PROOF OF GOD? Attacking Chung is God's will as He knows Chung is a fraud
Condemned and Stricken Flying Rat
Well let's apply the methodology of Chung shall we?
I became a diabetic apparently some 20 years ago. That led me to the
health and diabetes newsgroups.
There I came across Chung spamming and abusing the groups with his fake
Christianity, money scams and deadly diets. So if me being diabetic is
God's will, then it's God's will that brought me there to attack Chung
as I apparently don't have any "free will".
Bottomline: If there is a God, He wants me to shine light on the fakery
and abuses of Chung. Because God made me a diabetic. So when Chung
screams and howls about me being diabetic, what he is actually saying is
that his precious God has arranged for me to attack him!
Aren't you glad Chung has never been in the military? He would be
shooting himself in the ass constantly.
FR
GODEATER
"Condemned and Stricken Flying Rat" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.207c5fb98...@news.readfreenews.net...
my turn to play with him.
Condemned and Stricken Flying Rat
shown up yet again
In article <MPG.207c5fb98...@news.readfreenews.net>,
m...@privacy.net says...
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>
> Attacking Chung is God's will?
HE permits it as part of HIS proof of HIS spiritual law of 2
Thessalonians 2:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Proof
> Well let's apply the methodology of Chung shall we?
The scientific method belongs to GOD, Who is the Source of all
knowledge and wisdom.
> I became a diabetic apparently some 20 years ago.
If your diabetes is type-2, it has arisen from the sin of gluttony.
> That led me to the
> health and diabetes newsgroups.
You would have been wiser to seek the counsel of doctor(s) instead.
> There I came across Chung spamming and abusing the groups with his fake
> Christianity, money scams and deadly diets.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/FR
Your false witness is forgiven by me.
May GOD not hold this additional sin against you because you know not
what you are doing.
> So if me being diabetic is God's will,
Actually, your being diabetic is possibly due to your own sin.
> then it's God's will that brought me there to attack Chung
> as I apparently don't have any "free will".
Your disease has possibly arisen from your free will choice to sin.
> Bottomline: If there is a God, He wants me to shine light on the fakery
> and abuses of Chung.
Without the LORD, your fantasies are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
> Because God made me a diabetic.
It is possible that your own sin has caused your diabetes.
> So when Chung
> screams and howls about me being diabetic, what he is actually saying is
> that his precious God has arranged for me to attack him!
See above.
> Aren't you glad Chung has never been in the military? He would be
> shooting himself in the ass constantly.
Without the LORD, your imagination is meaningless (Ecclesiastes)
May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way.
Prayerfully in Jesus' ever-lasting love,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com
May HIS immortal brethren pray for our dying mortal friends and
neighbors:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
In memory of our dearly departed Bob(this one) Pastorio:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob
Lew Bates
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1175651039.2...@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Having been in the military, I can say with absolute certainty that the good
doctor Ching (or is it Chang) wouldn't have made it through one day of boot
camp and God forbid he would have been an officer (as doctors are given the
rank of Captain straight away.) Cheng has a hard time keeping an eye on his
birds so it's not difficult to imagine he would have a hard time being a
company-grade officer.
As for your insulting comments towards this man with a disease, shame on you
Ching, "Judge Not, Lest Ye Be Judged".
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Without the LORD, your beliefs are meaingless (Ecclesiastes).
> Cheng has a hard time keeping an eye on his
> birds so it's not difficult to imagine he would have a hard time being a
> company-grade officer.
Without the LORD, your imagination is meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
> As for your insulting comments towards this man with a disease, shame on you
> Ching, "Judge Not, Lest Ye Be Judged".
Without the LORD, your opinion is meaningless.
Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit.
May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way.
Prayerfully in Jesus' ever-lasting love,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com
May HIS immortal brethren pray for our dying mortal friends and
neighbors:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
In memory of our dearly departed Bob(this one) Pastorio:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob
>
>
Pastor Kutchie, Earthquack's nemesis
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in messagenews:1175651039.2...@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Chung is a self-experiment in anti-cybernetics, an attempt to build an
inverted Turing machine - a human being that nobody can tell isn't a
computer.
He isn't doing very well.
Art Deco
another email address spewed:
>Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit.
The Bartlo is strong with this one.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert
Lew Bates
And without sanity, your life is meaningless. Again, I see Dr. Andrew Chung
as being accusatory, judgemental and defensive, none of these are behaviors
that encapsulate a true Christian. You have been dishonest in this group
about your situation and that also is NOT Christian behavior. As for my
beliefs, you know absolutely nothing about me, again, judgement is not
something you should step into without the tools to back it up. You
however, spill your guts every single day in this group and are foolish
enough to put your life story (or at least the part that sounds good) on the
internet, so it's relatively easy to form an opinion.
You call people "demons," again, is that Christian behavior? I see two
sides to Andrew Chung, no doubt he thinks of himself as a Christian but
there are many statements he's made that would point away from that. That's
my two pounds for the day.
Lew Bates
"Pastor Kutchie, Earthquack's nemesis" <use...@heathens.org.uk> wrote in
message news:1175675623.0...@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
You'd think, as long as he's been here, that he'd have one or two friends
but he doesn't. The ones that do come along occasionally are likely sock
puppets. He may pay someone occasionally to come in here and support his
"two pounds of bs" diet or to back up one of his posts but sock accounts are
so easy to create, I imagine Ching has had at least 4 or 5 dozen over the
years.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
Mu
> Again, I see Dr. Andrew Chung
> as being accusatory, judgemental and defensive, none of these are behaviors
> that encapsulate a true Christian.
aSSuming you to be correct, why not? Whip out your pre-definition of a
true Christian, enlighten us all.
