Full verse requested.

32 views
Skip to first unread message

P.K.Ramakrishnan

unread,
May 15, 2011, 6:39:17 AM5/15/11
to samskrita
One of Sankaracharya's verses.

नमश्शिवाभ्यां  जटिलंधराभ्याम् 
परस्पराश्लिष्टवपुर्धराभ्याम्   /
-----------------------------
नमोनमश्शंकरपार्वतीभ्याम् //

Can some one provide the full verse?

Thanks in advance.
 
-----------------------------------
P.K.Ramakrishnan
http://peekayar.blogspot.com

hnbhat B.R.

unread,
May 15, 2011, 7:03:15 AM5/15/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com
नमः शिवाभ्यां नवयौवनाभ्यां 
परस्पराश्लिष्ट वपुर्द्धराभ्यां।
नगेन्द्रकन्या वृषकेतनाभ्यां
नमो नमः शङ्करपार्वतीभ्यां॥
namaḥ śivābhyāṁ navayauvanābhyāṁ 
parasparāśliṣṭa vapurddharābhyāṁ|
nagendrakanyā vṛṣaketanābhyāṁ
namo namaḥ śaṅkarapārvatībhyāṁ||

Here is the full verse. And here is the link to the complete stotra 

उमामहेश्वरस्तोत्रम् 




--
Dr. Hari Narayana Bhat B.R.
EFEO,
PONDICHERRY

P.K.Ramakrishnan

unread,
May 15, 2011, 10:08:07 AM5/15/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for the reply.  I was looking for a stanza containing the word 
jatilamdharabhyaam.  If there is none with this word I have to  disontinue the
discussion. 
-----------------------------------
P.K.Ramakrishnan
http://peekayar.blogspot.com



From: hnbhat B.R. <hnbh...@gmail.com>
To: sams...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, 15 May, 2011 4:33:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Samskrita] Full verse requested.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "samskrita" group.
To post to this group, send email to sams...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to samskrita+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/samskrita?hl=en.

hnbhat B.R.

unread,
May 15, 2011, 10:23:02 AM5/15/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com
I don't remember such a word in the whole stotra.

hnbhat B.R.

unread,
May 15, 2011, 10:35:15 AM5/15/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com
This is a similar Stotra where such not exactly identical phrase is found:

मन्दारमालाकलितालकायै कपालमालाङ्कितकन्धराय . दिव्याम्बरायै च दिगम्बराय नमः शिवायै च नमः शिवाय .. ५

Whole ardhanArIshvara stotra is availanble here:



First of all, the compound jaTilaMdhara seems to be impossible grammatically. 

P.K.Ramakrishnan

unread,
May 15, 2011, 10:45:10 AM5/15/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com
Why I was gathering this information was this. Many Years ago -may be 60 years -
my father had told me that according to his acquaintance who was teaching Sankara philosophy for many years he had found only one mistake in Sankaras
language which is  जटिलंधराभ्याम् instead of जटाधराभ्याम्.  If anyone has come
across this kindly let me know.
 
-----------------------------------
P.K.Ramakrishnan
http://peekayar.blogspot.com


Sent: Sun, 15 May, 2011 7:53:02 PM

Subject: Re: [Samskrita] Full verse requested.

I don't remember such a word in the whole stotra.


--
Dr. Hari Narayana Bhat B.R.
EFEO,
PONDICHERRY

hnbhat B.R.

unread,
May 15, 2011, 11:04:28 AM5/15/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com
Even if it is a grammatical archaic usage, it doesn't mean anything as jaTila itself meaning one having jaTA, and again jaTilaM dharatIti jaTilaMdhara > obsolete construction, like yugaMdhara, etc, taking it granted, it doesn't give the meaning jaTA-dhara as it is already conveyed by the word jaTila. - one having jaTA-s. as in the previous cited Stotra:


jaTilaM trinetraM - adjective for triNetra. 

That is why I said, the compound seems to be impossible in anyway to convey the meaning jaTAdhara.

With regards

Sunder Hattangadi

unread,
May 15, 2011, 8:36:52 PM5/15/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com
 
The word in fact does appear in the link, and also in the Samata Books edition of Complete Works:
 
नमः शिवाभ्यां जटिलन्धराभ्यां जरामृतिभ्यां च विवर्जिताभ्याम् ।
जनार्दब्जोद्भवपूजिताभ्यां - नमो नमः शंकरपार्वतीभ्याम् ।।                             


 
namaH shivaabhyaa.n jaTilandharabhyaam.h
jaraamR^itibhyaa.n cha vivarjitaabhyaam.h .
janaardanaabjodbhavapuujitaabhyaam.h
namo namaH sha~Nkarapaarvatiibhyaam.h .. 10..
 
Regards,
 
sunder
 
 
 
 
 

From: P.K.Ramakrishnan <peek...@yahoo.com>
To: sams...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Samskrita] Full verse requested.

Thanks for the reply.  I was looking for a stanza containing the word 
jatilamdharabhyaam.  If there is none with this word I have to  disontinue the
discussion. 
-----------------------------------
P.K.Ramakrishnan
http://peekayar.blogspot.com

Raghunathan Kuppuswamy

unread,
May 15, 2011, 5:09:29 PM5/15/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com, tel...@gmail.com
ur blog was interesting. but no updates after 08?

hnbhat B.R.

unread,
May 15, 2011, 10:16:45 PM5/15/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com
Sorry. I din't notice it.


"जटिलन्धराभ्यां"
यथाश्रुते न को ऽप्यर्थः स्फुरति। जटिलशब्दस्यैव जटान्ताविति बोधात्, तद्धारणे केवलस्य विशेषणस्य कर्मत्वायोगात्। 
जटिकन्धराभ्यामिति तु स्यात्
उभयोरपि जटाधारित्वमेव चिन्त्यम्, उमायाः कबरीभारस्यैवौचित्यात्
कन्धरस्य। जटिनौ कन्धरौ ययोस्तयोः इति बहुव्रीहौ तु अर्थसंगतिस्तु स्यादेव, वृथा आचार्याणामपभ्रंशप्रयोगापादनापेक्षया।

2011/5/16 Sunder Hattangadi <sun...@yahoo.com>

hnbhat B.R.

unread,
May 15, 2011, 10:21:25 PM5/15/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com
जनार्दब्जोद्भवपूजिताभ्यां 

इत्यत्र जनार्दनाब्जोद्भव-

इति साधीयान् पाठश्च। जटिन्धराभ्याम्
इत्यत्रापि तादृश एव लेखकप्रमादेन ककारस्थाने लकारः संभाव्यते।

Vimala Sarma

unread,
May 16, 2011, 2:04:28 AM5/16/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com

I think from the dual endings this is addressed to ArdhanArIshvara.

I have this is a song I think but I have to listen to it to transcribe it.

CVimala

 

From: sams...@googlegroups.com [mailto:sams...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Raghunathan Kuppuswamy
Sent: Monday, 16 May 2011 7:09 AM
To: sams...@googlegroups.com
Cc: tel...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Samskrita] Full verse requested.

 

ur blog was interesting. but no updates after 08?

श्रीमल्ललितालालितः

unread,
May 16, 2011, 9:56:37 AM5/16/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com




On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:34, Vimala Sarma <vsa...@bigpond.com> wrote:

I think from the dual endings this is addressed to ArdhanArIshvara.

I have this is a song I think but I have to listen to it to transcribe it.

CVimala

द्विवचनान्नैकस्यार्धनारीश्वरस्य नमनविषयत्वम् । अत एव पृथग्देहवतोरुमामहेश्वरयोरेवेयं स्तुतिः । उमामहेश्वरस्तुतिरित्याख्यापि तदनुकूला ।
नन्वर्धनारीश्वरस्तोत्रेऽपि 'नमः शिवायै च नमः शिवाय' - इति चकारेण समुच्चयदर्शनादर्द्धनारीश्वरविषयत्वं न स्यादिति ।
न । यद्यपि तत्रापि पृथगेव स्तूयेते ते पृथङ्नमउक्त्या । अथापि विवक्षावशाद्देहार्द्धस्थितयोरेव तथात्वेनार्द्धनारीश्वरस्तुतित्वम् ।
तथैवात्राप्यस्त्विति चेत् । न । देहार्द्धस्थितयोस्तयोरियं स्तुतिरित्यत्र ज्ञापकस्याख्यादेरभावात् ।
 

murthy

unread,
May 15, 2011, 11:17:38 PM5/15/11
to sams...@googlegroups.com
Perhaps it should be
जनार्दनाब्जोद्भवपूजिताभ्याम्
Regards
Murthy
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages