Have you considered utopian.io as a way to fund contributions to the sandstorm app economy?

51 views
Skip to first unread message

miste...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 29, 2019, 7:13:02 PM1/29/19
to Sandstorm Development
I recently posted some of this in the IRC server, but I thought i'd put it here as well.


This is a service built on the steem blockchain ( i have major reservations with steem, but Utopian hopes to be blockchain agnostic eventually)

Check out the website it will explain better than i do, but as a project owner you can submit tasks and users can take a task, once they finish it utopian will pay for the work that they did (to some amount, it's an incentive, not necessarily to contribute, not really a market rate).

I think that your project would really speak to the crowd on steem, many people there are privacy focused and believe in open source tech, so i believe it's a good place to spread the word (in fact I intend to feature sandstorm on my blog on steem for what ever it's worth) 

Jacob Weisz

unread,
Jan 29, 2019, 7:39:54 PM1/29/19
to sandst...@googlegroups.com
Why does it need to be on the blockchain? BountySource works great for... more or less the same thing.

However, the main issue with Sandstorm development at the moment isn't availability of funding, it's availability of Kenton. There's only a handful of people who are familiar with the internals of Sandstorm enough to contribute to the platform itself.

--
  Jacob Weisz

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Sandstorm Development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sandstorm-de...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

miste...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 6:30:40 PM1/30/19
to Sandstorm Development
Well on their last blog post kenton talked about how they had to stop their free-version just to become net-neutral...  So it sure seems like there is a funding issue.

Maybe this makes more sense for APP development rather than sandstorm itself. 
As far as Utopian vs BountySource... the main difference is that project owners don't necessarily need to fund bounties (although that seems to be an option), open source contributions are rewarded by the network itself.  The way blockchain comes in that the steem network works like a giant DAO, since UTOPIAN owns and is delegated a large stake in the network, they use this to vote for funds released from the 'rewards pool'.  Basically stake gives the ability to grant funds created through inflation on the supply on the steem token.  So utopian uses this function of the network to contributors to open source projects. 

Like i said, i have reservations about steem, but they have a built in community and people looking for cool projects to contribute on so they can get more funds.  

There are quite a few broken apps on the appmarket, this is a way that someone might come along and fix them, and get paid, with out any cost to SANDSTORM. 

Sorry maybe i meant more for 

miste...@gmail.com

unread,
Jan 30, 2019, 6:49:56 PM1/30/19
to Sandstorm Development
Also, there is no reason it is a utopian vs bountysource situation at all... should use both, they both have their own communities. 

Nils Hoover

unread,
May 25, 2019, 1:40:59 PM5/25/19
to Sandstorm Development

Nils Hoover

unread,
May 25, 2019, 1:43:00 PM5/25/19
to Sandstorm Development
Ugh, sorry meant to write more. People are excited about sandstorm, they are just turned off because of lack of app development. What would it take to incentivise new development on sandstorm?

Kevin Reid

unread,
May 25, 2019, 2:00:03 PM5/25/19
to Sandstorm Development
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 10:43 AM Nils Hoover <miste...@gmail.com> wrote:
Ugh, sorry meant to write more.  People are excited about sandstorm, they are just turned off because of lack of app development.   What would it take to incentivise new development on sandstorm?

Here's a random suggestion: I recently tried to start packaging an app and ran into https://github.com/sandstorm-io/vagrant-spk/issues/213 ("vagrant-spk enter-grain: Value too large for defined data type"). Without being able to look into the grain environment easily I couldn't debug what the app was expecting versus getting.

Fixing bugs like this to make the development/porting process easy and trouble-free will help developers not just give up. And the knowledge to fix this is probably useful for other Sandstorm platform improvements.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages