What is NiShthA pratyaya?

[KN.Ramesh]

What is  NiShthA pratyaya?

Can some one help with examples?

thanks

namaskarams

[Hnbhat B.R.]

क्त-क्तवतू निष्ठा!

गतः, गतवान्!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "samskrita" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to samskrita+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sams...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/samskrita.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[अभ्यंकरकुलोत्पन्नः श्रीपादः | श्रीपतेः पदयुगं स्मरणीयम् ।]

"क्त-क्तवतू" इत्यत्र तु द्विवचनमस्ति | अथ किं निष्ठा-शब्दस्य एकवचनमेव ?

प्रायः अस्मिन् सूत्रे एकः प्रश्नः "निष्ठा इति किम् ?" तस्य उत्तरं "क्त-क्तवतू" ! तेन क्त-क्तवत्वोः यो भावः तदेव निष्ठा ! 

क्त-क्तवत्वोः यो भावः सः कथं निष्ठेति मन्तव्यः तत्तु न जानामि ! 

अनुगृहीतो भवामि सोदाहरणं दिग्दर्शनं भवति चेत् ! 

[Hnbhat B.R.]

क्त-क्तवतू प्रत्ययौ संज्ञिनौ, निष्ठा संज्ञा! संज्ञासूत्रमिदम! निष्ठा इत्युक्ते क्तप्रत्ययः, क्तवतुप्रत्ययश्च संज्ञितौ भवत इति भावः!

न तु क्तक्तवत्वोर्भावः निष्ठा इत्यर्थः! भूते ३।२।७४ 

निष्ठा ३।२।१०२ भवति

इत्यक्ते भूते काले क्त-क्तवतू प्रत्ययौ भवतः इत्यर्थः!

--

[Hnbhat B.R.]

On Friday, August 25, 2017, अभ्यंकरकुलोत्पन्नः श्रीपादः | श्रीपतेः पदयुगं स्मरणीयम् । <sl.abh...@gmail.com> wrote:

"क्त-क्तवतू" इत्यत्र तु द्विवचनमस्ति | अथ किं निष्ठा-शब्दस्य एकवचनमेव ?

तौ सत् इत्यत्रैव क्त-क्तवतू निष्ठासंज्ञौ भवतः इत्येवार्थः!

 

प्रायः अस्मिन् सूत्रे एकः प्रश्नः "निष्ठा इति किम् ?" तस्य उत्तरं "क्त-क्तवतू" ! तेन क्त-क्तवत्वोः यो भावः तदेव निष्ठा ! 

क्त-क्तवत्वोः यो भावः सः कथं निष्ठेति मन्तव्यः! तत्तु न जानामि !

कथमयमर्थो लब्ध इत्यहमपि न जानामि!

 

अनुगृहीतो भवामि सोदाहरणं दिग्दर्शनं भवति चेत् ! 

--

[vasantha syamalam]

अहं चिन्तयामि- यथा बालकद्वयं, पुत्रद्वयं- इति प्रयोगे अस्ति तथा एव निष्ठा इति शब्दः अपि एक वचने प्रचलति| ऊहित्वा एव वदामि| परन्तु निष्ठा एतस्य अर्थं न जानामि|

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Hnbhat B.R. <hnbh...@gmail.com> wrote:

This message is eligible for Automatic Cleanup! (hnbh...@gmail.com) Add cleanup rule | More info

On Friday, August 25, 2017, अभ्यंकरकुलोत्पन्नः श्रीपादः | श्रीपतेः पदयुगं स्मरणीयम् । <sl.abh...@gmail.com> wrote:

"क्त-क्तवतू" इत्यत्र तु द्विवचनमस्ति | अथ किं निष्ठा-शब्दस्य एकवचनमेव ?

तौ सत् इत्यत्रैव क्त-क्तवतू निष्ठासंज्ञौ भवतः इत्येवार्थः!

 

प्रायः अस्मिन् सूत्रे एकः प्रश्नः "निष्ठा इति किम् ?" तस्य उत्तरं "क्त-क्तवतू" ! तेन क्त-क्तवत्वोः यो भावः तदेव निष्ठा ! 

क्त-क्तवत्वोः यो भावः सः कथं निष्ठेति मन्तव्यः! तत्तु न जानामि !

कथमयमर्थो लब्ध इत्यहमपि न जानामि!

 

अनुगृहीतो भवामि सोदाहरणं दिग्दर्शनं भवति चेत् ! 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "samskrita" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to samskrita+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sams...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/samskrita.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Hnbhat B.R.]

निष्ठा इति क्त-क्तवतू प्रत्ययौ एवोच्येते इति क्त-क्तवतू निष्ठा इति सूत्रस्यार्थः! इति पूर्वमेवोक्तम्!

[KN.Ramesh]

Thanks a lot Prof.Dr.HN.Bhat ji..

It is said that one who does not confer the Vidya to other becomes a brahma rAkshasa.

A student of Patanjali became a brahma rAkshasa. To come out of this curse, he has to transfer the vidya, the mahA bhAshyam learnt from his Guru Patanjali to some good pupil.

He chose a strategic location the central part of india ie., between 5 gauda desa & 5 dravida desa so that probability of getting the person is very good.

The  brahmarakshasa sat on a peepal tree on the banks of river narmada and will ask the following questions to the passers by:

What is the nishthA pratyaya of  सिच् ? Answer सिक्तम् 

What is the nishthA pratyaya of  रच् ? Answer  रक्तम् 

What is the nishthA pratyaya of  भुज् ? Answer  भुक्तम् 

What is the nishthA pratyaya of  पच् ? Everybody will answer पक्तम् 

Then he will catch that brahmana- you are a good food for me today & eat him.

Once a brahmin named Chandra Sharma came that way. Brahma rAkshas asked the questions, he told the answer as पक्वम् .

BrahmarAkshas became happy and transferred the mahabhashyam with lot of strict conditions to him and became relieved of the sin.

It is said that unable to digest the pitiable state of his pupil, Patanjali himself came as Chandra Sharma. 

He took notes  from his guru Braham rakshas plucking the leaves of the peepal tree,using his blood as the ink. Some how some of the leaves were eaten away by  a goat. This portion is often referred as अज भक्षित भाग of mahAbhashyam.

This chandra sharma was from Gauda desa ( Present day bengal/Bihar) and later became the famous Gauda pAda the guru of Govinda bhagavat pada whose pupil was Adishankara bhagavat pada.

The story was told by HH.Chandrasekhara saraswati - mahaperiyavaa of Kanci mutt in one of his upanyasams.

My question is " Is the अज भक्षित भाग  still relevant? "

 In other words is it true that some portions of MahAbhAshyam  are missing  today....???

Namaskarams