Oh dear

[Ramapriya]

Crucial match and one of our most experienced batters is out with an injury. While Mukund played last when he was only 21, I doubt if he's Test class and with those two well-publicized dropped catches at Pune, I suspect it'll be pressure too much on the 27-yr old.

Vijay and Rahul seem to miss matches due to injuries with a worrying regularity :/

Ramapriya

[Arindam Banerjee]

Who cares, when batsmen are referred to as batters I lose interest in the whole game.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Even though it looks like modern cricket is a very profitable venture for
bookmakers and their associated Hollywood scriptwriters; still, India's latest
win over Australia had some of the satisfying elements of Trump's victory
over the corrupt US establishment.

[hamis...@gmail.com]

On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 8:45:36 PM UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>
> Even though it looks like modern cricket is a very profitable venture for
> bookmakers and their associated Hollywood scriptwriters; still, India's latest
> win over Australia had some of the satisfying elements of Trump's victory
> over the corrupt US establishment.

That'd be the guy who
- has had his charity shutdown because he was using it illegally
- has just settled on a lawsuit on trump university
- has a long history of not paying people who've actually done his construction work
- has settled several discrimination suits
- has admitted to trying to buy gaming licenses by doing fundraising for politicians...

[guypers]

Drumpf has not paid taxes for years, wont disclose tax returns, grabs women by their p....s, just for starters!

[alvey]

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:45:35 -0800 (PST), Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> India's latest
> win over Australia had some of the satisfying elements of Trump's victory
> over the corrupt US establishment.

Winner: Worst Analogy of the Month.





alvey

[basi...@gmail.com]

so you are saying it was a victory for evil over good then? Please be fair, sure Kohli might be a cunt, but he is not a Nazi!!

[guypers]

Kohli is a jerk, but not a cheat!!!?!?!

[Arindam Banerjee]

I am saying that Australia thought it was winning, like Hillary thought she
was winning, in the initial stages of result-declaration. One simply cannot
tell. Hillary is evil pure and simple, though not as evil as GB2, but more evil
than Obama. So I supported Trump who according to Ilya Shambat is a "loose
cannon" and according to me a real USAn. But in cricket, well it may be rigged
nicely but it is still a game, so moral issues give way to the rules of cricket
as opposed to notions of good and evil. That is the useful thing of all sports,
isn't it.

Kohli is Virat, or Great. I thought that after T1 he had become not-so-great
but his team-mates fought hard for him and India. Let us see what he does in
Ranchi. My facebook prediction has it that Australia has no chance in Ranchi.

As for as Nazis go, calling someone a Nazi is one sure way to stop any
discussion on the polite level. It is unreason and chaos, after that.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[Arindam Banerjee]

So what, he is not likely to start world wars. Above issues have nothing to
do with non-Americans like myself. What I care for is that there is less
chance of myself getting blown up anywhere thanks to bad US foreign policy, and
Trump that way is likely to be a far better potus than his predecessors.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Nothing to do with the rest of the world, mate. As I just wrote in another
post, the only thing non-USAns should care about the potus is how likely he
or she is to invade, terrorise, throw atom bombs, etc.

[de chucka]

It is getting OT but I'm also concerned about his effect on the world
economy if he starts down a protectionist path

[guypers]

Obama and Hillary are evil! No read further! Drumpf is a crook like his hero Vlad, in it for the money mostly screw the middle class, reduce taxes for the rich!!
BTW, created a new climate of bigotry and hate in the US, 3 IndonAmericans have been shot at, dont feel so smug, yankees are more racist than most Brits, Ozzies etc, only will get worse buddy!

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 10:52:00 AM UTC+11, guypers wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 5:44:26 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 11:34:16 PM UTC+11, hamis...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 8:45:36 PM UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Even though it looks like modern cricket is a very profitable venture for
> > > > bookmakers and their associated Hollywood scriptwriters; still, India's latest
> > > > win over Australia had some of the satisfying elements of Trump's victory
> > > > over the corrupt US establishment.
> > >
> > > That'd be the guy who
> > > - has had his charity shutdown because he was using it illegally
> > > - has just settled on a lawsuit on trump university
> > > - has a long history of not paying people who've actually done his construction work
> > > - has settled several discrimination suits
> > > - has admitted to trying to buy gaming licenses by doing fundraising for politicians...
> >
> > Nothing to do with the rest of the world, mate. As I just wrote in another
> > post, the only thing non-USAns should care about the potus is how likely he
> > or she is to invade, terrorise, throw atom bombs, etc.
>
> Obama and Hillary are evil! No read further! Drumpf is a crook like his hero Vlad, in it for the money mostly screw the middle class, reduce taxes for the rich!!

Maybe, so what's new. Looks like the lower middle classes voted for Trump bigly.

> BTW, created a new climate of bigotry and hate in the US, 3 IndonAmericans have been shot at, dont feel so smug, yankees are more racist than most Brits, Ozzies etc, only will get worse buddy!

They don't play cricket in USA. If no one wants to go to the USA thanks to
Trump then think what great good that will do to the world; the brain-drain will
stop, and maybe reverse.

[Arindam Banerjee]

The world should learn to take care of itself irrespective of the nature of
the potus and his or her policies.
Nobody wants to learn, and that is the problem.

[alvey]

Super-simplistic view of things there, which is all that can be expected
from a Trump supporter. There's a shedload of things that are expected of
potus. Me, I'd settle for intelligence & integrity. So that's a double F
for the incumbent.




alvey

[Mike Holmans]

You are presumably joking. Trump has no idea of foreign policy, has
already "masterminded" a raid which went badly wrong, and has
appointed people who were too aggressive for W's taste. Disastrous
military action by the US is exponentially more likely than under
Obama.

Cheers,

Mike

[Mike Holmans]

Trump is the first person to get anywhere near the reins of power who
thinks it odd that the USA hasn't used nuclear weapons since 1945.

You are a blind idiot. But then you apparently support Trump, and you
have to be a blind idiot to do so.



Cheers,

Mike

[Arindam Banerjee]

Trump is actually a very high IQ guy, so he faces a problem from the envious
lesser guys who had additionally negative integrity as well for they supported
the evil Hillary. He has to have a very high IQ, for he is a multi-billionaire
who first thrashed his Republic opponents and after that Hillary. He
certainly chose the best winning strategies, and that is a mark of the very
highest intelligence. The Gods and Goddesses were with Trump, so they ensured
a very satisfying victory for him by snatching it from his opposition in the
nick of time!

The main issue, I repeat, is whether or not the world will be a safer place
with Trump as potus. There is every reason to think this will be so, at any
rate relative to Hillary Clinton who according to Assange started the whole
refugee mess in Europe by killing Gaddafi in order to get elected.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
>
>
>
>
> alvey

[Ramapriya]

On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 4:42:48 AM UTC+4, Mike Holmans wrote:
>
> You are presumably joking. Trump has no idea of foreign policy, has
> already "masterminded" a raid which went badly wrong, and has
> appointed people who were too aggressive for W's taste. Disastrous
> military action by the US is exponentially more likely than under
> Obama.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike

I don't know if any US Prez has in the past been impeached but I'm reasonably sure that Trump would be. You heard it here first. Nearly each of his nominations has been underwhelming and the decision of including in his fold they who were until recently his fierce opponents is a disaster waiting to happen, and embarrassingly so.

The one decision he'll live to regret like hell is to spare Hillary. Not only can she can now unobtrusively work to derail him, he has in one go alienated a whole swathe of those who voted him for that very reason.

Ramapriya

[de chucka]

As all economies are linked to a lesser or greater these day a countries
policies on trade spread world wide

[de chucka]

Yes they do

[de chucka]

More people voted for Clinton

[de chucka]

The raid was planned under Obama

[alvey]

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:06:49 -0800 (PST), Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 11:35:30 AM UTC+11, alvey wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:44:23 -0800 (PST), Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 11:34:16 PM UTC+11, hamis...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 8:45:36 PM UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Even though it looks like modern cricket is a very profitable venture for
>>>>> bookmakers and their associated Hollywood scriptwriters; still, India's latest
>>>>> win over Australia had some of the satisfying elements of Trump's victory
>>>>> over the corrupt US establishment.
>>>>
>>>> That'd be the guy who
>>>> - has had his charity shutdown because he was using it illegally
>>>> - has just settled on a lawsuit on trump university
>>>> - has a long history of not paying people who've actually done his construction work
>>>> - has settled several discrimination suits
>>>> - has admitted to trying to buy gaming licenses by doing fundraising for politicians...
>>>
>>> Nothing to do with the rest of the world, mate. As I just wrote in another
>>> post, the only thing non-USAns should care about the potus is how likely he
>>> or she is to invade, terrorise, throw atom bombs, etc.
>>
>> Super-simplistic view of things there, which is all that can be expected
>> from a Trump supporter. There's a shedload of things that are expected of
>> potus. Me, I'd settle for intelligence & integrity. So that's a double F
>> for the incumbent.
>
> Trump is actually a very high IQ guy,

Prove it.

snip stuff based on questionable opening sentence.

>
> The main issue, I repeat, is whether or not the world will be a safer place
> with Trump as potus. There is every reason to think this will be so,

How about you name just *some* of those "every reason"? Or are you going to
mirror your hero by making unsupported declarations?

> at any
> rate relative to Hillary Clinton who according to Assange started the whole
> refugee mess in Europe by killing Gaddafi in order to get elected.

That's just typical twisting of history. Was it rose petals that Reagan's
bombers dropped on Libya in 1986?




alvey

[Mike Holmans]

On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:06:49 -0800 (PST), Arindam Banerjee

<banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:

>The main issue, I repeat, is whether or not the world will be a safer place
>with Trump as potus. There is every reason to think this will be so, at any
>rate relative to Hillary Clinton who according to Assange started the whole
>refugee mess in Europe by killing Gaddafi in order to get elected.

Julian Assange, the Russian agent. There's a trustworthy source. Not.

Cheers,

Mike

[guypers]

Wow, Arab spring took off and caused the death of Khaddafi, Change in Egypt, Obama killed off Osama, thank goodness!

[FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer]

On 3/5/2017 3:14 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 2:40:26 PM UTC+11, Ramapriya wrote:
>> Crucial match and one of our most experienced batters is out with an injury. While Mukund played last when he was only 21, I doubt if he's Test class and with those two well-publicized dropped catches at Pune, I suspect it'll be pressure too much on the 27-yr old.
>>
>> Vijay and Rahul seem to miss matches due to injuries with a worrying regularity :/
>>
>> Ramapriya
>
> Who cares, when batsmen are referred to as batters I lose interest in the whole game.
>

And who gives a fuck about whether u lose interest in the game?

Sit in front of a mirror and introspect yourself before posting
egotistic comments.

[FBInCIAnNSATerroristSlayer]

On 3/7/2017 1:45 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> On Sunday, March 5, 2017 at 10:14:34 PM UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>> On Saturday, March 4, 2017 at 2:40:26 PM UTC+11, Ramapriya wrote:
>>> Crucial match and one of our most experienced batters is out with an injury. While Mukund played last when he was only 21, I doubt if he's Test class and with those two well-publicized dropped catches at Pune, I suspect it'll be pressure too much on the 27-yr old.
>>>
>>> Vijay and Rahul seem to miss matches due to injuries with a worrying regularity :/
>>>
>>> Ramapriya
>>
>> Who cares, when batsmen are referred to as batters I lose interest in the whole game.
>

> Even though it looks like modern cricket is a very profitable venture for
> bookmakers and their associated Hollywood scriptwriters; still, India's latest
> win over Australia had some of the satisfying elements of Trump's victory
> over the corrupt US establishment.
>

You are one of the most confused life forms on rsc. U should not be
considered a human.

[alvey]

I only discovered last year that Assange is a Qld boy. Born in Townsville
and raised on Magnetic Is. Strange that that's not widely known...



alvey

[cricd...@hotmail.com]

On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 8:06:50 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> Trump is actually a very high IQ guy,

Ah, as the Aussies would say, you're taking an urination.

Good for you, although the kidney stones of your ignorance must be a
bitch to pass. On the one hand, it takes someone at Trump's IQ level
to recognize a fellow "very high IQ guy", while, on the other, the effort
taken to write a passable English sentence must be overwhelming,
your having sworn to use only the 57 words your leader knows.

(PSST: Obama is tapping your phone. Put on your tinfoil hat.)

Cheers.

[cricd...@hotmail.com]

On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 5:39:26 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> Hillary is evil pure and simple,

Apart from the evil of being a woman -- in your eyes, evil enough I'm sure --
what other evils? Concrete ones, mind you, not your usual vagueness, or hiding
behind the sexually abusive pants of Assange.

> So I supported Trump

Fantastic! Gave him money, did you? Or just by the formidable power of your
mind?

> Kohli is Virat, or Great.

Ah, first name is destiny.

A-rind-am: what's that?
You're the rind of something, but what?
Apple? Asteroid? Asshole?

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 11:42:48 AM UTC+11, Mike Holmans wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 14:41:58 -0800 (PST), Arindam Banerjee
> <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 1:06:13 AM UTC+11, guypers wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 7:34:16 AM UTC-5, hamis...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 8:45:36 PM UTC+11, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Even though it looks like modern cricket is a very profitable venture for
> >> > > bookmakers and their associated Hollywood scriptwriters; still, India's latest
> >> > > win over Australia had some of the satisfying elements of Trump's victory
> >> > > over the corrupt US establishment.
> >> >
> >> > That'd be the guy who
> >> > - has had his charity shutdown because he was using it illegally
> >> > - has just settled on a lawsuit on trump university
> >> > - has a long history of not paying people who've actually done his construction work
> >> > - has settled several discrimination suits
> >> > - has admitted to trying to buy gaming licenses by doing fundraising for politicians...
> >>
> >> Drumpf has not paid taxes for years, wont disclose tax returns, grabs women by their p....s, just for starters!
> >
> >So what, he is not likely to start world wars. Above issues have nothing to
> >do with non-Americans like myself. What I care for is that there is less
> >chance of myself getting blown up anywhere thanks to bad US foreign policy, and
> >Trump that way is likely to be a far better potus than his predecessors.
>
> You are presumably joking. Trump has no idea of foreign policy,

Seeing the kind of foreign policy the West has had for the last few centuries,
this is a relief.

has
> already "masterminded" a raid which went badly wrong, and has
> appointed people who were too aggressive for W's taste. Disastrous
> military action by the US is exponentially more likely than under
> Obama.

No. Obama was a puppet. Trump is a businessman who won't waste money on
stupid and evil things.

Such is the hope anyway.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike

[Arindam Banerjee]

Did he say such thoughts loud to the world, or are the liars of the world
thinking and saying his supposed thoughts?

>
> You are a blind idiot. But then you apparently support Trump, and you
> have to be a blind idiot to do so.

My IQ is 200+, which makes me look like an idiot to most, such as abusive
liars like you.
I supported Trump over Hillary, because Hillary is evil and from what I have
heard and seen of Trump he is not evil. Certainly he has not done any evil
so far like Hillary.


>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike

[Arindam Banerjee]

It is self-evident that he is very high IQ as he became
Potus at 100 to 1 odds.
You cannot be a multi-billionaire without a very high IQ.

>
> snip stuff based on questionable opening sentence.
> >
> > The main issue, I repeat, is whether or not the world will be a safer place
> > with Trump as potus. There is every reason to think this will be so,
>
> How about you name just *some* of those "every reason"? Or are you going to
> mirror your hero by making unsupported declarations?

One reason is good enough. He will get along well with Putin. They will start
a very productive cold war which will be great for engineering. Trump has
enough sense to know that wars cost money so wars should be avoided. Evil
people like Hillary use other peoples' lives and money to satisfy their own
egos by making wars and invasions.

>
> > at any
> > rate relative to Hillary Clinton who according to Assange started the whole
> > refugee mess in Europe by killing Gaddafi in order to get elected.
>
> That's just typical twisting of history. Was it rose petals that Reagan's
> bombers dropped on Libya in 1986?

irrelevant to the issue. Reagan did not get Gaddafi killed. If you cannot
find the difference between what Reagan did to Libya and what Hillary did to
Libya leading to the refugee problem in Europe, there is nothing more to be said.
>
>
>
>
> alvey

[Arindam Banerjee]

He is Australian, and a hero of our time. Naturally he is not liked by
the slaveowning circuses.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Mike

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 7:44:53 PM UTC+11, cricd...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 7, 2017 at 5:39:26 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>
> > Hillary is evil pure and simple,
>
> Apart from the evil of being a woman -- in your eyes, evil enough I'm sure --
> what other evils? Concrete ones, mind you, not your usual vagueness, or hiding
> behind the sexually abusive pants of Assange.
>
> > So I supported Trump
>
> Fantastic! Gave him money, did you? Or just by the formidable power of your
> mind?

Whatever I did, he got elected and the brats are unhappy about this.

[Arindam Banerjee]

An Australian lady mentioned that she had been to the same school as Assange,
a few years ago. She had the highest regard for him. That is why I believe
Assange.
>
> alvey

[Arindam Banerjee]

All depends upon moods and fashions. These change, and along with mood and
fashion changes, trade policies change. If the US raises tariffs, there will
be counter-tariffs, local manufacture, more local jobs, etc.

[Arindam Banerjee]

As much as Indians?

[Arindam Banerjee]

In Sanskrit:
Ari = enemy
daman = subdue (not kill)

A variation of Ari-mardana or killer of enemies, Ari-Daman changes to Arindam as
a more civilised version of Ari-mardana.

> > You're the rind of something, but what?

Good, wonder it is that turns apes to men. Keep it up.

> > Apple? Asteroid? Asshole?

Keep on wondering, one day you'll get there.
To help you on your way -
https://www.facebook.com/arindam.banerjee.31149359

[hamis...@gmail.com]

no it wasn't
See
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/03/former-obama-official-deadly-yemen-raid-wasnt-planned-under-obamas-watch/

[usenet8988]

"Ramapriya" wrote in message ...

>I don't know if any US Prez has in the past been impeached but I'm reasonably sure that Trump would be.
> You heard it here first. Nearly each of his nominations has been underwhelming and the decision of including in his fold they who were until
> recently his fierce opponents is a disaster waiting to happen, and embarrassingly so.

Clinton and Nixon were impeached but neither were convicted. In order for the president to be removed from office, he/she has to be impeached and convicted. Impeachment requires simple majority in the judiciary committee and in the house. But a conviction requires a 2/3 votes in the senate. With the republicans controlling the congress, it is highly unlikely Trump will be impeached let alone be convicted unless something like a fool proof video of him and Putin watching golden showers. Remember, he may be unpopular with the general public, but has 82% approval rating among republicans.

>The one decision he'll live to regret like hell is to spare Hillary.

Pretty much all the agencies involved absolved her. There is nothing for Trump to go after her unless new evidence shows up.

-Billy

[de chucka]

I'll counter with Raid in Yemen: Risky From the Start and Costly in the
End https://tinyurl.com/gqh4s3h . However I'm not sure that rsc is the
right ng to go into the nuances of planned V " may not have been as
extensively planned under Obama’s administration as Team Trump initially
suggested."

[de chucka]

World recession?

[de chucka]

snip

>>> They don't play cricket in USA.
>>
>> Yes they do
>
> As much as Indians?

They play cricket in the USA, you said they didn't. You were wrong NEXT

[de chucka]

What about the wall with Mexico. Hope there aren't to many more of these
people

The Texans who live on the ‘Mexican side’ of the border fence:
‘Technically, we’re in the United States’ https://tinyurl.com/zazl6sa

[Arindam Banerjee]

Not seriously.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Every nation has a right to protect its borders.

[Arindam Banerjee]

In a PG Wodehouse story, an American lady in England described cricket as
an excuse for sleep-walking.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[de chucka]

You'll have to ask the players how seriously they take it

[de chucka]

Maybe start here http://americancollegecricket.com/

[Arindam Banerjee]

May the good work continue.

[de chucka]

There is hope for the US although it didn't work in this case

"Cricket civilises people and creates good gentlemen. I want everyone to
play cricket in Zimbabwe; I want ours to be a nation of gentlemen."
Robert Mugabe

On the other hand
"It is not true that the English invented cricket as a way of making
all other human endeavours look interesting and lively; that was merely
an unintended side effect. I don't wish to denigrate a sport that is
enjoyed by millions, some of them awake and facing the right way, but it
is an odd game." Bill Bryson, Down Under (2000)

BTW an interesting page https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Cricket

[alvey]

So you have no proof.

>>
>> snip stuff based on questionable opening sentence.
>>>
>>> The main issue, I repeat, is whether or not the world will be a safer place
>>> with Trump as potus. There is every reason to think this will be so,
>>
>> How about you name just *some* of those "every reason"? Or are you going to
>> mirror your hero by making unsupported declarations?
>
> One reason is good enough. He will get along well with Putin. They will start
> a very productive cold war which will be great for engineering.

You are foaming mad.

> Trump has
> enough sense to know that wars cost money so wars should be avoided.

Yes, but it's not his money. And if wars are to be avoided, why does he
keep promising big increases in military spending?

> Evil
> people like Hillary use other peoples' lives and money to satisfy their own
> egos by making wars and invasions.

Oh that's just stupid.

>>
>>> at any
>>> rate relative to Hillary Clinton who according to Assange started the whole
>>> refugee mess in Europe by killing Gaddafi in order to get elected.
>>
>> That's just typical twisting of history. Was it rose petals that Reagan's
>> bombers dropped on Libya in 1986?
>
> irrelevant to the issue.

Horseshit.

> Reagan did not get Gaddafi killed. If you cannot
> find the difference between what Reagan did to Libya and what Hillary did to
> Libya leading to the refugee problem in Europe, there is nothing more to be said.

Yep, That's a runawayyyyyy. And in this case, I don't mind. In fact I'll
give you spending money.

[Arindam Banerjee]

No, it will be cold war. In tariff economies the world's financial situation is not important. National and local issues matter far more. Globalism has not
worked out well. It helps a shadowy elite and their henchmnen, who have no
scruples of any kind and to the extent it works, it does so by dehumanisation.
Nationalism will be far more supportive of the arts and sciences, as opposed
to judging everything solely in terms of money made by exclusionary processes.

Put in rsc context, bookmaking in cricket should go down in a cold war tariffed
de-globalised situation. Cricket will become a lot more boring, with more draws
as was the case. For it won't be scripted by the globalists. Whether
this will be a good thing or a bad thing, will be decided by those who value
intrinsic worth more or prefer artificiality and manipulation. The rules still
favour the former.

[de chucka]

I blame the Jews, Freemasons and the 1 world Government UN :-(

[Arindam Banerjee]

The above is proof enough. He is evidently a far more successful person than you are. And that is good enough for me.

> >>
> >> snip stuff based on questionable opening sentence.
> >>>
> >>> The main issue, I repeat, is whether or not the world will be a safer place
> >>> with Trump as potus. There is every reason to think this will be so,
> >>
> >> How about you name just *some* of those "every reason"? Or are you going to
> >> mirror your hero by making unsupported declarations?
> >
> > One reason is good enough. He will get along well with Putin. They will start
> > a very productive cold war which will be great for engineering.
>
> You are foaming mad.

No, I am the only one around with an IQ of 200+, and that upset the brainwashed
types like you who get your clues from the corrupt sources. Cold war produces
great technologies, such as the GPS which is used by all. Among plenty others,
like solar panels, materials, etc.

>
> > Trump has
> > enough sense to know that wars cost money so wars should be avoided.
>
> Yes, but it's not his money. And if wars are to be avoided, why does he
> keep promising big increases in military spending?

You spend on military, properly, to avoid wars. It would be best it they all
decided to spend money for space technology using the IFE, bring the world out
of misery using the HTN, but at this stage the brainwashed masses don't want
to know about new and great things. Sad. But, things may change, who knows.

To get some idea about the new and great things, people can see my new video
films on the great scope now available to all:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqBfwAClVlg
IFE - 1 Ground Experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9eGq4Oiv9s
IFE - 2 Experimental setups

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3hC48BMrno
IFE - 3 Pendulum experiments

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sSPxGsLkws
IFE - 4 Evolution of spaceship

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdM6UDPauU
IFE - 5 Hydrogen Transmission Network

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUAcx7rAplc
IFE - 6 Spaceship Design

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5Zbpvc3fdA
IFE - 7 Anti-Gravity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VA9LUwqMhxY
IFE - 8 New Physics

>
> > Evil
> > people like Hillary use other peoples' lives and money to satisfy their own
> > egos by making wars and invasions.
>
> Oh that's just stupid.

No, unfortunately that is not the case. Assange makes this point very clearly
in a video film.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NUoEIIMD6M

Hillary used her power to destroy a whole state, bringing turmoil to very many,
just to win her election - according to Assange.

> >>
> >>> at any
> >>> rate relative to Hillary Clinton who according to Assange started the whole
> >>> refugee mess in Europe by killing Gaddafi in order to get elected.
> >>
> >> That's just typical twisting of history. Was it rose petals that Reagan's
> >> bombers dropped on Libya in 1986?
> >
> > irrelevant to the issue.
>
> Horseshit.
>
> > Reagan did not get Gaddafi killed. If you cannot
> > find the difference between what Reagan did to Libya and what Hillary did to
> > Libya leading to the refugee problem in Europe, there is nothing more to be said.
>
> Yep, That's a runawayyyyyy. And in this case, I don't mind. In fact I'll
> give you spending money.

All you have is horseshit. I don't need it, thanks. Spread it around your
estate, liberally.

[Arindam Banerjee]

I don't know, as far as I am concerned the bigJew-gujJew combo pack has been
dead against me and all I try to do, going by my usenet and real life
experiences.

These guys are so powerful, no one dares to say anything; all run away with top
speed from me as they know I am a marked person! Still, the good thing about
that lot is that they have not killed me yet, and of that I approve. And I do
admit that within their limitations they are good; or rather, of the better
kind among the dominant whites.

Unfortunately, the better is the natural enemy of the best.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

check out my videos:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NUoEIIMD6M

[de chucka]

I was not being serious and I hope you aren't either

>
> Cheers,
> Arindam Banerjee
>
> check out my videos:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NUoEIIMD6M

NO
>

[alvey]

On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:06:44 -0800 (PST), usenet8988 wrote:

> "Ramapriya" wrote in message ...
>
>> I don't know if any US Prez has in the past been impeached but I'm
>> reasonably sure that Trump would be. You heard it here first. Nearly
>> each of his nominations has been underwhelming and the decision of
>> including in his fold they who were until recently his fierce opponents
>> is a disaster waiting to happen, and embarrassingly so.
>
> Clinton and Nixon were impeached but neither were convicted.

This is incorrect. Nixon resigned to avoid almost certain impeachment.




alvey

[de chucka]

>>> One reason is good enough. He will get along well with Putin. They will start
>>> a very productive cold war which will be great for engineering.
>>
>> You are foaming mad.
>
> No, I am the only one around with an IQ of 200+,

Are you really claiming an IQ 7 SD above average", if so please supply
the evidence. Shit Hawkings only has an IQ of 162 on the Mensa IQ test.

I don't often agree with Alvey but on the evidence "You are foaming mad.

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 11:42:15 AM UTC+11, De Chucka wrote:
> >>> One reason is good enough. He will get along well with Putin. They will start
> >>> a very productive cold war which will be great for engineering.
> >>
> >> You are foaming mad.
> >
> > No, I am the only one around with an IQ of 200+,
>
>
> Are you really claiming an IQ 7 SD above average", if so please supply
> the evidence. Shit Hawkings only has an IQ of 162 on the Mensa IQ test.

Hawking is a curse to the future of humanity. Physics has been corrupted since
all the e=mcc nonsense, but I have set it right with my video films.

> I don't often agree with Alvey but on the evidence "You are foaming mad.

No, I am eminently sane, and also, perfectly moral. Only, beyond the mental and emotional scope of chaps like you and most of the rest. I relate to Newton, da Vinci, Tesla... and Kalidas on the other hand. That this, those divinely blessed with 200+ IQ (Intellect quotient, in our case).

Racists and bigots like you will find my works beyond your scope, but never
mind, small-mindedness such as yours gives way to the pressures of necessity,
sooner or later.

Anyway, all this is not quite about cricket, so bye.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 12:04:37 PM UTC+11, guypers wrote:

> AB is very confused about politics, should stick to cricket, at least wont make a fool of himself!!

I only appear to make a fool of myself. As for politics, I cannot be such a
fool can I, when I have in public posts in usenet and also to my friends declared:

- Obama would win, when no one thought he would
- In the Indian general election, Congress would get only about 50 seats when
they were expecting to get over 250 as per polls and all authorities
- Trump would win, when his chances were 100 to 1

Not that I am keen on politics, really.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[Arindam Banerjee]

heh heh heh heh Your racism and bigotry is so precious to me isn't it.
Keep on living with your small mind!

[cricd...@hotmail.com]

On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 7:54:58 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> In Sanskrit:
> Ari = enemy
> daman = subdue (not kill)

Someone makes a flippant remark about your name, and you feel the
need to dip into fake Sanskrit? Man, I love the poorly educated.
(Not to mention the sub-250 IQ wallas.)

Jokester though you are, your insecurities match those of your beloved
leader. Tell us, how big are your hands?

[de chucka]

snip

> heh heh heh heh Your racism and bigotry is so precious to me isn't it.
> Keep on living with your small mind!
>

Sorry I am racist about which race and bigoted about what?

[de chucka]

Don't worry I'll remember your laughable 200+ IQ claim you foaming madman

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 2:34:51 PM UTC+11, cricd...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 7:54:58 AM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> > In Sanskrit:
> > Ari = enemy
> > daman = subdue (not kill)
>
> Someone makes a flippant remark about your name, and you feel the
> need to dip into fake Sanskrit? Man, I love the poorly educated.
> (Not to mention the sub-250 IQ wallas.)

The subdued folk could become somewhat unpleasant.

>
> Jokester though you are, your insecurities match those of your beloved
> leader. Tell us, how big are your hands?

They are not big; they have been noted for their loveliness. I made good use to them to make the first internal force engine, that works on updated physics.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Ask yourself that, and you may find.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Good.

[de chucka]

So you just threw it out there as an ad hom. Oh well

[Arindam Banerjee]

Ask yourself why you are so reluctant to watch the videos. You could have
just ignored them like most do. The vehement "NO" from your side was
revealing.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Seems to me, that the world is more scared than mice when it has anything to
do with what I do. Abuse is what I get from the braindead, brainwashed, morons.
Others are too scared to open the video links, for fear of persecution from
Big Brother. What a miserable world I live in!

[de chucka]

Please expand on the insight you saw with your 7 deviations above average IQ
>

[de chucka]

I just couldn't be bothered
>

[cricd...@hotmail.com]

On Wednesday, March 8, 2017 at 11:27:03 PM UTC-5, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> They are not big; they have been noted for their loveliness.
> I made good use to them to make the first internal force engine,
> that works on updated physics.

Now you're wandering into full incoherence, not the semi- of your other
ramblings. Take care of yourself. Stick to "batsman" vs "batter" where you're
on surer footing.

[patt...@gmail.com]

Thread has turned into a game of Spot The Loony.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Go through the videos and you may get a faint idea.

[Arindam Banerjee]

Sorry, I was talking mostly to myself! One needs to encourage oneself, to keep
one's balance in this world, and that is why I was making sense to just myself.

As for the "batter" business, whenever I hear that I think of fried something or
the other. I can't think of an uglier word to replace "batsman".

[Arindam Banerjee]

Thus my point is made.
> >

[Arindam Banerjee]

If feminists are not annoyed by "Batwoman" or "Catwoman" I don't see why
they should object to "batswoman", and give us back the manly term "batsman".

But then, such mice are modern men, no one among them will dare to make such a
suggestion, just go along with the fashionable whims.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

[usenet8988]

My bad. I stand corrected. Judiciary committee voted in favor of impeachment but the house never voted on it, because of his resignation.

[alvey]

np.

Pity it didn't happen.



alvey

[de chucka]

Remember Nixon is not guilty of anything he was pardoned by Ford for
anything and everything he'd done
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pardon_of_Richard_Nixon

[alvey]

One of the defining disillusionment moments of a generation.



alvey