Thanks for info. It is combination of the same exception unhandled in
more packages. New Sorl tries intelligently rotate images according
exif info stored by difital camera. PIL is the origin of bug and they
fixed it in PIL 1.1.7 by adding the same try/except/pass block as I
did for development version of sorl-thumbnail and sent with bugreport.
Sorl accept three engines, not only PIL. There are many solutions and
some are overkill if anything must be required from user.
--Hynek
On 12 dub, 18:01, Darren Hollenbeck <
dar...@softplc.com> wrote:
> I'm not too familiar with the jpeg stuff (no idea what EXIF is), but I was
> able to get Sorl thumbnail v11 working with that image by installing the
> libjpeg-devel package onto my system. Without the dev package it gave me
> the same key error.
>
> Don't know if that info helps.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 4:06:36 PM UTC-5, Chris Moffitt wrote:
>
> > Ahh. I'm glad you figured that out. I noticed some odd behavior there and
> > couldn't figure it out. It might be worthwhile to add a dummy exif info to
> > our file just for now until the patch is implemented.
>
> > -Chris
>
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:46 PM, hynekcer wrote:
>
> >> I found that Sorl thumbnal v. 11 fails on our default image
> >> "satchmo/static/images/productimage-picture-default.jpg"
> >> I reported it to themhttps://
github.com/sorl/sorl-thumbnail/issues/98
> >> > >>
satchmo-user...@googlegroups.com.
> >>
satchmo-user...@googlegroups.com.