Jason Hsu, Android developer wrote in post #1108629:
> I learned Drupal before learning Rails. A Drupal newbie can get up to
> speed much faster than a Rails newbie, but Rails has so many
> capabilities
> that Drupal doesn't have. Rails offers dynamic capability, automated
> testing, and the option of using version control (which makes it much
> easier to back up a site).
I have not worked with either Django or Drupal, but have worked with a
good number of other software development frameworks. I simply wanted to
add that comparing Drupal to Rails is irrelevant. They are not the same
thing. Rails is a general purpose web development framework, whereas
Drupal is a Content Management System (CMS). While it is possible to
extend CMS systems with extension code that is still not a fair
comparison to a general purpose development kit like Rails.
This is akin to the the comparisons between Rails and PHP that you often
see. This is also not a fair comparison. PHP is programming language
where Rails is a development framework that happens to be written in
Ruby. It would be fair to compare PHP with Ruby.
Modern software is generally built in layers. The basic layers being the
underlying programming language (e.g. Ruby, PHP, Python), the
development framework (e.g. Rails, Django, CakePHP), then what I'll call
the application layer.
The application layer could be your application, as is likely the case
for a Rails application, or it could be a higher level abstraction like
a CMS (Drupal, Radiant CMS, etc.). A CMS might then allow for an even
higher extension or plugin layer. Every layer above the foundational
language is optional. For example Drupal may sit directly on top of PHP,
but that doesn't put it in the same category as something like Rails or
Django.
--
Posted via
http://www.ruby-forum.com/.