HOW SAINT FRANCIS XAVIER TORTURED AND MURDERED HINDUS FOR BEING HINDU

[FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer]

http://rightlog.in/2017/04/terror-saint-francis-xavier-inquisition/

Unveiling the Unsaintly side of Saint Francis Xavier

Kapil Routray - April 7, 2017

Let me tell our dear readers a story. A story of a simple man named Dr
Paul Joseph Goebbels.




Dr Goebbels was a humble, studious, thoughtful man. A doctor of
Philosophy, he was academically gifted and scholastically talented. A
man of varied talents, he distinguished himself in the Arts, Literature,
Oratory, History, and Theology. A keen student of Science, he utilized
the then modern technology to spread the word of his Lord and Master
across the civilized World. He created institutions to popularize his
Lord’s words. He helped set up the foundations of a successful,
prosperous new society. He guarded this new World by creating
organizations to weed out the dissidents creating trouble in his new
paradise.

He did this by devastating centuries of culture and tradition. He did
this by reducing beautiful cities and gardens to dust. He did this by
butchering millions of innocent men, women, and children- merely for
their faith. He did this by setting up death camps where new and more
horrifying atrocities were dreamed of every day by sadistic, monstrous
beasts in human flesh. He did this by making a sport of Death, all in
the honour of his perverse ideology and his demonic Lord.




Dr Goebbels, for these great deeds and noble accomplishments, has since
been honoured highly. Hundreds of schools have been raised across the
length and breadth of the World in his name. Thousands of young men go
forth in his name to preach the word of their Lord. Dozens of seminaries
and monasteries dedicate years in training young men and women of his
methods and ideas. Millions are spent every day to promote his worldview
and message. And as if all this were not enough, Dr Goebbels has been
acclaimed as a ‘Saint’, and thus the object of veneration by the
billions of people who follow the words of his Lord.
Thus let us all praise Dr Goebbels, bringer of Light and Truth and the
word of his Lord to billions.


I apologize.
It seems I have made a mistake.
I wasn’t talking about Dr Goebbels, the Minister of Propaganda during
the Third Reich.
I was talking about the great Christian Saint, Francis Xavier.

Francis Xavier- whose birth anniversary falls today (April 7th) is quite
likely one of the most overhyped “saints” ever.




The bloodshed and violence unleashed by this him has had few equals in
history- and yet, this he is honoured each day by millions of
Christians, even in India. Even today, millions of innocent Hindu
children are force-fed lies on the ‘greatness’ of this so called great
saint.

The rise of Christianity in India in the 16th Century had long been
marked by brutality and violence of the worst order with European
priests and their pet armies regularly attacking and massacring Hindu
communities- but the prevailing horror was first standardized by the
great Christian Saint Francis Xavier when in 1545, he suggested the
creation of an Inquisition in Goa to King John III of Portugal. In 1560,
the Goa Inquisition was set up in a massive palace, originally occupied
by Goa’s Sultan- and then the horror began.

And all thanks to the great Christian saint, Francis Xavier.

Horrific tortures were devised daily so that the Inquisitors could carry
out their duties diligently and easily. The ingenuity of these
inquisitors can easily be seen in the tortures devised by them. One of
their creations was the so-called ‘Rack’- a system of Pulleys designed
to tear the limbs of Hindus apart, described in contemporary accounts.
The ‘Strappado’ was yet another device used to break legs and knees. Nor
were Hindu women ignored. In a brilliant example of the feminist ideal
of equality, Hindu women were treated to the joys of the
‘Breast-Ripper’, an iron vice which was heated red-hot and used to tear
out breasts. The influence of texts like the Malleus Maleficarum- Hammer
of Witches- written a mere two generations ago is evident here.

And all thanks to the great Christian saint, Francis Xavier.

Nor was physical torture the only mode used to persecute Hindus by
Xavier and his goons at the Inquisition. Open practice of Hinduism was
made punishable by death; even mere suspicion of such was the cause for
torture and enslavement. Tens of thousands of Hindus were murdered or
worked to death in mines, ships, and factories- often starved or beaten
to death by Christian supervisors.

Cultural genocide was also a prime mode the Inquisition utilized. Across
the Konkan coast, any book written in any Indian languages- especially
Sanskrit and Marathi- was rooted out and destroyed, irrespective of
subject matter. By 1548, a letter by Joao de Albuquerque proudly
declares the task to be almost complete. In 1557, it was declared that
any Christian convert would automatically be guaranteed one-third of
their Hindu family’s property- and also, ‘further portions thereof on
the father’s death’. In 1559, even the marginal attempt at justice was
done away with- and only Christians could inherit property. Ultimately
in 1684, the Konkani language itself was banned.

Much like in modern Pakistan, Hindu marriages were not recognized– thus
making all Hindu children effectively bastards and thus with limited
legal rights. The rights of Hindus to practise their customs, keep
fasts, worship their gods, and even be brunt after death were declared
illegal. BY 1567, over 300 Hindu temples over the Konkan Coast had been
reduced to dust. Thousands of years of Art, Sculpture, and Tradition
were wiped out. An Orwellian state where Hindus were encouraged to first
convert and then betray their families to the merciless inquisitors
sprang up.



In multiple regions along the western coast of India, Hindus were even
denied the right to keep Hindu names- the effect of which can still be
seen in the pidgin Western names proudly flaunted about by ignorant
Liberals to this day.

And all thanks to the great Christian saint, Francis Xavier.

Nor do claims that the Inquisition was driven by political, and not
religious, considerations hold any water whatsoever. Dellon describes
the scope and power of the Inquisition perfectly: ‘The Grand Inquisitor
alone… receives more respect than the Archbishop or the Viceroy…. He can
cause any of them to be arrested… ( after) receiving secret orders from
the ‘Conselho Supremo’ (Head Inquisition at Lisbon’. It is evident that
Political power flowed from religious Authority, rather than vice versa.

When one considers this, it is easy to see why Francis Xavier’s
brilliant record in converting the ‘savage heathen’ failed the minute he
left devastated colonial India and tiny South East Asian islands to land
in centralized Japan. The Japanese, in the vast majority of cases,
ignored Xavier’s preaching entirely- primarily because unlike in India,
there were no massive Portuguese armies in Japan to force the Japanese
to see the ‘Truth’.

Nor are claims that Francis Xavier was ignorant of the Inquisition’s
actions any less absurd. Readers should remember that the Inquisition
had a long history in Europe long before it came to India. It is clear
that Francis Xavier would have been perfectly familiar with the methods
of this organizations; it would have been absurd if he wasn’t- since
Xavier was a member of the Inquisition himself in Europe. In 1540, the
young Xavier was a note participant in the first Auto-da-Fe celebrated
in Portugal where two innocent people were cruelly burnt alive.

And all thanks to the great Christian saint, Francis Xavier.

Francis Xavier’s popularity among unthinking ‘modern’ Hindus, drunk on
their own ‘education’ is as stunning as it is horrifying. There is no
lack of sophisticated, modern Indian youth flaunting their erudition and
cosmopolitanism, eager to sip from the goblet of deracination. And why not?

Brahmin hatred is a cornerstone of modern Indian hatred. And wasn’t it
Xavier who wrote: – ‘‘I want to free the poor Hindus from the
stranglehold of the Brahmins and destroy the places where evil spirits
(HINDU GODS) are worshipped… The poor people do exactly what the
Brahmins tell them…. If there were no Brahmins in the area, all Hindus
would accept conversion to our faith.”

Idol worship is ‘uncool’ according to modern Indian Youth, drunk on
‘civilization’ and ‘culture’. And wasn’t it Xavier who wrote: – ‘Order
that everywhere the temples of the false gods be pulled down and the
idols broken. I know not how to describe in words the joy that I feel
before the spectacle of pulling down and destroying the idols…’

This temple-destroying fellow is now a Saint, praised and worshipped by
the great agents of the Christian Church in India. And why not?

There are certain ‘Comedy’ groups in India which are known for routinely
expressing their base desires to fornicate with their mothers, sisters,
dogs, manatees, and other creatures. They regularly and unapologetically
insult and disdain the Hindu faith. However, when they did the same to
Christianity, they had to travel to meet a certain high-ranking Church
official to grovel at his feet for mercy. Ask yourself.

There is no lack of Atheists and Communists in India who spare not one
opportunity to mock Hindus and our gods as ‘illogical’ and ‘ignorant’
both online and in real life. But readers will note that their entire
ire has always been limited to Hinduism and Hinduism alone. Why? Because
unlike Hindus, other religions kill people for mocking them. Readers are
encouraged to google the name ‘Sanal Edamaruku’ here. Ask yourself.

Why is Kamlesh Tiwari in prison while intellectuals strut about in
public insulting and attacking Shri Rama? Ask yourself.

Why are Hindu schools alone being targeted under the absurd RTE Act
while the so-called pro-Hindu Modi regime remains unconcerned? Ask yourself.

Why Hindu temples are alone kept under the purview of unreliable
government officials, many of whom aren’t even Hindu themselves while
other faiths have full reign over their sites of worship? Ask yourself?

Why don’t NCERT or ICSE ever educated children on the horrors of
Christian persecution of Hindus in India? Ask yourself.

Why has there been so little word on the hundreds of Hindu temples
turned into powder by the Church in Goa and in multiple other areas? Ask
yourself.

Then- why should it be a surprise that this very day, children from St.
Xavier’s School in small Duliajan, Assam to St Xavier’s College, Mumbai
to the famed Xavier School of Management, Jamshedpur will gather to a
worship and extol Francis Xavier who was anything but a saint? Why
should it be a surprise that one of the bloodiest chapters in Indian
history has been hidden for decades by our education system?

Ask yourself- and you’ll find that you already know the answer.

[RH156RH]

Thank God for the British Raj ....RH

[FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer]

Yep....British Raj proved that EVIL CHRISTIAN TERRORISTS and MURDERERS
are NO BETTER than MUSLIM TERRORISTS.

[RH156RH]

What a tragedy that the British removed their firm colonial guiding hand in 1947... Rh

[FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer]

What a great tragedy your mom didn't swallow instead.

