Rack::Bug for Rails 2.2.1

8 views
Skip to first unread message

cipher_neo

unread,
Jul 7, 2011, 4:09:03 AM7/7/11
to Ruby on Rails: Talk
Rack::Bug (https://github.com/brynary/rack-bug) is a tool for
profiling rails apps to find bottlenecks in the code.

It has a really nice HTML interface that you can access on the
production server.

The problem is that I am running an app on Rails version 2.2.1 and
Rack::Bug will not run on such an old version of Rails.

Can anyone recommend an equivalent plug-in for that version of rails?

thanks,

Lee

cipher_neo

unread,
Jul 10, 2011, 2:25:27 AM7/10/11
to Ruby on Rails: Talk
anoyone?

cipher_neo

unread,
Jul 15, 2011, 2:37:06 AM7/15/11
to Ruby on Rails: Talk
bump bump

On Jul 10, 7:25 am, cipher_neo <l33...@gmail.com> wrote:
> anoyone?
>

Jazmin

unread,
Jul 15, 2011, 8:46:37 AM7/15/11
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
Same here.. I have an app running 2.2 and can't find something similar to Rack::Bug. 
At some point we had newrelic developer mode working so you might want to try that, just keep in mind that newer versions of newrelic will probably not work with rails 2.2.x

If I find something I will post it. :)


bump bump
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-ta...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.




--
Jazmin

cipher_neo

unread,
Jul 15, 2011, 11:43:47 AM7/15/11
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
ok, thanks, I am gonna try out the free 14 day trial of newrelic and see how it goes!

Hassan Schroeder

unread,
Jul 15, 2011, 11:50:25 AM7/15/11
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:43 AM, cipher_neo <l33...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok, thanks, I am gonna try out the free 14 day trial of newrelic and see how
> it goes!

OK, I wasn't going to say anything because I haven't used Rack::Bug
but if NewRelic (which I do use) is somewhat equivalent you might also
find the rails-footnotes gem useful.

(<http://rubygems.org/gems/rails-footnotes>)

HTH,
--
Hassan Schroeder ------------------------ hassan.s...@gmail.com
http://about.me/hassanschroeder
twitter: @hassan

cipher_neo

unread,
Jul 18, 2011, 3:44:19 AM7/18/11
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
I have set up newrelic rpm and it is exactly what I was looking for.

Really in depth info about what is goin on in the code.

It has helped to me to find some places in the code that needed some tweaking and has helped reduce average response times.

I have done a quick search on footnotes, but still not quite sure what exactly it provides except for links back to the code?
Are you saying it could be used alongside newrelic?

Hassan Schroeder

unread,
Jul 18, 2011, 9:10:49 AM7/18/11
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:44 AM, cipher_neo <l33...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have done a quick search on footnotes, but still not quite sure what
> exactly it provides except for links back to the code?
> Are you saying it could be used alongside newrelic?

The information provided is similar, but no, there's probably no reason
to use both. And obviously NewRelic offers more, especially if you get
a higher-level paid account.

cipher_neo

unread,
Jul 19, 2011, 4:15:03 AM7/19/11
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
I will try our newrelic for now anyway thanks
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages