On Jan 22, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2013, at 1:15 PM, Osifo Anosike wrote:
>> "Андрей Большов" <
asno...@gmail.com> wrote in post #1093053:
>>> What about:
>>> rake -T
>>> rake --version
>>>
>>> in common rake always print out some results, try run your command with
>>> `--trace`. If you have blank output for `rake -T` and got output `rake
>>> --version` then my guess is that you have `exit` somewhere in you
>>> app(try
>>> see in rakefile)
>>>
>>>
>>> , 21 2013 ., 19:01:23 UTC+4 Ruby-Forum.com
>>> User :
>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot! I ran with rake -t (this time from the root of my
>> cucumber features directory), what i got was: "rake aborted! "You have
>> already activated rake 10.0.3 but your gem file requires 10.0.2 run
>> bundle exec may resolve this.
>> I ran bundle exec, but still the same error. I followed the stack
>> trace, but could not understand the line of code pointed to.
>>
>> Please permit my being amateur, and thanks in anticipation for your
>> reply!
> ----
But before you do all that typing, perhaps just put ./bin at the front of you PATH and run bundler like:
Then those binaries for the gems will be installed to ./bin/ and you won't have to prefix everything with `bundle exec` to get the benefit of the bundled gems.