantly contradicts the spirit of Feynman's comment--right off the bat. Surreal.
> > and my successful Physics degree. Also how many others
> > have condemned your posts or my posts.
> > So many posts showing your predictions fail to match reality.
> > It doesn't matter how much you want to ignore those rebuttals.
>
> Uh . . . er?
> > In contrast, I and others point to successful weather predictions,
> > physical property measurements of water, chemistry experiments,
> > Physics experiments that all match the standard theory.
> > yes I am feeding the troll, but reminding new readers in this group
> > that JM doesn't have a clue how to do physics.
> > (Watch his next post will say: where is all this evidence?
> > and you gentle readers can easily find it in the Google.
> > But poor JM cannot see what contradicts his theory.)
>
> Where is all this evidence?
CD
James McGinn
Jan 30, 2017, 2:01:55 AM1/30/17
to
James McGinn
Feb 11, 2017, 11:27:07 AM2/11/17
to
James McGinn
Feb 11, 2017, 6:08:57 PM2/11/17
to
James McGinn
Feb 20, 2017, 7:05:57 PM2/20/17
to
James McGinn
Mar 28, 2017, 6:39:43 PM3/28/17
to
James McGinn
Apr 1, 2017, 5:24:13 PM4/1/17
to
James McGinn
May 31, 2017, 3:42:25 AM5/31/17
to
James McGinn
Aug 6, 2017, 1:48:05 PM8/6/17
to
James McGinn
Sep 11, 2017, 10:57:50 AM9/11/17
to
James McGinn
Sep 12, 2017, 9:56:15 AM9/12/17
to
James McGinn
Sep 20, 2017, 4:10:33 PM9/20/17
to
James McGinn
Oct 2, 2017, 11:16:52 AM10/2/17
to
James McGinn
Oct 9, 2017, 1:42:21 AM10/9/17
to
James McGinn
Oct 9, 2017, 1:53:39 AM10/9/17
to
On Wednesday, January 18, 2017 at 9:36:52 PM UTC-8, James McGinn wrote:
> Where is all this evidence?
Seriously, where is it?
Is it a secret?
Jame McGinn / Solving Tornades
The 'Missing Link' of Meteorology's Theory of Storms
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=16329
James McGinn
Oct 14, 2017, 9:59:55 AM10/14/17
to
James McGinn
Oct 16, 2017, 1:46:55 PM10/16/17
to
Tjghfh
James McGinn
Oct 17, 2017, 4:00:35 PM10/17/17
to
James McGinn
Feb 24, 2018, 8:01:13 PM2/24/18
to
James McGinn
Mar 3, 2018, 3:10:27 PM3/3/18
to
James McGinn
Mar 5, 2018, 2:26:43 PM3/5/18
to
James McGinn
Jun 19, 2018, 5:14:05 PM6/19/18
to
James McGinn
Jun 26, 2018, 3:49:33 PM6/26/18
to
James McGinn
Jun 30, 2018, 11:50:36 AM6/30/18
to
0 new messages