[RH156RH]

Yet more evidence vividly displayed of the tragedy which was the ending of the Raj... RH

[hari seldon]

On 07-04-17 23:31, FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer wrote:
>
>
> http://rightlog.in/2017/04/terror-saint-francis-xavier-inquisition/
>
> Unveiling the Unsaintly side of Saint Francis Xavier
>
> Kapil Routray - April 7, 2017
>
> Let me tell our dear readers a story. A story of a simple man named Dr
> Paul Joseph Goebbels.
>
>
>
>
> Dr Goebbels was a humble, studious, thoughtful man. A doctor of
> Philosophy, he was academically gifted and scholastically talented. A
> man of varied talents, he distinguished himself in the Arts, Literature,
> Oratory, History, and Theology. A keen student of Science, he utilized
> the then modern technology to spread the word of his Lord and Master
> across the civilized World. He created institutions to popularize his
> Lord’s words. He helped set up the foundations of a successful,
> prosperous new society. He guarded this new World by creating
> organizations to weed out the dissidents creating trouble in his new
> paradise.
>
> He did this by devastating centuries of culture and tradition. He did
> this by reducing beautiful cities and gardens to dust. He did this by
> butchering millions of innocent men, women, and children- merely for
> their faith. He did this by setting up death camps where new and more
> horrifying atrocities were dreamed of every day by sadistic, monstrous
> beasts in human flesh. He did this by making a sport of Death, all in
> the honour of his perverse ideology and his demonic Lord.
>
>

Emotions are not the same as history.

[cyrila...@gmail.com]

When one studies Hinduism he finds that Hinduism is the most obscene Religion devoid of morality and is rampant with containing too much superstition, Misogyny,rape, Bestiality, Necrophilia,Incest,Stealing, Genocide, Violence, Child sacrifice, Animal sacrifice, Gang Rape, Murder, Deceit is all essential teachings of hinduism
Here's extract of teachings of Hinduism from it's own holy books :
BESTIALITY IN HINDUISM (RAPE OF ANIMALS)


Brahma's Bestiality with a Bear
Brahma, the main god of the Vedic religion, was so lecherous that he was not
satisfied even after sexually molesting  his own 6 year old daughter Saraswati. In fact, feelings of lust crept up when he saw
even females of animal species ! He was so frustrated that he copulated with a
bear :

Puranas

”Brahma started roaming about in forests. He happened to see a female bear
in a bush. Brahma would not leave it. He went straight to the bear. The female
bear yielded to Brahma’s lust. God Brahma enjoyed the bear, and a human being
with the head of a bear was born. He was called Jambu Vandan, the son of
Brahma. “
-( Puran )


2. Cow is sacred in Hinduism because it was the bread and butter earner for primarily the cattle herders that Aryans were (originally Aryans were nomadic cattle herders from Europe and Central Asia),Cows were also used as sexual pleasure object, Cow was exploited and used in any ways possible even for sexual pleasures, in Hinduism women are considered unpure and evil  hence female infanticide was widespread and therefore there was general lack of population of women and girls, therefore to satisfy their sexual lust and carnal desires Ancient Hindus such as Rishi's used to have sex with Cows. Here's proof from Hindu Holy books sanctioning sex with Animals : Reference: Rig Veda>> Section(Mandala):1>> Chapter(HYMN):121>> Verse 2
Online Source:http://www.indianscriptures.com/scriptures/vedas/rig-veda/mandala-i/topic-121


RAPE AND SEXUAL MOLESTATION IN HINDUISM


# Hindu god Brahma raped his own little 6 year old daughter Saraswati and was a sex maniac and pervert who was guilty of Rape,incest(sex with own daughters, mothers,sisters,brothers) bestiality (sex with animals), necrophilia (sex with dead bodies)
,pedophilia and sexual molestation,
Brahma raped his own 6 year old daughter Saraswati not once or twice but several times and also begetted children with her.


Here's proof from Hindu holy books:-

Brhadaranyaka Upanisad 1:4:2-6.:

"Brahma’s daughter Sarasvati said to herself,“After begetting me from his own body, how could he copulate/have sex with me? I know, I’ll hide myself.’ So she became a cow. But he(Brahma) became a bull and copulated/raped her. From their union cattle were born. Then she became a mare, and he a stallion; she became a female donkey, and he, a male donkey. And again he copulated with her, and from their union one-hoofed animals were born. Then she became a female goat, and he, a male goat; she became an ewe, and he, a ram. And again he copulated with her, and from their union goats and sheep were born. In this way he created every male and female pair that exists, down to the very ants.… Then he churned like this and, using his hands, produced fire from his mouth as from a vagina. As a result the inner sides of both these — the hands and the mouth — are without hair, for the inside of the vagina is without hair.”
-Brhadaranyaka Upanisad 1:4:2-6.

Rape of 6 year old daughter Saraswati and Incest and perpetual lies by Hindu god Brahma is attested in various ancient holy Hindu books.
"Brahma desired Sarasvati and went to her, asking her to stay with him. She, being his daughter, was furious at this and said, 'Your mouth speaks inauspiciously and so you will always speak in a contrary way.' From that day, Brahma's fifth head always spoke evilly and coarsely. Therefore one day when Siva was wandering about with Parvati and came to see Brahma, Brahma's four heads praised Siva but the fifth made an evil sound. Siva, displeased with the fifth head, cut it off. The skull remained stuck fast to Siva's hand, and though he was capable of burning it up, Siva wandered the earth with it for the sake of all people, until he came to Benares." -- Siva Purana, Jnanasamhita 49:65-80.


Yet another holy book says a narrative:

“On seeing his daughter Padma (Sarasvati),  Brahma was very much moved. He looked at the beauty of his daughter. He wooed his daughter and wanted to have intercourse. How could a daughter give consent to one’s own father? Padma refused. Brahma did not give up his desire. He began to quote the Vedas to his daughter to make her realise that there is nothing wrong in enjoying with anyone, anytime, anywhere for the sake of giving birth to a child”:

“Mathara Mupathya, susara mupaithe, Puthrartheetha
Sagamarthi, Napathra loka, nasthee thath.
Saravam paravo vindu ha, dasmath Puthrar tham
Matharam suransathee Rahathee.”

This is the Sanskrit sloka Brahma quoted to his daughter. He explained to his daughter, that for the sake of a child one can enjoy with one’s own sister or daughter, as per the authority of the sacred Vedas composed by Brahmin scholar.
Brahma's Incest With Sarasvati
The savage Vedic Aryans who invaded India practiced widespread incest,
cannibalism, sati and other barbarities. It is hence no surprise that the main
Vedic god also displayed animal characteristics. He had incest with his own
daughter, an act that is perfectly legal in Vedic law :


" Brahma is one of the 3 main gods - Trimurti - of the Hindu pantheon. He is
the creator of the universe. Sarasvati, who became the wife of her own father,
was the daughter of Brahma. There are 2 stories about her genesis in the
`Saraswati Purana'. One is that Brahma created his beautiful daughter Saraswati
direct from his `vital strength' or seminal fluid. The other is that Brahma
used to collect his semen in a pot whenever he masturbated fixing his
carnal eyes on the celestial beauty Urvasi. Brahma's semen in the pot gave
birth to the sage Agastya, and Agastya in turn gave birth to Saraswati. Thus,
Saraswati had no mother.
" This daughter or grand-daughter of Brahma is the Hindu goddess of learning.
When Brahma saw the beauty of Saraswati he became amorous. To escape from her
father's passionate approach Saraswati ran to the lands in all four directions,
but she could not escape from her father. She succumbed to Brahma's wish.
Brahma and his daughter Saraswati lived as husband and wife indulging in incest
for 100 years. They had a son Swayambhumaru and a daughter
Satarupa. THrough the incest of Brahma's son and daughter Brahma got two
grandsons and two grand-daughters."
( Kovoor, p.76 )

The legend is given in the following `sacred' Vedic texts ( Spellman, p.28 ):

Aitareya Brahmana.III.33
Satapatha Brahmana.I.7.4.1ff; XIV, 4.2.1ff;
Matsya Purana.III.32 ff;
Bhagavata Purana.III.12.28ff.

Justification of Incest
In all these `holy' scriptures, this act of unrestrained incest is justified
and upheld as a legal act !

" Brahma followed Savitri [ Sarasvati ], married her, and they lived together
in a lotus for one hundred years. The Purana [ Matsya ] then points out that no
question arises regarding prohibited acts of the gods since they do not reap
the fruits of their karma (actions) as do mortals. A further justification of
Brahma's action is given by noting that Brahma is the lord of the Vedas and
Savitri is the goddess of the Vedas. They therefore are
inseparable, and to unite the Vedas with the sacred prayer can surely be no
evil."
( Spellman, p.30 )
However, the Vedas, which carry far more authority than the Puranic and
Brahmanic texts cited above, enjoin this practice. Incest, far from being a
`corruption' introduced after the Vedic Dark Ages, was thus a common practice
during that age of barbarism and illiteracy, and is a Hindu institution
perfectly sanctioned in the Vedas.

Vedic Sanction of Incest
One of the most irrefutable facts proving that Hinduism is evil right at its
very foundation is the fact that the Vedas justify the beastly act of incest as
a `sacred act'. This was no doubt an outcome of the strict practice of
`brahmacharya' which produced hoards of sexually starved psychopathic sadhus.
It is these mad sadhu Brahmins, the authors of the concocted Vedas, who
justified and legalised incast. Indeed, the Vedas enjoin incest as a kind of
marriage. This fact was utilised by Brahma when convincing his daughter
Sarasvati (also known as Padma) to succumb to his unlimited lust :

" 8. On seeing his beautiful daughter Padma, Brahma was sexually excited. He
wooed his daughter and wanted to copulate with her. How could a daughter give
consent to her own father? Padma refused. Brahma could not give up his desire.
He began to quote the Vedas to convince her that there was nothing wrong in
having sex with anyone, anytime, anywhere for the sake of giving birth to a
child. "
-- ( Puran )
This is the Vedic verse in Sanskrit which justifies incest and which was quoted
by Brahma :
“Mathara Mupathya, susara Mupatithe, Puthrartheetha.
Sagamarthi, Napathra loka, nasthee thath.
Saravam paravo vindu ha, dasmath Puthrar tham.
Matharam suransathee Rehathee”
- ( Veda, cited in Puran )
Tranlated this verse means
" For the sake of a child one can enjoy his own sister or daughter, without any
sin attached to it. "
( Puran )


# According to Hindu holy books Hindu God Brahma raped a wild Bear, there for Brahma was a sexual molester of wild animals.


