info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Riedt’s constant Y = 5022635
16 views
Skip to first unread message
Peter Riedt
Jan 15, 2018, 5:23:04 PM1/15/18
to
Riedt’s constant Y = 5022635
The value of Y connects the nine major planets by their semi major axis
divided by their orbital velocity and divided by their orbital period in earth years.
rm vm opy Y=rm/vm/opy
MER 57,909,231,029 47872.33119 0.2408416 5022635
VEN 108,209,525,401 35020.93000 0.6151856 5022635
EAR 149,598,319,494 29784.86500 0.9999988 5022635
MAR 227,943,771,564 24130.71224 1.8807278 5022635
JUP 778,342,761,465 13056.07169 11.8693454 5022635
SAT 1,426,714,892,866 9643.82000 29.4548244 5022635
URA 2,870,633,540,862 6798.95700 84.0627938 5022635
NEP 4,498,393,012,162 5432.26100 164.8713207 5022635
PLU 5,906,438,090,764 4737.55900 248.2214844 5022635
The value of Y connects the nine major planets by their semi major axis
divided by their orbital velocity and divided by their orbital period in earth years.
rm vm opy Y=rm/vm/opy
MER 57,909,231,029 47872.33119 0.2408416 5022635
VEN 108,209,525,401 35020.93000 0.6151856 5022635
EAR 149,598,319,494 29784.86500 0.9999988 5022635
MAR 227,943,771,564 24130.71224 1.8807278 5022635
JUP 778,342,761,465 13056.07169 11.8693454 5022635
SAT 1,426,714,892,866 9643.82000 29.4548244 5022635
URA 2,870,633,540,862 6798.95700 84.0627938 5022635
NEP 4,498,393,012,162 5432.26100 164.8713207 5022635
PLU 5,906,438,090,764 4737.55900 248.2214844 5022635
Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž
Jan 16, 2018, 2:47:14 AM1/16/18
to
Dne 15/01/2018 v 23:23 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
What remains is to express the relation
of Y to G.Ms
where G is Gravitation constant
and Ms is the Sun mass.
BTW, if you consider 5,906,438,090,764 as unstable parameter,
why so many valid digits ? It is not scientific approach.
I would rather say a parameter with faked accuracy.
--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.
of Y to G.Ms
where G is Gravitation constant
and Ms is the Sun mass.
BTW, if you consider 5,906,438,090,764 as unstable parameter,
why so many valid digits ? It is not scientific approach.
I would rather say a parameter with faked accuracy.
--
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
A wise man guards words he says,
as they say about him more,
than he says about the subject.
Peter Riedt
Jan 16, 2018, 6:34:12 AM1/16/18
to
On Tuesday, January 16, 2018 at 3:47:14 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž wrote:
> Dne 15/01/2018 v 23:23 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
> > Riedt’s constant Y = 5022635
> >
> > The value of Y connects the nine major planets by their semi major axis
> > divided by their orbital velocity and divided by their orbital period in earth years.
> >
> > rm vm opy Y=rm/vm/opy
> > MER 57,909,231,029 47872.33119 0.2408416 5022635
> > VEN 108,209,525,401 35020.93000 0.6151856 5022635
> > EAR 149,598,319,494 29784.86500 0.9999988 5022635
> > MAR 227,943,771,564 24130.71224 1.8807278 5022635
> > JUP 778,342,761,465 13056.07169 11.8693454 5022635
> > SAT 1,426,714,892,866 9643.82000 29.4548244 5022635
> > URA 2,870,633,540,862 6798.95700 84.0627938 5022635
> > NEP 4,498,393,012,162 5432.26100 164.8713207 5022635
> > PLU 5,906,438,090,764 4737.55900 248.2214844 5022635
> >
>
> What remains is to express the relation
> of Y to G.Ms
> where G is Gravitation constant
> and Ms is the Sun mass.
>
Yes.
> Dne 15/01/2018 v 23:23 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
> > Riedt’s constant Y = 5022635
> >
> > The value of Y connects the nine major planets by their semi major axis
> > divided by their orbital velocity and divided by their orbital period in earth years.
> >
> > rm vm opy Y=rm/vm/opy
> > MER 57,909,231,029 47872.33119 0.2408416 5022635
> > VEN 108,209,525,401 35020.93000 0.6151856 5022635
> > EAR 149,598,319,494 29784.86500 0.9999988 5022635
> > MAR 227,943,771,564 24130.71224 1.8807278 5022635
> > JUP 778,342,761,465 13056.07169 11.8693454 5022635
> > SAT 1,426,714,892,866 9643.82000 29.4548244 5022635
> > URA 2,870,633,540,862 6798.95700 84.0627938 5022635
> > NEP 4,498,393,012,162 5432.26100 164.8713207 5022635
> > PLU 5,906,438,090,764 4737.55900 248.2214844 5022635
> >
>
> What remains is to express the relation
> of Y to G.Ms
> where G is Gravitation constant
> and Ms is the Sun mass.
>
Martin Brown
Jan 16, 2018, 9:10:34 AM1/16/18
to
At least Kepler's third law T^2 = k.a^3 has useful predictive power.
--
Regards,
Martin Brown
Paul B. Andersen
Jan 16, 2018, 4:11:46 PM1/16/18
to
v = 2π⋅r/Ts
where:
v is the orbital speed in metres per second
r is the radius of the circle in metres
Ts is the period in seconds
Riedt’s constant Y = r/v/Ty
where Ty is the period in year
Y = r/(2π⋅r/Ts)/Ty = Ty/(2π⋅Ts)
Ty/Ts = 31556952
Y = 5022445
What's the point with your constant?
--
Paul
https://paulba.no/
Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž
Jan 16, 2018, 4:57:51 PM1/16/18
to
Dne 16/01/2018 v 12:34 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
So .....
BTW, semi major axis of planets
definitely is not known with precision of 1 metre.
It is manifestation of ignorance.
Especially the one of Pluto.
Also, it fluctuates because of influence of big planets.
BTW, semi major axis of planets
definitely is not known with precision of 1 metre.
It is manifestation of ignorance.
Especially the one of Pluto.
Also, it fluctuates because of influence of big planets.
Anders Eklöf
Jan 16, 2018, 5:10:11 PM1/16/18
to
fun. But I checked the headers, and it's really him.
Different IP, but the same network, and IPs are dynamic, so...
--
I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour
Peter Riedt
Jan 16, 2018, 6:55:46 PM1/16/18
to
Martin Brown
Jan 17, 2018, 2:39:24 AM1/17/18
to
that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else.
--
Regards,
Martin Brown
Peter Riedt
Jan 18, 2018, 10:57:04 PM1/18/18
to
Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž
Jan 19, 2018, 1:56:15 AM1/19/18
to
Dne 19/01/2018 v 04:57 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
respective on your inaccurate formula replacing r by a ?
>
>>> What's the point with restating my formula?
>>
>> He is pointing out that it is a boring numerical identity with a value
>> that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else.
>>
>
>>> What's the point with restating my formula?
>>
>> He is pointing out that it is a boring numerical identity with a value
>> that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else.
>>
>
> What else could there be to make it more exciting?
>
What is exciting on the exact formula v = 2 . pi . r / T,
>
respective on your inaccurate formula replacing r by a ?
Peter Riedt
Jan 19, 2018, 3:52:24 AM1/19/18
to
Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž
Jan 19, 2018, 4:25:11 PM1/19/18
to
Dne 19/01/2018 v 09:52 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
The given value of rm determined the value of T.
The given values of rm and T
do not determine speed, as the mean speed,
apogee speed and perigee speed depend on the eccentricity.
> On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 2:56:15 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž wrote:
>> Dne 19/01/2018 v 04:57 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
>>>
>>>>> What's the point with restating my formula?
>>>>
>>>> He is pointing out that it is a boring numerical identity with a value
>>>> that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What else could there be to make it more exciting?
>>>
>> What is exciting on the exact formula v = 2 . pi . r / T,
>> respective on your inaccurate formula replacing r by a ?
>>
>> Dne 19/01/2018 v 04:57 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
>>>
>>>>> What's the point with restating my formula?
>>>>
>>>> He is pointing out that it is a boring numerical identity with a value
>>>> that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What else could there be to make it more exciting?
>>>
>> What is exciting on the exact formula v = 2 . pi . r / T,
>> respective on your inaccurate formula replacing r by a ?
>>
> I am using the semi major axis and called it rm.
It does not make the equation right.
The given value of rm determined the value of T.
The given values of rm and T
do not determine speed, as the mean speed,
apogee speed and perigee speed depend on the eccentricity.
Peter Riedt
Jan 20, 2018, 2:43:50 AM1/20/18
to
Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž
Jan 20, 2018, 5:36:42 AM1/20/18
to
Dne 20/01/2018 v 08:43 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
Validity of your formulas and calculations
is usually irrelevant to you, Peter.
You give higher priority to your fixed ideas.
> On Saturday, January 20, 2018 at 5:25:11 AM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž wrote:
>> Dne 19/01/2018 v 09:52 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
>>> On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 2:56:15 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž wrote:
>>>> Dne 19/01/2018 v 04:57 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's the point with restating my formula?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He is pointing out that it is a boring numerical identity with a value
>>>>>> that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What else could there be to make it more exciting?
>>>>>
>>>> What is exciting on the exact formula v = 2 . pi . r / T,
>>>> respective on your inaccurate formula replacing r by a ?
>>>>
>>
>>> I am using the semi major axis and called it rm.
>>
>> It does not make the equation right.
>>
>> The given value of rm determined the value of T.
>>
>> The given values of rm and T
>> do not determine speed, as the mean speed,
>> apogee speed and perigee speed depend on the eccentricity.
>>
>
> Yes but irrelevant.
>> Dne 19/01/2018 v 09:52 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
>>> On Friday, January 19, 2018 at 2:56:15 PM UTC+8, Libor 'Poutnik' Stříž wrote:
>>>> Dne 19/01/2018 v 04:57 Peter Riedt napsal(a):
>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's the point with restating my formula?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He is pointing out that it is a boring numerical identity with a value
>>>>>> that depends only on the measurement units used and nothing else.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What else could there be to make it more exciting?
>>>>>
>>>> What is exciting on the exact formula v = 2 . pi . r / T,
>>>> respective on your inaccurate formula replacing r by a ?
>>>>
>>
>>> I am using the semi major axis and called it rm.
>>
>> It does not make the equation right.
>>
>> The given value of rm determined the value of T.
>>
>> The given values of rm and T
>> do not determine speed, as the mean speed,
>> apogee speed and perigee speed depend on the eccentricity.
>>
>
Validity of your formulas and calculations
is usually irrelevant to you, Peter.
You give higher priority to your fixed ideas.
0 new messages