System Software Overview shows '64-bit Kernel and Extensions: Yes'.As I said I used to run it with 32-bit but I changed that with a keyboard combination. In contrast to the other guys from the link you posted I've successfully installed the 64-bit dmg. But building sage 5.1 from source code somehow doesn't work for me..
Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 05:00:58 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
On Saturday, 28 July 2012 01:55:13 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:Hmmh, I have a macbook pro mid 2009, Core 2 Duo. Some Core 2 Duos mis-represent themselves as 64 bit? How could I check wether my machine does that? It used to run under 32-bit, but than I switched it to 64-bit via an official apple command. The systemprofiler states 64-bit...What does System Software Overview show for you? I suppose that you see64-bit Kernel and Extensions: No
This was discussed here and on sage-devel a little while ago, as it is indeed confusing: the processor is 64-bit, but the kernel is 32 bit. While some(?) 64-bit executables can be still run, it is still a 32-bit kernel... See
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-support/IfJCisKo7Ao/nlQyZeB8DgAJ
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-support/IfJCisKo7Ao/Z4Vj5TmUimYJ
PS. Sorry, John, it could be that googlegroups are not as capable of changing the subject as we wish :(
As far as I know, the only way to get a 64-bit kernel for Core 2 Duo is to upgrade to OSX 10.7.
Am Freitag, 27. Juli 2012 07:35:32 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
On Friday, 27 July 2012 03:56:27 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:I also use Xcode 3.2.6 (freshly installed) , but building always crashed when gcc 4.6.3 was going to be installed on my machine.I figured that I could install the gcc package manually, downloaded it and ran the installation...with the same result.really don't know what the problem is...what is the hardware you are using?On OSX 6, some machines mis-represent themselves as 64-bit, although the system is in fact 32-bit.(e.g. Core 2 Duo ones do this)So if you try to build in a "true" 64-bit mode, it won't work then.
Am Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2012 16:13:58 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
On Thursday, 26 July 2012 14:21:29 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:Ok, thanks guys. I switched methods and installed with the mac osx binaries.seems that I have serious issues updating my current gcc compiler.guess I'll just have to wait until apple updates xcode.this is strange. I think many people, including several very active Sage developers,work on OSX 10.6.8 with XCode, and not having any issues. Provided it is Xcode 3.2.6.What version of Xcode do you use?cheersdoro
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 13:08:40 UTC+2 schrieb kfiz:re-installed XCode. this time:/usr/bin/ranlib: archive member: libbackend.a(ude) size too large (archive member extends past the end of the file)ar: internal ranlib command failedmake[5]: *** [libbackend.a] Error 1make[4]: *** [all-stage2-gcc] Error 2make[3]: *** [stage2-bubble] Error 2make[2]: *** [all] Error 2real 56m5.026suser 50m8.913ssys 2m44.951s************************************************************************Error installing package gcc-4.6.3
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 12:08:11 UTC+2 schrieb kfiz:I have the newest version of command line tools...but I'll re-download XCode and try again, just to check.
Am Mittwoch, 25. Juli 2012 11:51:37 UTC+2 schrieb Jeroen Demeyer:On 2012-07-25 11:32, kfiz wrote:
> downloaded the source code from source and tried again, and got this:
Weird, are you sure your XCode setup is up-to-date?
A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that works on32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 and x86_64) systems.
2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik <dim...@gmail.com>A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that works on32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 and x86_64) systems.
IIRC universal binaries should also include PPC. Am I right?
> Hmmm, that seems to exactly be my bug. Yes, Dima I downloaded Xcode 3.2.6 from apple devel, but from page 4 of 7..? Are we refering to different download sections?
So, what's the smartest thing to do here..smart meaning without to much effort. ;-).
deleted everything but I'll just try to build it again, then I'll post the log.