Brahma's Bestiality with a Bear
Brahma, the main god of the Vedic religion, was so lecherous that he was not
satisfied with his own daughter. In fact, feelings of lust crept up when he saw
even females of animal species ! He was so frustrated that he copulated with a
bear :
" 11. Brahma started roaming about in forests. He happened to see a female bear
in a bush. Brahma would not leave it. He went straight to the bear. The female
bear yielded to Brahma’s lust. God Brahma enjoyed the bear, and a human being
with the head of a bear was born. He was called Jambu Vandan, the son of
Brahma. “
-( Puran )


INCEST IN HINDUISM(SEX WITH BLOOD RELATIVES SUCH AS BIOLOGICAL DAUGHTER, SISTER,BROTHER,MOTHER,FATHER):

# According to Hindu holy books Hindu god Brahma raped his own little 6 year old daughter Saraswati and was a sex maniac and pervert who was guilty of Rape,incest(sex with own daughters, mothers,sisters,brothers) bestiality (sex with animals), necrophilia (sex with dead bodies)
,pedophilia and sexual molestation,
Brahma raped his own 6 year old daughter Saraswati not once or twice but several times and also begetted children with her.


Here's proof from Hindu holy books

-Brhadaranyaka Upanisad 1:4:2-6.

"Brahma’s daughter Sarasvati said to herself,“After begetting me from his own body, how could he copulate/have sex with me? I know, I’ll hide myself.’ So she became a cow. But he(Brahma) became a bull and copulated/raped her. From their union cattle were born. Then she became a mare, and he a stallion; she became a female donkey, and he, a male donkey. And again he copulated with her, and from their union one-hoofed animals were born. Then she became a female goat, and he, a male goat; she became an ewe, and he, a ram. And again he copulated with her, and from their union goats and sheep were born. In this way he created every male and female pair that exists, down to the very ants.… Then he churned like this and, using his hands, produced fire from his mouth as from a vagina. As a result the inner sides of both these — the hands and the mouth — are without hair, for the inside of the vagina is without hair.”
-Brhadaranyaka Upanisad 1:4:2-6.

Rape of 6 year old daughter Saraswati and Incest and perpetual lies by Hindu god Brahma is attested in various ancient holy Hindu books.

“On seeing his daughter Padma (Sarasvati),  Brahma was very much moved. He looked at the beauty of his daughter. He wooed his daughter and wanted to have intercourse. How could a daughter give consent to one’s own father? Padma refused. Brahma did not give up his desire. He began to quote the Vedas to his daughter to make her realise that there is nothing wrong in enjoying with anyone, anytime, anywhere for the sake of giving birth to a child”:

“Mathara Mupathya, susara mupaithe, Puthrartheetha
Sagamarthi, Napathra loka, nasthee thath.
Saravam paravo vindu ha, dasmath Puthrar tham
Matharam suransathee Rahathee.”

This is the Sanskrit sloka Brahma quoted to his daughter. He explained to his daughter, that for the sake of a child one can enjoy with one’s own sister or daughter, as per the authority of the sacred Vedas composed by Brahmin scholar.
Brahma's Incest With Sarasvati
The savage Vedic Aryans who invaded India practiced widespread incest,
cannibalism, sati and other barbarities. It is hence no surprise that the main
Vedic god also displayed animal characteristics. He had incest with his own
daughter, an act that is perfectly legal in Vedic law :


" Brahma is one of the 3 main gods - Trimurti - of the Hindu pantheon. He is
the creator of the universe. Sarasvati, who became the wife of her own father,
was the daughter of Brahma. There are 2 stories about her genesis in the
`Saraswati Purana'. One is that Brahma created his beautiful daughter Saraswati
direct from his `vital strength' or seminal fluid. The other is that Brahma
used to collect his semen in a pot whenever he masturbated fixing his
carnal eyes on the celestial beauty Urvasi. Brahma's semen in the pot gave
birth to the sage Agastya, and Agastya in turn gave birth to Saraswati. Thus,
Saraswati had no mother.
" This daughter or grand-daughter of Brahma is the Hindu goddess of learning.
When Brahma saw the beauty of Saraswati he became amorous. To escape from her
father's passionate approach Saraswati ran to the lands in all four directions,
but she could not escape from her father. She succumbed to Brahma's wish.
Brahma and his daughter Saraswati lived as husband and wife indulging in incest
for 100 years. They had a son Swayambhumaru and a daughter
Satarupa. THrough the incest of Brahma's son and daughter Brahma got two
grandsons and two grand-daughters."
( Kovoor, p.76 )

The legend is given in the following `sacred' Vedic texts ( Spellman, p.28 ):

Aitareya Brahmana.III.33
Satapatha Brahmana.I.7.4.1ff; XIV, 4.2.1ff;
Matsya Purana.III.32 ff;
Bhagavata Purana.III.12.28ff.

Justification of Incest
In all these `holy' scriptures, this act of unrestrained incest is justified
and upheld as a legal act !

" Brahma followed Savitri [ Sarasvati ], married her, and they lived together
in a lotus for one hundred years. The Purana [ Matsya ] then points out that no
question arises regarding prohibited acts of the gods since they do not reap
the fruits of their karma (actions) as do mortals. A further justification of
Brahma's action is given by noting that Brahma is the lord of the Vedas and
Savitri is the goddess of the Vedas. They therefore are
inseparable, and to unite the Vedas with the sacred prayer can surely be no
evil."
( Spellman, p.30 )
However, the Vedas, which carry far more authority than the Puranic and
Brahmanic texts cited above, enjoin this practice. Incest, far from being a
`corruption' introduced after the Vedic Dark Ages, was thus a common practice
during that age of barbarism and illiteracy, and is a Hindu institution
perfectly sanctioned in the Vedas.

Vedic Sanction of Incest
One of the most irrefutable facts proving that Hinduism is evil right at its
very foundation is the fact that the Vedas justify the beastly act of incest as
a `sacred act'. This was no doubt an outcome of the strict practice of
`brahmacharya' which produced hoards of sexually starved psychopathic sadhus.
It is these mad sadhu Brahmins, the authors of the concocted Vedas, who
justified and legalised incast. Indeed, the Vedas enjoin incest as a kind of
marriage. This fact was utilised by Brahma when convincing his daughter
Sarasvati (also known as Padma) to succumb to his unlimited lust :

" 8. On seeing his beautiful daughter Padma, Brahma was sexually excited. He
wooed his daughter and wanted to copulate with her. How could a daughter give
consent to her own father? Padma refused. Brahma could not give up his desire.
He began to quote the Vedas to convince her that there was nothing wrong in
having sex with anyone, anytime, anywhere for the sake of giving birth to a
child. "
-- ( Puran )
This is the Vedic verse in Sanskrit which justifies incest and which was quoted
by Brahma :
“Mathara Mupathya, susara Mupatithe, Puthrartheetha.
Sagamarthi, Napathra loka, nasthee thath.
Saravam paravo vindu ha, dasmath Puthrar tham.
Matharam suransathee Rehathee”
- ( Veda, cited in Puran )
Tranlated this verse means
" For the sake of a child one can enjoy his own sister or daughter, without any
sin attached to it. "
( Puran )
There are other abundant examples of incest from the Vedic age. These prove
that the Vedic Aryans regularly practiced incest of the father-daughter type
and the brother-sister type ( Sita ). Moreover, the Vedas fully legalise this
abominable practice. These evil practices continued right throughout the
Brahmanic Dark Ages of 2599 years (1500 BC - 1000 AD). Thus, for example, Rama
maried his sister Sita when she was still only 6 years old ( Sitaram ).

#In ancient Jain Ramayana ,There is also a narration about Sita's brother Bhamandala. Bhamandala was sexually attracted to his own sister Sita and wanted to marry her.




Brahma's Bestiality with a Bear :
Brahma, the main god of the Vedic religion, was so lecherous that he was not
satisfied with his own daughter. In fact, feelings of lust crept up when he saw
even females of animal species ! He was so frustrated that he copulated with a
bear :
" 11. Brahma started roaming about in forests. He happened to see a female bear
in a bush. Brahma would not leave it. He went straight to the bear. The female
bear yielded to Brahma’s lust. God Brahma enjoyed the bear, and a human being
with the head of a bear was born. He was called Jambu Vandan, the son of
Brahma.
( Puran )
Other examples of beastiality abound. The Vedic Ashvamedha involved the Chief
Hindu Aryan Queen copulating with a dead horse ! Rama's mother herself
copulated with a dead horse during the asvamedha ceremony of King Dasaratha,
after which she was handed over to the disciples of the officiating Brahmin,
one of whom fathered Ram. Thus, Rama was illegitimate ( Mother ) ( Ram ).

Brahma is a God whose one head tells lies:

“Brahma desired Sarasvati and went to her, asking her to stay with him. She, being his daughter, was furious at this and said, ‘Your mouth speaks inauspiciously and so you will always speak in a contrary way.’ From that day, Brahma’s fifth head always spoke evilly and coarsely. Therefore one day when Siva was wandering about with Parvathi and came to see Brahma, Brahma’s four heads praised Siva but the fifth made an evil sound. Siva, displeased with the fifth head, cut it off. The skull remained stuck fast to Siva’s hand, and though he was capable of burning it up, Siva wandered the earth with it for the sake of all people, until he came to Benares.” — Siva Purana, Jnanasamhita 49:65-80.

How can Hindus knowingly worship gods (not humans) telling lies and committing rape of their own little daughters and incest???


this is from the religion of perverts sex maniacs who created kamasutra, what else do you expect.


# Their are extremely disgusting and obscene barbaric rituals in Hinduism which are signs of a very uncivilized Aryan Hindu society. Hindus worship their God Shiva's Half cut Penis called ‘Shiv Ling’ along with ‘Yoni’ which means Hairless Vagina in SANSKRIT.

# Hindu holy book Manusmriti says that ancient Hindu Gurus,Sadhus and Men were so pervert that they used to get horny by looking at their own mothers and sisters, here's proof from Manusmriti:

“Matra swastra ………..” – 2/215.  "people should avoid sitting alone with one’s mother, daughter or sister Since sexual/carnal desire is always strong, it can lead to temptation." Hahaha uncontrollable perverts that are Hindus and their God's and rishi's.


# Hinduism has a branch called tantricism which says the Hindu Gods, both male and female Gods, used to savagely drink blood mixed with sperm/semen. Male God's performing the uncivilized act of drinking blood and semen together also points towards Homosexuality and Gayness of such God's.


“The body of every living creature is made of semen
and blood. The Gods [deities] who are fond of sexual pleasure drink semen and blood.”

White Kiss of the Yogini, page:72.

Page Number 278, Hindus an alternative History by Wendy Doniger



# “Hindu Goddess Durga in ancient paintings and sculptures/statues is depicted with her tongue sticking out which is due to her depiction in Hindu holy mythological scriptures  story of her extending her tongue to lick up each
drop of the sperm/semen along with blood of Men such as a mythological character ‘Raktabija’s’ sperm and blood before it can fall to the ground.”

Padma Purana 1.46.1-32, 47-108, 119-21; Skanda Purana 1.2.27-29 (Doniger
O’Flaherty, Hindu Myths, 251-61); Matsya Purana 154-57.

“The long tongue of the goddess Kali,
like that of the female antigod Long Tongue, the bitch that licks up the oblations, is the upward
displacement of her excessive vaginas, a grotesque nightmare image of the devouring sexual
woman, her mouth a second sexual organ.

“Drinking
blood and sperm/semen mixed together is a very Hindu Tantric thing to do. In one of the Puranic antecedents of the Hindu
Tantras, “Glorification of the Goddess,” the goddess Chandika came up against an antigod that
was actually named Blood Semen/Sperm (Raktabija), from every drop of whose blood and semen/sperm a new antigod appeared. To conquer him, Chandika created the goddess Kali and
instructed her to open wide her mouth and drink the blood as well as the constantly appearing
progeny of Blood Sperm/Semen; then Chandika killed him. The goddess Kali effectively aborts the birth
of offspring of Blood Seed/Sperm/Semen  by prophylactically swallowing his sperm/semen/seed simultaneously along with the drops of his blood.

In other Puranas, the goddess Kali emits multiforms of herself who extend their tongues to lick up each
drop of the sperm/semen-blood before it can fall to the ground.”

-Padma Purana 1.46.1-32, 47-108, 119-21; Skanda Purana 1.2.27-29 (Doniger
O’Flaherty, Hindu Myths, 251-61); Matsya Purana 154-57.

-Page Number 278, Hindus an alternative History by Wendy Doniger


“The long tongue of the goddess Kali,
like that of the female antigod Long Tongue, the bitch that licks up the oblations, is the upward
displacement of her excessive vaginas, a grotesque nightmare image of the devouring sexual
woman, her mouth a second sexual organ.
But it is not semen-blood but female blood (together with male semen rather than male
blood) that plays the central role in the  Hinduism Tantras. The menstrual blood of the female participant is
connected to the polluting but life-giving blood of the menstruating goddess, which flows to the
earth each year, and the blood of her animal victims, decapitated and offered in sacrifice.”

-Page Number 278, Hindus an alternative History by Wendy Doniger


# Drinking and Licking Semen/Sperm along with menstrual blood was very common among ancient Hindus and their deities/Gods, read the proof from ancient Hindu Holy books below:

“Not just the goddess Kali, but also the Yoginis, a horde of ravishingly beautiful, terrifying, and powerful
female deities, participated in the drinking of the sexual fluids such as semen/sperm and menstrual blood. These Yoginis were often
placated with blood offerings and animal sacrifices but also propitiated by exchanging sexual
fluids such as semen/sperm along with menstrual blood with the male practitioners and by consuming those fluids (as well as other prohibited
foods).

White, Kiss of the Yogini,

Page Number 278, Hindus an alternative History by Wendy Doniger


# When a well educated scientists and British official came to India and studied its culture and behavior he wrote in a letter/diary dated October 2,

: “ The Hindoo/Hindu appears a being limited to mere animal functions, and even in them indifferent, with no higher intellect than a dog.”

Marquis of Hastings


British instead preferred Mughals,Turks,Persians and Arabs to Hindus (Hindus here meant ethnicity of everyone living in Hindustan prior to Middle Eastern and Central Asian Invasions and wasn't used for referring to the conglomerated name of various faiths followed in Indian Subcontinent )

“Despite their assimilation to a Hindu class, the British tended to prefer the company of
Muslims to Hindus for a number of reasons: Muslims were, like them, the rulers of India; they
were better horsemen than the Hindus; Islam was a monotheism that revered the Hebrew Bible
and the Christian New Testament; and it was quite easy to convert to Islam, much easier than to
convert to Hinduism.”

Page No. 374 Hinduism an alternative History.


# There is an ancient Hindu ritual of raping dead horse called Ashvamedha Yajna which was widespread and followed by  every Hindu in ancient and medieval times, especially by Hindu kings. Here's proof from Hindu Holy books :

Harivamsa Purana, Bhavishya Parva 3.5.11-13 ”After the passage of some time, king Janamejaya, who offers plenty of tributes (in sacrifices) observed the horse sacrifice as ordained. Devi Vapushtama, the daughter of the king of Kashi, went and had sex with/ slept/copulated with the slain (dead) horse, according to the ritual as prescribed. Seeing the queen with beautiful limbs, Vsava (Indra) desired her. Entering the body of the dead horse, Indra had intercourse withsc the queen.” Tr. A. Purushothaman and A. Harindranath. [ http://mahabharata-resources.org/harivamsa/bhavishyaparva/hv_3_005.html ]Ashwamedha yagna of Yudhisthira
The Ashvamedha (Sanskrit: अश्वमेध aśvamedhá) is a ritual of horse sacrifice and having sex with the dead horse followed by the Śrauta tradition of Vedic religion.

The horse to be sacrificed must be a stallion. The horse is sprinkled with water, and the Adhvaryu, the priest and the sacrificer whisper mantras into its ear. The horse is then set loose towards the North-East, to roam around wherever it chooses, for the period of one year (or half a year, according to some commentators). The horse is associated with the Sun, and its yearly course.[4] If the horse wanders into neighbouring provinces hostile to the sacrificer, they must be subjugated. The wandering horse is attended by a hundred young men, sons of princes or high court officials, charged with guarding the horse from all dangers and inconvenience. During the absence of the horse, an uninterrupted series of ceremonies is performed in the sacrificer's home.

After the return of the horse, more ceremonies are performed. The horse is yoked to a gilded chariot, together with three other horses, and Rigveda (RV) 1.6.1,2 (YajurVeda (YV) VSM 23.5,6) is recited. The horse is then driven into water and bathed. After this, it is anointed with ghee by the chief queen and two other royal consorts. The chief queen anoints the fore-quarters, and the others the barrel and the hind-quarters. They also embellish the horse's head, neck, and tail with golden ornaments. The sacrificer offers the horse the remains of the night's oblation of grain.

After this, the horse, a hornless he-goat, a wild ox (go-mrga, Bos gaurus) are bound to sacrificial stakes near the fire, and seventeen other animals are attached to the horse. A great number of animals, both tame and wild, are tied to other stakes, according to a commentator, 609 in total.[5]

The chief queen ritually calls on the king's fellow wives for pity. The queens walk around the dead horse reciting mantras. The chief queen (prepubscent and underage Queen) then has to spend a night copulating and having sex with the dead horse.
The Laws of Manu refer to the Ashvamedha (V.53): "The man who offers ritual of Ashvamedha Yajna every day for a hundred years,  reap the same fruit of good deeds."


Sanskrit epics and Puranas mention numerous legendary performances of the Ashvamedha Yajna ritual of sex with dead horse and horse sacrifice.For example, according to the Mahabharata, Emperor Bharata performed a hundred Ashvamedha Yajna Horse sacrifice and dead horse sex ceremonies on the banks of Yamuna, three hundred on the banks of Saraswati and four hundred on the banks of the Ganga. He again performed a thousand Ashvamedha on different locations and a hundred Rajasuya.
The historical performers of Ashvamedha include:

Monarch    Reign    Dynasty    Source
Pushyamitra Shunga    185-149 BCE    Shunga    Ayodhya inscription of Dhanadeva and Malavikagnimitra of Kalidasa[17]
Sarvatata    1st century BCE    Gajayana    Ghosundi and Hathibada inscriptions.[17] Some scholars believe Sarvatata to be a Kanva king, but there is no definitive evidence for this.[18]
Devimitra    1st century BCE    Unknown    Musanagar inscription[17]
Satakarni I    1st or 2nd century CE    Satavahana    Nanaghat inscription mentions his second Ashvamedha[19][17]
Vasishthiputra Chamtamula    c. 227-250 CE    Andhra Ikshvaku    Records of his son and grandson[20]
Shilavarman    3rd century CE    Varshaganya    Jagatpur inscriptions mention his fourth Ashvamedha[17]
Pravarasena I    c. 270 – c. 330 CE    Vakataka    Inscriptions of his descendants state that he performed four Ashvamedha sacrifices[21]
Bhavanaga    305-320 CE    Nagas of Padmavati    The inscriptions of Vakataka relatives of the Nagas credit them with 10 horse-sacrifices, although they do not name these kings.[17][20]
Vijaya-devavarman    300-350 CE    Shalankayana    Ellore inscription[21][22]
Shivaskanda Varman    4th century CE    Pallava    Hirahadagalli inscription[21]
Kumaravishnu    4th century CE    Pallava    Omgodu inscription of his great-grandson[21]
Samudragupta    c. 335/350-375 CE    Gupta    Coins of the king and records of his descendants[21][23]
Kumaragupta I    414 – 455 CE    Gupta    [24]
Madhava Varman    440-460 CE    Vishnukundina    [20]
Dharasena    5th century CE    Traikutaka    [22]
Krishnavarman    5th century CE    Kadamba    [22]
Narayanavarman    494–518 CE    Varman    Legend of Bhaskaravarman's seals[25]
Bhutivarman    518–542 CE    Varman    Barganga inscription[25]
Pulakeshin I    543–566 CE    Chalukyas of Vatapi    [26]
Sthitavarman    565–585 CE    Varman    [27]
Pulakeshin II    610–642 CE    Chalukyas of Vatapi    .
Madhavaraja II (alias Madhavavarman or Sainyabhita)    c. 620-670 CE    Shailodbhava    Inscriptions.
Simhavarman (possibly Narasimhavarman I)    630-668 CE    Pallava The Sivanvayal pillar inscription states that the Hindu King Performed more than ten AshvamedhasYajna rituals of Sex with dead horse.

The Dhanadeva-Ayodhya inscription, 1st century BCE, mentions two Ashvamedha Yajna Dead Horse sex (necrophilia) rituals by A Hindu Pushyamitra in the city of Ayodhya.

The earliest recorded criticism of the ritual comes from the Cārvāka, an atheistic school of Indian philosophy that assumed various forms of philosophical skepticism and religious indifference. A quotation of the Cārvāka from Madhavacharya's Sarva-Darsana-Sangraha states: "The three authors of the Vedas were buffoons, knaves, and demons. All the well-known formulae of the pandits, jarphari, turphari, etc. and all the obscene rites for the queen commanded in Aswamedha, these were invented by buffoons, and so all the various kinds of presents to the priests, while the eating of flesh was similarly commanded by night-prowling demons."
-Madhavacarya, Sarvadarsana-sangraha, English translation by E. B. Cowell and A. E. Gough, 1904 quoted in Debiprasad Chattopadhyaya (ed.), Carvaka/Lokayata: An Anthology of Source Materials and Some Recent Studies (New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 1990)


“The utterly  barbaric and obscene Hindu ritual  called 'Ashvamedha Yajna’ where a underage Hindu girl is gang raped by tens of Brahmins as part of the ritual and then the little girl is forced to have sex with a Dead horse, this part of the ritual offended the Dalit reformer and framer of the Indian constitution B. R. Ambedkar and is frequently mentioned in his writings as an example of the perceived degradation of Brahmanical culture.”

-Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, Writings and Speeches. p. 1376.


# The Udayendiram inscription of the 8th century Pallava king Nandivarman II (alias Pallavamalla) states that his general Udayachandra defeated the Nishada ruler Prithvivyaghra, who performed the Ritual of Ashvamedha Yajna where it is required to have sex with dead horse and the underage prepubscent Queen is forced to be gang raped by tens of Brahmins consecutively while other Queens of the Hindu Kings shout mantras full of obscenities which are too vulgar to mention , "desiring to become very powerful, was running after the horse of the Ashvamedha".


# Drugging:

Hindu God Shiva was a Druggard Charsi and used to remain stoned on cannabis and commit adultery and insane acts like raping rishi's wives and dead bodies like aghoris which also resulted in cutting of Shiva's penis by Rishi's which formed Shiv ling worshipped by Hindus, Cannabis is still used in all Hindu Holy festivals and mixed in their sweets in Deepawali and Holi cannabis/bhaang and charas is mixed in sweets by Hindus.


# Hindu Niyog Ritual also known as wife sharing or ancient Hindu ritual of gang bang of single girl by multiple Hindu men:

In Mahabharata The 5 pandava brothers were plain bastards
Kunti, their mother, was gang raped by Indra, Vayu, Yam, Surya, etc. etc.
says scholarly indian hindu, read below
The movie anahat implies that pandavas were born using the 'niyog' or wife sharing Hindu ritual
procedure because their legal father was possibly impotent.
It is indeed true, As per mahabharat Pandu was cursed by to die as
soon
as he has intercourse with his wives by a rishi.Kunti followed Niyog
procedure to produce children with Indra ( Arjun) , Vayu ( Bheem) ,Yam
( Yudhuishtir), Surya ( Karna) and Madri with Agni for Nakul and
Sahdev. In fact Pandu, Dhritrashrtra and Vidur were also born by
Niyog with Rishi Durvasa. So the 5 Pandavas were illegitimate sons and bastards.

#  In ancient Hindu traditions daughters in their prepubescent ages (3 to 12 years old) were sold as sex slaves in open market to the highest bidder, the bidders were often in their 40s,50s,60s and even older men.

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2018/mar/07/india-girls-women-trafficked-brides-sexual-domestic-slavery


#In the oldest Valmiki Ramayana it is stated that Hindu God Hanuman indirectly raped a animal that is a crocodile. After returning from Lanka Hanuman was sexually excited, at that time Hanuman was flying above a pond, Hanuman began Masturbating and his sperm fell in the pond which was swallowed by the Crocodile which gave birth to Hanuman son with a Crocodile.What a pervert god Hanuman was guilty of bestiality.


# Hindu holy books are banned in many foreign countries due to obscenity and violence in them, One of such country is Russia which banned Hindu holy book called ‘Bhagwat Gita’, a  commendable right action on part of Russian to ban such a Obscene book, It should be used as toilet paper or for cleaning Dogs shit/poop.


# As per recorded history Prior to Middle Eastern Muslim Invasions of India, Most of Hindus used to remain Stark nude as is still observed in Sadhus at Kumbh Mela and Aghoris and remote rural Dehati Areas , Only upper caste Hindus used to wear Garments and lower caste was not permitted to wear clothes and the merciless Brahmins laid a heavy tax for even lower caste under age girls to cover their Breasts in public called 'Nangeli’. The Upper caste Brahmins wore only a dhoti and no upper garment and few upper castes only wore langot, Sherwani , Salwar -Kameez and Kurta was introduced to North India by Turks ,Persians and Mughals.Otherwise Hindus were referred to as 'Dhotichaap’ by the Middle Eastern Muslim Invaders. Muslim Invasion freed lower caste Hindus from unfair caste based disparities.


# Yet another one of plethora of Obscene Hindu rituals is Eloji worship where little girls are forced to worship Huge penis of the Pervert Hindu god Eloji.


https://www.newsflare.com/video/189888/entertainment-arts/devotees-take-giant-phallus-in-procession-in-india


#The reason for Hindu ritual of inviting Hijras or Homosexuals/Gays in Hindu traditional marriages explained:
‘LGBTI persons will delight in the crossdressing pastimes of Subala Milana.’
In ancient Hindu mythology, Subala, who is male, dresses in female attire. He swaps clothes with Radharani, a milkmaid and the lover of the god Krishna. Radharani meanwhile dresses in Subala’s male attire. Their likeness is so similar that they could not be told apart.

Wilhelm added: ‘In Vrndavana, India, temples still dress Radharani in male attire on this day and it is one of the rare opportunities to view Her lotus feet and receive special blessings.’

There is also the story of Shikhandi, featured in the sacred Mahābhārata. This is one of the two major epics of ancient India, written in the Sanskrit language.

Shikhandi was born a woman (with the name Shikhandini) but was raised as a man. He was then arranged to marry a woman.

But when she found out he was actually a girl, she insulted him and he fled. He then met a yaksha (spirit) who agreed to exchange his gender.

Shikhandini then returned as a man with the name ‘Shikhandi’ and led a happy married life with his wife and children.

There are also many androgynous and intersex themes in Hindu mythology.

Gods sometimes changed sex and non-divine beings underwent sex-changes through the actions of the gods. This could’ve been as a result of curses or blessings, or as the natural outcome of reincarnation.

Modern day Hindu Hijra(हिजड़ा) people still blur gender.

Hijra are still blurring gender lines in India today. If you were to translate the word hijra into English, you may call them transgender. But actually, it’s a far more complicated social and cultural identity than just that.

While they are shunned in some circumstances, they are also important to Indian cultural life. No Hindu wedding is blessed if hijra don’t attend it. And increasingly they are getting protection and are starting to get access to better jobs.

Hijras are officially recognized as third gender by some governments in Southeast Asia. They can be transgender, intersex or eunuchs.

# Homosexuality in Ancient Hindu Lands was a common thing among Hindu God's, Hindu Kings and Local Hindu populace.
Ancient Hindu societies considered homosexuality as a common act. In fact, a ancient archaeological evidence from India that is a medical text dating back to 600BC mentions two different types of homosexual men. Kumbhika are ‘men who take the passive role’ in anal sex; and asekya are ‘men who devour the semen of other men’.

It also states men who behave like women, or women who behave like men, are determined at conception in the womb.

And it states if two women have sex and one becomes pregnant, the child will be born without bones. This is because they believed a father provides bones and mothers provide flesh and blood.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.gaystarnews.com/article/this-is-how-hinduism-lgbti-people-are-celebrating-diwali-this-year/amp/


# There is Ancient barbaric ritual of Hindu Boys and men raping dead bodies of little girls , that is necrophilia+pedophilia, which still followed by Aghori Sadhus. Hindus and Aghori Sadhus (A sect of Hinduism) have sex with menstruating women and drink the menstruation blood of women and are extremely disgusting. Such Hindu rituals were banned under British Rule, Turkish,Persian and Mughal rule in India, but few Hindu Aghori Sadhus still follow it.

https://edtimes.in/cannibalism-cannabis-sex-with-corpses-nudity-read-about-the-aghori-sadhus-of-varanasi/

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2Fwvu7RokOg


# Idiotic and illiterate Indians:

The word ‘Babu’ used in everyday vocabulary by Hindus is probably derived from "baboons" which is a derogatory term for ‘monkeys’.

During the British rule in India, the Indians serving them often used to imitate their English superiors,

for which the English people mocked them as baboons (monkeys: as monkeys are known for imitating).


The Indian servants felt it an honourable term and the word got slowly changed to babu, very much similiar to the 'babu' in gov. Offices.


                            INCEST IN HINDUISM ( Sex with ones biological mother, daughter,sons,sister, brother, father)


References to incest abound even in the Rig Veda, showing that the perversion of brother-sister incest was introduced by the Hindu-Aryan savages who invaded India :

#`Lord' Krishna lived in incest with his sister Subhadra, sharing her with his brother Balarama Mah.wh.153 . "In the festivals of that God Jagannath , the 3 images of Krishna, his brother Balarama, and his sister Subhadra, are brought prominently forward; and the populace do not fail to heap reproaches upon Krishna, and upon his sister likewise, for having indulged in a criminal intimacy" Mah.wh 153 . Again, " In the older tradition, Subhadra Krishna's sister is said to have lived in criminal intimacy with both her brothers. This tradition is universally known and believed by the people in spite of the story of the marriage of Subhadra to Arjun ; and the Mussalmans frequently taunt the Hindus with the fact. The Pundits reconcile the stories by a fiction of there having been two Subhadras. As to Krishna's proceedings, they are expalined away as Maya, or delusion." -- Mah.wh.153 b.. The Vedic Pushan is the lover of his sister Rg Ved VI.55.4 Apte 11 . No wonder so many Hindus have intercourse with their sisters ! c.. The Aryan God Agni is the lover of his own sister Rg Ved X.3.3 Apte 11 . A true model for all Aryans ! d.. Ashvins are referred to as the sons of Savitar and Ushas who are brother and sister Apte 11 . No doubt many pious Arya Hindus are the offspring of siblings. e.. The Ashvisns married Surya and Savitri who is their sister RV I.116.19 . f.. Agni is the son of his father and his sister Rg Ved.I.91.7 g.. Yama wards off his sister Yami, saying marriage between brother and sister is forbidden Rg.V.X.10 Apte 11 . This is the first indication that the Aryans had at least some moral sense ! However, this verse is evidently a later interpolation. Father-daughter incest occurs in the famous story of Prajapati (later identified with Brahma, in turn incorporated as an incarnation of Vishnu) and his daughter RV III.31.1-2 .

It is evident that the strict laws on male-female relations led to the repression of normal practies and played a role in the rise of various perversions like brother-sister incest, father-daughter incest etc. Strict ascetism always leads to the rise of perversions. Even to this day incest of varying degrees (cross-cousin, father-daughter, mother-son, brother-sister, etc.) is extremely common amongst the Indo-Aryans. No other race on earth has ever recorded such a prevalance of this practice. Just as sodomy has its home in Persia, Lesbianism in ancient Lesbos, so incest has its home amongst the Indo-Aryans.


#Repressed sexuality has also been a factor in what in the West might be considered widespread incest. In India's Hindu religion, sex between brothers-in-law and sisters-in-law for e.g., or between cousins; or uncles and nieces; or aunts and nephews are common, although hard statistics are not available. As per the Manu Dharma Sastram (applicable to the Treta Yuga and Dwapara Yuga), if a lady is widowed without having any sons; then she could have a son through her dead husband's brother. So, when Vichitravirya died without any sons, his mother Satyavati approached Vichitravirya's half-brothers to co-habit with Ambalika and Ambika to bless them with a son each. Bhishma, Santanu's son, refused on account of his vow of brahmacharya. Then she asked her own son Veda Vyasa for sexual intercourse in order to have a child with him and he obliged. It is very clear that in this case Ambika and Ambalika were obedient but unhappy to go through this process. It was also legal for a man to approach a brahman or a deva to give him a son through his wife.


# Hindu tradition of Devdasi also known as Temple prostitution:

Underage lower caste Girls usually between 3 to 8 years old are forced to become sexual slaves and  to perform Kamasutra dances at the local Temple for the Higher caste Brahmins. Such little girls also experience forced labour and their internal organs are destroyed due to premature sex with way older Brahmin Pundits.


Prominent personality Abbe J.A. Dubois wrote about Hinduism obscene ritual of using pre pubscent little girls (usually 3 to 8 years old) as Temple prostitutes and temple sex slaves for Pedophile Pundits, Brahmins and higher castes.

"Once the devadasis (Devdasis are Temple prostitutes or sex slaves to cater to Pundits who were all pedophiles) temple duties are over, they open their cells of infamy, and frequently convert the temple itself into a stew. A religion more shameful or indecent has never existed amongst a civilized people."

-http://www.hinduismtoday.com/archives/1993/9/1993-9-12.shtml


#Jogini:


# The word Hindu itself is of Persio-Arabic origin, a middle eastern (Arab/Persian) word for people residing besides the rivers in Sindh.

“The term Hindī originally was used by the Persians to refer to inhabitants of the region east of the Indus. It was borrowed from Classical Persian Hindī (Iranian Persian Hindi), meaning "Indian", from the proper noun Hind "India".”

-Steingass, Francis Joseph (1892). A comprehensive Persian-English dictionary. London: Routledge & K. Paul. p. 1514.

(http://dsalsrv02.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/philologic/getobject.pl?c.7:1:6823.steingass)


Hindu is a geographical term used by persians for land on other side of Sindhu river. All religions which arose in this geographical region were erroneously called Hindu by the Mughals first, and later by the British.

The British were the first to use Hinduism for a religion, when Smarthas with British wanted Manusmriti laws to rule India under Anglo-Hindu Law.


“The name Hindavī was used by Amir Khusrow in his poetry.”

-Khan, Rajak. "Indo-Persian Literature and Amir Khusro". University of Delhi

(http://vle.du.ac.in/mod/book/print.php?id=11660)


The meaning of the word Hindu in ancient Persian dictionary depicts that Hindus were considered inferior,Illiterates, barbaric and subhumane by the Persians. (Hindus to be distinguished with Dalits and Dravidians the real natives of India).

“It is correct that the name “Hindu” has been given to the original Indian race of the region by Muslim invaders to humiliate them. In Arabic and Persian the word “Hindu” means “Black Slave” and/or “Black Thief” & "Black Dog”. The Indian subcontinent is inhabited by dark/black complexioned people of the Australoid Race. The Aryans (fair/white skinned) took the native Hindus as slaves and sold them all over the world. The original Indians are of the Australoid race and are dark/black skinned. The Aryans are the modern day Iran (Land of the Aryans) of today (Persians).”

-Maharishi Shri Dayanand Sarswati Aur Unka Kaam, edited by Lala Lajpat Rai, published from Lahore in 1898.

“Had they [ the Persians and the British ] not given us the name ” Hindu ” we could have divided ourselves into various religion – like Saivites, Vaishnavites, Sakthas, Muruga Bhakts and as devotees of Ellai Amma – in every town . Is there a common God for Saivites and Vaishnavites? No, Siva is not the God of Vaishnavites; the militant Saivites say that Vishnu is not a God at all, but only a devotee of Lord Shiva. Can anyone consider these two as belonging to a single religion? The Mughals and the British gave a common name – HINDU, and we are saved. The name that they christened saved us.”

– Sri Chandrasekarendra Saraswathi, Kanchi Paramacharya, Voice of God Volume 1, Page: 266. [Tamil Edn]


Prior to Muslim Invaders and Britishers merging all Indian Subcontinent religions as a conglomeration under one head called Hinduism,  India had different religions ,Shaivites were the followers of Kapalan/Aghori god Shiva, then we had Vaishnavites the followers of Hindu God Vishnu and so on for the 330 million Hindu God's, then we had Aryan Vedic religion or Brahminism and we had Jainism and Buddhism all of these religions had conflicts with each other and through out the past had fought each other for superiority.


“The political situation of our country( Indian Subcontinent) from centuries past, say 20-
25 centuries has made it very difficult to understand the nature of
this nation and its religion. The western scholars, and historians,
too, have failed to trace the true name of this Brahmanland, a vast
continent like country, and therefore, they have contended
themselves by calling it by that meaningless term “Hindu.” This
word, which is a foreign innovation, is not made use by any of our
Sanskrit writers and revered Acharyas in their works. It seems that
political power was responsible for insisting upon continuous use of
the word Hindu. The word Hindu is found, of course, in Persian
literature. Hindu-e-falak means “the black of the sky’ and Saturn.”
In the Arabic language Hind not Hindu means nation. It is shameful
and ridiculous to have read all along in history that the name Hindu
was given by the Persians to the people of our country when they
landed on the sacred soil of Sindhu.”

-[R. N. Suryanarayan, Universal
Religion, p 1-2, published from Mysore in 1952.]


“ it is correct that this name 'Hindu’ has been given to the original Aryan race of
the region by Muslim invaders to humiliate them. In Persian, says
our author, the word means slave, and according to Islam, all those
who did not embrace Islam were termed as slaves.”

- [Maharishi Shri
Dayanand Sarswati Aur Unka Kaam, edited by Lala Lajpat Rai,
published from Lahore in 1898, in the chapter of introduction.]

Besides, a ancient Persian dictionary titled Lughet-e-Kishwari, republished in
Lucknow in 1964, gives the meaning of Hindu as ‘chore (thief), dakoo
(dacoit), raahzan (waylayer), and ghulam (slave)’. Yet according to
an other dictionary named Urdu-Feroze-ul-Laghat – part 1 (page 615),
the meaning of the word Hindu is as under: In Turkish: chore,
raahzan and lutera (looter). In Persian: ghulam (slave), barda
(obedient servant), sia faam (black color) and kaalaa (black). The
hypothesis that Persians had difficulty in pronouncing Sindhu is
baseless and preposterous. For example, how do the Persians who are
Shia Muslims pronounce words like Shia, Sunni and Shariat? In
Punjabi there are many, many words of Persian origin, which start
with “s” and “sh.” For example, sardar or sirdar (leader), shaheed
(martyr), shhadat (martyrdom) shair (lion), sahir (town), sar (walk)
shayer (poet), shakar (sugar), sja (punishment), siahi (black ink),
siah(black) and so on. The word Punjab is also derived from Persian
panj and aab (five waters).


“ To find the meaning of “Hindu” one ought to look at the term “Hindu
Kush”(killer of Hindus). Who were the people, who named this
mountain range as Hindu Kush? Why these mountains were called the
killers of Hindus? As I mentioned earlier, the Indian subcontinent
was inhabited by dark complexioned people before the migration of
Caucasian tribes from the Caucasus region. The fair skinned
Caucasian tribes who lived on the Northwest of Hindu Kush Mountain
range called the Indian subcontinent as the land of Hindus (land of
black people). The Northwest expansion of the inhabitants of Indus
Valley was prevented by of Hindu Kush Mountains. Whenever the plain
dwelling Indians (Hindus) attempted to cross these mountains, they
met death due harsh terrain and heavy snow. That is how these
mountains were given the name Hindu Kush by mountain dwelling
Caucasian tribes. Once a large number of Indian Hindu  slaves died on these
mountains due to heavy snow fall while being carried to their slave masters and that is how these mountains
acquired the name “Hindu Kush” – killer of the Hindus. “

-[Bhai Kahan
Singh Nabha, Mahan Kosh, 1996 edn. p 275.]

Later on when the Caucasian tribes conquered Northwest India, they
continued using the name Hindu for native Indians. To humiliate the
natives, the Caucasians ridiculed their culture, looks and black
complexion, and used derogatory expressions for them. It is
astonishing that these derogatory expressions have survived through
thousands of years of Indian history and are found in modern Indian
languages. “Blackness” is used in bad connotation in Indian
languages. For example, in Punjabi there are expressions like, kaala
munh (black mouth, ugly or who speaks ill), kaali Jeebh ( evil
speaking tounge), kaala chore (notorious thief), kaala dhandha
(illegal profession), kaala dhan (black money), kaali bhaid (black
sheep), kalai laikh (black deeds) and kaala chum (black skinned
person). There are also expressions like bandar munhan (monkey face)
and rish jeha (bear-like), which the Caucasians used to describe the
features of native Indians (Hindus). In Ramyan, the two native
devotees of Shri Ramchandra are depicted as a monkey (Hanuman) and
a bear (Jamawant).

# White Skin Frenzy:

The Muslim conquers used the word Hindu for all the Indians.
However, Hindus, who supported the Muslim rulers in the
establishment of their authority over Hindu masses, were honored
with titles like Chaudhary, Malik, Dewan, Shah, Raizada, Rayees,
Munshi, Mahajan and others. Nowadays, the descendents of those
Hindus bear these titles with great pride as surnames. Shah did not
find the meaning of “Hindu” as black because he searched the wrong
sources. Moreover, even if Shah had found that “Hindu” means black,
he would have been hesitant to accept it, as the inferiority complex
of “blackness” is deeply imbedded in the psyche of Indians. Most
Indians except the Dalits consider themselves as the descendants of
Caucasian tribes, who ruled over India before the onslaught of
Muslims. So for Hindus to accept that “Hindu” means black would make
them the descendants of native Indians, who are black people That is
why Hindus insist that “Hindu” is the corrupted form of Sindhu.
Indians of today are the products of thousands of years of
miscegenation between Caucasian groups and native Indians. However,
Indians are reluctant to admit this fact. Excluding Kashmiris, the
complexion of the Indian population varies from ‘light tan’
to ‘ebony black’ and the majority is quite dark. Indians despise
black skin color is in spite of the fact that Indians are considered
non-white by Europeans. For instance, in Indian movies, invariably,
the hero and heroine have Caucasian features and lighter skin color
than most of the population. Moreover, in the matrimonial columns in
Indian newspapers everyone looks for a spouse of lighter color. Why
does a dark person want to marry a person of lighter color? Is it
because the dark person is not comfortable with his or her color and
want to improve the color of his or her progeny. The superiority of
white skin is deeply imbedded in the Indian psyche because ever
since the conquest of Indus Valley by Caucasians, India has been
ruled by white people like Aryans, Persians, Macedonians, Scythians,
Huns, Arabs, Turks, Afghanas, Mangols, Portugese, French and
English. When the English left, Indians crowned Jawahar Lal Nehru,
who was the fairest among the Hindu leaders. In the words of a
socialist leader, Madhu Limaye, Nehru practiced both racism and
casteism, despite his modern upbringing and outlook (Telegraph,
Calcutta, November 21, 1987). In a revealing passage about
his “making,” Nehru wrote, “Behind me lie somewhere in the sub-
conscience, racial memories of hundred or whatever the numbers may
be, generations of Brahmans. I cannot get rid of that past
inheritance.” [Jawaharlal Nehru, An Autobiography (1936)), 1980
edn., p 596.] Being a fair skinned Brahman he rode roughshod over
other leaders. The so-called iron man Patel or president Rajindra
Parsad did not dare to challenge Nehru over his policies. The reason
could be that both of them belonged to lower castes and had very
dark complexion. It is intriguing why Mahatma Gandhi, a Gujrati
Bania with caricature personality, insisted upon making Nehru his
heir apparent, while ignoring others who were equally qualified. Was
it Nehru’s fair skin, which impressed Gandhi the most? Similarly,
why couldn’t the Congress Party find a single person in the whole
country worthy enough to be its leader? It turned to Sonia Gandhi,
who like her late husband does not understand or speak Hindi very
well. What qualifications distinguish her from other Congress
leaders? Is it her fair skin? In Pashto, the language of the
dominant Afghan tribe of Pashtoons, Hindu is pronounced as Indu (h
is silent). The Greeks called the people of Indus Valley Indos or
Indus and hence, the name India. The Muslims called it Hindustan.
Bharat or Bhartvarsha may be the name of a mythical kingdom in Hindu
scriptures or of a small principality located in the state of Uttar
Pardesh but it was never the name of the Indian subcontinent.

Whereas Hinduism is derived from the word Hindu, the names of the
other three religions, Buddhism, Janism and Sikhism founded on the
Indian subcontinent are derived from Indian words with noble
meanings: “Budh” (enlightenment), “Jan”[victorious (over vices)]
and “Sikh”(learner), respectively.

Does it make any sense for Indians who are never tired of talking
about the glory of their past, their religion and their civilization
to call themselves “Hindus” when this word is not found in any Hindu
text? The foreigners gave this derogatory label “Hindu” to the
people of the Indian subcontinent. What right or justification do
the champions of “Hindutva” have to apply this derogatory
label “Hindu” to others, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists? Have Hindus no
sense of shame or decency? It’s no wonder that Sanskrit does not
have the equivalents of words like jameer (conscience), emaan (moral
conviction) and vfa
(fidelity).

India will remain mired in religious, caste, linguistic and ethnic
strifes as long as Indians don’t come to terms with their past
history objectively and learn from it.


                        RITUALS IN HINDUISM

# Dowry:

Priof from Hindu Holy Scriptures:

                           1. In Hindu Holy Books When Sita was married to Sri Ram, carts full of jewelry, Mohurs etc. were sent with her. Besides these thousands of horses, elephants and chariots were given to her. Hundreds of male and female slaves were also gifted.


HOMOSEXUALITY AND GAYS IN HINDUISM:


# Early Buddhist and Hindu periods covered in ancient texts such as Manusmriti, Arthasastra, and Kamasutra refer to same-sex attraction and behavior.

# The ancient Hindu homosexuality tradition, as indicated in the pillar caves of Karle (50-75 CE), shows two bare breasted women in sexual poses and embracing each other.

This shows that Homosexuality and gay acts were common among ancient Hindus.


# In Hindu holy scriptures, for example, Bhagiratha is born from the sexual union ,that is gay sex or homosexual act,of two women.

-Kalra G, Gupta S, Bhugra D. Sexual variation in India: A view from the west. Indian J Psychiatry. 2010;52:S264–8


# Dressing as a women and transgenderism was common among ancient Hindus, For example in Hindu Holu scriptures a man name Bapiya was a transgender and used to dress as a women.

“ To attain penance Bapiya worshipped Bahuchara Mata by dressing and behaving as a woman, thus ultimately shedding his masculinity.”


# In Hindu Holy Books Shikhandi in Mahabharata and Ardhanarishwar have also been described as Homosexuals and gays.

-Kalra G, Gupta S, Bhugra D. Sexual variation in India: A view from the west. Indian J Psychiatry. 2010;52:S264–8


#Hindu god Ayyappa is a gay/dual gendered god and is worshiped by hijras or transgender gays of India.

-Kalra G, Gupta S, Bhugra D. Sexual variation in India: A view from the west. Indian J Psychiatry. 2010;52:S264–8


# In many ancient Hindu temples such as Several sculptures and carvings in Khajuraho and Sun temple of Konarak depict gay/homosexual same-sex behavior including, mutual fellatio and orgiastic scenes.This proves Homosexuality and gay sex was common among ancient Hindus but the Homosexuality and gay acts were seen as taboo by Abrahamic religions , that is Islam, Christianity, Judaism. Hence in Abrahamic religions (Islam, Christianity, Judaism) Homosexuality and Gay acts are punishable by death.


# Ancient Hindu literature and Hindu holy books show that Lesbian actions and Lesbian sex was also common among Hindus and even their deities are seen performing Lesbian sex, Valmiki Ramayana suggests that SITA also had Lesbian action and was probably a Bisexual.

Here's proof :

Valmiki Ramayana Book II : Ayodhya Kanda - Book Of Ayodhya
Chapter [Sarga] 118

“tato anasuuyaa samhR^iShTaa shrutvaa uktam siitayaa vacaH |
shirasy aaghraaya ca uvaaca maithiliim harShayanty uta” || 2-118-13

13. tataH= then; shrutvaa= hearing; vachaH= the words; uktam= spoken; siitayaa= by Seetha; anasuuyaa= Anasuya; samhR^iSTaa= was very much pleased; aaghraaya= kissed ; shirasi= the head; maithiliim= of Seetha; uvaacha= and spoke; harSayantii= delightfully (as follows)
Translation:
“Hearing the words of Seetha, Anasuya was very much pleased, kissed Sita and spoke delightfully (as follows)”

Pedophilia in Hinduism (aka Child sexual Molestation by Older Men/Women)


It is compulsary according to Hindu holy books to have a Pedophilia Marriage whereby old Men should marry and sexually molest little pre pubscent girls.

Almost all ancient Hindu marriages were pedophiliac.


# Hindu God RAM was a 30 year old pedophile who married soon to be 6 year old Sita here is another proof from hindu holy books :

Skanda Purana III.ii.30.8-9 “The bow of Isvara that was kept in the abode of Janaka, was broken. O king, Rama married the six year old beautiful daughter of the king of Mithila, Sita who was not born of a womb. On getting Sita, Raghava became contented and happy.”

# Sita was only 5 when she was married to the Pedophile Rama .Here is the proof with Sankrit verses…

Valmiki’s Ramayana Book III : Aranya Kanda

Here is the direct link – http://www.valmikiramayan.net/.../sar.../aranya_47_frame.htm


Chapter [Sarga] 47 Introduction: The debate of Seetha and Ravana has started, as Ravana wished to woo Seetha… “रावणेन तु वैदेही तदा पृष्टा जिहीर्षुणा | परिव्राजक रूपेण शशंस आत्मानम् आत्मना || ३-४७-१. (When Ravana whose intention is to abduct her has enquired thus, then on the basis of his Brahman friar’s mien Seetha informed about herself on her own”. [3-47-1]) दुहिता जनकस्य अहम् मैथिलस्य महात्मनः | सीता नाम्ना अस्मि भद्रम् ते रामस्य महिषी प्रिया || ३-४७-३ (I am the daughter of noble- souled Janaka, the king of Mithila, by name I am Seetha/Sita, and the dear wife and queen of Rama, let safety betide you. [3-47-3]) उषित्वा द्वा दश समाः इक्ष्वाकूणाम् निवेशने |भुंजाना मानुषान् भोगान् सर्व काम समृद्धिनी || ३-४७-४ ( On residing in the residence of Ikshvaku-s in Ayodhya for twelve years, I was in sumptuosity of all cherishes while relishing all humanly prosperities. [3-47-4] ) NOTE- SO AFTER THEIR MARRIAGE BOTH RAMA & SITA HAPPILY LIVED TOGETHER AS HUSBAND AND WIFE AT AYODHYA FOR FOR 12 YEARS. AND NOW… तत्र त्रयो दशे वर्षे राज अमंत्र्यत प्रभुः | अभिषेचयितुम् रामम् समेतो राज मन्त्रिभिः || ३-४७-५ (In the thirteenth year the lordly king Dasharatha deliberated together with his imperial ministers to apoint Rama as Crown Prince of Ayodhya. [3-47-5]). NOTE – SO IN 13th YEAR WHEN DASHARATHA WANTED TO APOINT RAMA AS CROWN PRINCE OF ADODHYA THE PROBLEM AROSE. And as per Sita herself… तस्मिन् संभ्रियमाणे तु राघवस्य अभिषेचने | कैकेयी नाम भर्तारम् मम आर्या याचते वरम् || ३-४७-६ ( When Raghava’s anointment was being organised my venerable mother-in-law known as Kaikeyi begged her husband Dasharatha for a boon.[3-47-6]) NOTE- AND ULTIMATLY RAMA & SITA ALONG WITH THEIR YOUNGER BROTHER LAXMANA WARE EXALTED TO FOREST AND AS PER SITA… मम भर्ता महातेजा वयसा पंच विंशकः || ३-४७-१० अष्टा दश हि वर्षाणि मम जन्मनि गण्यते | ( “To me eighteen years are reckoned up from my birth. [3-47-10 b,11a ]) HERE IT IS Very simple to determine the age of Sita at the time of her marriage. After marriage with Rama she lived with Rama at Adodhya for 12 years and on 13th year they exalted to forest and at that time she was 18 years.

So Sita was 18-13=5 years at the time of her marriage.



Violence in Hinduism

Scriptures and Holy Books:

# Hindu scriptures sanction Holocaust of lower castes (in history Hindus holocausted over 2 billion lower castes in thousands of years) also Kalki will kill kower caste shudras and lower caste kings and all those people born of mixed castes.


Brahmanda Purana 1.2.31.77-84 “In the previous Svayambhuva Manvantara, he had been born of a part of Madhava (Visnu). For a full period of twenty years, he wandered over the Earth taking with him an army along with horses, chariots and elephants. Surrounded by hundreds and thousands of Brahmanas wielding weapons, he killed all the Mlecchas all round along with those kings, the heretics born of Sudra women. The lord exterminates those heretics. "

Historical :

# "Following the Hindu Kings occupation of Samana in 1709, the Hindu army participated in a massacre of the city's residents. More than 100,000 unarmed Muslim men and women were slain as per records, more deaths went unrecorded.[55] Following the Siege of Sirhind, Banda Singh Bahadur ordered that all men, women and children be executed.[55] All residents of Sirhind, whether they were men, women or children were all burned alive or slain.[55] In December 1757, Hindu Kings pillaged the Doab and the city of Jullunder.[55] During this pillaging, "Millions of Children were put to the sword, women were dragged out , raped and forcibly converted to Hinduism" and Mosques were defiled by pigs blood."

- History of the Punjab: From the Remotest Antiquity to Present Time, pp. 111–21

# Violence against Buddhists :

record of the Nalanda Inscription of Vipulasrimitra, that a Vangala army killed millions of Buddhist monks one was reknowned famous peaceful monk called Karunasrimitra of Somapura and burnt down his house, which was actually a monastery. [Epigraphia Indica vol.21 Page 97]

Ancient Hindus were utterly barbaric and  raped,killed and conducted genocide of hundreds of millions of Buddhists, Jains  and Lower castes. Hindu holy books Buddhists atheists and call to Holocaust them, evidences :

A Chalukya Inscription of 1184 A.D. refers to a feudatory chief, Mahaamandaleshvara Viruparasadeva, who is described as a’forest-fire to the Jain religion’, a ‘destroyer of the Buddha religion’, a ‘demolisher of Jain basadis’ and ‘establisher of the Sivalinga-Simhaasana (Shiva Linga Throne).He destroyed several samayas at Pariyalige, Anilevada (Anhilwad), Unukallu (Unkal), Sampagadi (Sampagaon), Ibbaluru (Ablur?), Marudige (Maradigi), Anampur (Alampur), KaTahada (Karad), Kembhavi, Bammakuru and other places and took millions of their young girls as young as 5 year old as sex slaves (devdasis) for life time.

-[Annual report of the archaeological survey of India 1929-30 Page 171]

Animal Eating and Animal sacrifice in Hinduism


# In the time of the oldest Hindu sacred text, the Rig Veda (c. 1500 B.C.), cow meat was consumed. Like most cattle-breeding cultures, the Vedic Indians generally ate the castrated steers, but they would eat the female of the species during rituals or when welcoming a guest or a person of high status.

Ancient ritual texts known as Brahmanas (c. 900 B.C.) and other texts that taught religious duty (dharma), from the third century B.C., say that a bull or cow should be killed to be eaten when a guest arrives.

According to these texts, “the cow is food.” Even when one passage in the “Shatapatha Brahmana” (3.1.2.21) forbids the eating of either cow or bull, a revered ancient Hindu sage named Yajnavalkya immediately contradicts it, saying that, nevertheless, he eats the meat of both cow and bull, “as long as it’s tender.”


reference:http://theconversation.com/hinduism-and-its-complicated-history-with-cows-and-people-who-eat-them-80586

Virgins in Heaven in Hinduism


# In Hindu holy books it is written that more than thousands of young pre pubscent girls(Pedophile party in heaven) will be given to the Hindus.Therefore Hindu Gods are pimps of little girls  who supplies the Hindus with girls as sex slaves in Heaven, hence Hindu Heaven is a Brothel.

Parashara Smriti 3.28-29

“Thousands of celestial damsels, rush forward in a hurry towards a hero killed in battle, each proclaiming, ‘He is my lord, he is mine’.”

Parashara Smriti 3.31

“ If victorious, wealth is won; if death results, beautiful women fall to his share; since this corporeal frame is liable to perish in an instant’s time, why should we be shy of meeting death on a field of battle?”

CASTE SYSTEM, SLAVERY, UNTOUCHABILITY AND RACISM IN HINDUISM

# Brihaspati Smriti 23:10

"The nobles (kings and higher Castes) shall confiscate the whole wealth of him(lower Castes, shudras) having caused his genitals (penis) and scrotum to be cut off, if he (lower caste)shall resist then cause him to be paraded on an ass."

- Brihaspati Smriti 23:10

Hindus had religious law in their holy books  of the evil tradition of cutting off the penis (castration) of Slaves and lower castes and using them as Eunuch, it is mentioned in their holy book:

Oldest mention of castration of Slaves and lower castes in the entire world is mentioned in the Hindu Holy Books which call for the castration of lower castes to guard Ancient Hindu Higher Castes Whore/prostitute quarters, therefore the concept of castration of Slaves and lower castes has inspired the Eunuch systems of Europe and West Asia and such evil system originated in Hinduism.spread from Hindu India to  rest of the world along with slavery (according to historians over 4 billion lower Castes we're murdered by upper caste Hindus throughout History) :

Here are the verses from Hindu holy books:

Brihaspati Smriti 23:10

"The nobles (kings and higher Castes) shall confiscate the whole wealth of him(lower Castes, shudras) having caused his genitals (penis) and scrotum to be cut off, if he (lower caste)shall resist then cause him to be paraded on an ass."

- Brihaspati Smriti 23:10


#Hindu king called King Mihirkula in 600AD brought over millions of Buddhist sex slave girls and sold them throughout India.


Necrophilia in Hinduism


# According to Hinduism Hindu should actively have sex with dead bodies, this is also the reason of formation of Hindu saints called Aghori Sadhus who dwell in cremation ground who have sex with dead bodies of under age girls( rape) and eat their flesh ( cannibalism). Hindu Guru Yogi Adityanath says to rape the dead bodies of deceased people:

Reference: https://m.indiatimes.com/news/india/yogi-adityanaths-men-telling-hindus-to-rape-dead-muslim-women-is-beyond-shocking-230679.html

[divyam...@gmail.com]

The franses xeavier war a rapiest and he prositute the women and men too he was the rapiest and use to rape the 3 year old girl because the jesues sayes to rape every one xeavier has 92 wifes and 199 childrens and he marry his mother and make maney childrens

Why he do this because the holy bible tells this ro rape every one and the writer of bible jeesues the story of jeeaus is that jeesus has rape his mother and dog to start the world but he is mad because in the city the humans alredy exeist and the jeesues take his rapiest brother john for his mad prpoganda he goes and first rape his own mother and then after the king arrested the jeesyes and his brother john he kills jeesues for his sin but in jail jeesues write the mad book bible the jeesues tells that its leegal to marry with your sister and mother and all criatians do this same the jon got out from jail and he spread mad ativity in city king kill jeesues for his sin but his brother john kill 4000 people and king to became king after becameing king he make cmulsery for all to join criatinaty and all cristian culd cumpalsery to rape his mother and kill non cristians and this is going as usaul so the bibil is a book of devil and mad and all cristains incuding god is rapist and cild of a rapist father and after that he rapes his mother and pet animal like dog and cat


Throw this book of rape the jeesues is rapist and bloody prosicuter