True Christians, they have no faults? Or only the faults you select?
Where this list of acceptable/unacceptable faults, I missed that in
Christ's teachings.
If anything is true, looking at the diversity of failures among His
Apostles, there is no true Christian so refile that definition back in
your head, push the "Erase Brain" button, and get a grip.
Mu
> You'd think, as long as he's been here, that he'd have one or two friends
> but he doesn't. The ones that do come along occasionally are likely sock
> puppets. He may pay someone occasionally to come in here and support his
> "two pounds of bs" diet or to back up one of his posts but sock accounts are
> so easy to create, I imagine Ching has had at least 4 or 5 dozen over the
> years.
How's it feel to be wrong twice in less than ten minutes? Oh, of course,
Chung can't have any Usenet friends, they /have/ to be sock puppets.
How did you know I am on Chung's stipend? I get ten asspennies for every
pro-Chuung post. What do you get?
You get Mu-ed who makes you look like a pimply teenager with too much
time on your hands.
Yes, creation, at least you got that one right, it was easy, Dad was a
great lover.
Lew Bates
"Mu" <nocowi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1pvlbrxzqxaxo$.1vbd46bxqffg2$.dlg@40tude.net...
Son, I think the best part of you may have left a stain on your moms sheets,
if that's the case, I sure hope she washed them. Thorozine, it's not just
for breakfast anymore so please, take your afternoon dose and shut the F up.
kora...@gmail.com
> How's it feel to be wrong twice in less than ten minutes?
You of all poeple should know...
Lew Bates
Of course, any dunderheaded idiot could see the second tongue with which our
good Chung speakith, but you're not just any idiot, you're an insufferable
lout with the mind of a six month old Baboon, not a good combination. I
hope you can at least use hand signals to let someone know it's feeding
time. Well, I'm sure Chung makes sure you get your two pounds per day.
Mu
> "Mu" <nocowi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ntf7l34wujib$.1ob58xr95qsr3.dlg@40tude.net...
>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 14:25:38 -0400, Lew Bates wrote:
>>
>>> Again, I see Dr. Andrew Chung
>>> as being accusatory, judgemental and defensive, none of these are
>>> behaviors
>>> that encapsulate a true Christian.
>>
>> aSSuming you to be correct, why not? Whip out your pre-definition of a
>> true Christian, enlighten us all.
>>
>> True Christians, they have no faults? Or only the faults you select?
>> Where this list of acceptable/unacceptable faults, I missed that in
>> Christ's teachings.
>>
>> If anything is true, looking at the diversity of failures among His
>> Apostles, there is no true Christian so refile that definition back in
>> your head, push the "Erase Brain" button, and get a grip.
>>
>
> Of course, any dunderheaded idiot could see the second tongue with which our
> good Chung speakith, but you're not just any idiot, you're an insufferable
> lout with the mind of a six month old Baboon, not a good combination. I
> hope you can at least use hand signals to let someone know it's feeding
> time. Well, I'm sure Chung makes sure you get your two pounds per day.
To summarize, you haven't a thing to say about my comment, nor one
question did you answer, instead you childishly punted to an ad hominem
attack.
Here's a clue, take on Mu
Better know what to do.
Mu
Why is that? Cites, no childish dribble, I got Master Bates for that.
Lew Bates
What's 'Mu' short for, manure? Oh and sometimes when you're dealing with
people that live in the sewer, you have to go into the gutter. In your
case, I actually had to crawl into the sewer to sink to your level. The
permeating stench was so overpowering that I couldn't stay long, otherwise I
would spend more time jousting, alas, it's no fun when you're dealing with a
rat. As for my so-called "ad hominem" response, I only answer questions of
substance. However, I will make a small exception this time since you've
probably been waiting all night for a response (even a stinking rat deserves
a crust of bread on occasion.)
To answer your lame questions, Ching (or is it Chang) is a hypocrite,
accusing a sick man of causing his own somatic illness in a dogmatic style
and then rubbing it in.
Lew Bates
Please, keep your sexual habits to yourself, this is a cardiology group, not
a sexual discussion forum or pulpit. Doubtless Chung would be proud of your
Christian behavior, although the man certainly does have friends in low
places.
Mu
> To answer your lame questions, Ching (or is it Chang) is a hypocrite,
> accusing a sick man of causing his own somatic illness in a dogmatic style
> and then rubbing it in.
To summarize, you haven't a thing to say about my comment, nor one
question did you answer, instead you childishly punted to an ad hominem
attack.
FYI before I PLONK you, for the archives Master Bates, I asked three
times:
"aSSuming you to be correct, why not? Whip out your pre-definition of a
true Christian, enlighten us all.
True Christians, they have no faults? Or only the faults you select?
Where this list of acceptable/unacceptable faults, I missed that in
Christ's teachings."
If anything is true, looking at the diversity of failures among His
Apostles, there is no true Christian so refile that definition back in
your head, push the "Erase Brain" button, and get a grip.
Here's a clue, take on Mu
Better know what to do.
When Mu meets child
Off you go for awhile.
*PLONK*
Lew Bates
I win.
Art Deco
Lovely kookfroth today, Chung-slurper.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen
"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen