Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

LSJ: dual card types

2 views
Skip to first unread message

talonz

unread,
Dec 24, 2008, 1:31:13 AM12/24/08
to
Not seeing this in the rulebook nor google of nsgrp.

Is a dual card type considered both types at all times, or only the
relevant type when played?

ie: a combat/action card, is it considered a combat(or action) card at
all times, or only when played for the combat effect?

T

John Flournoy

unread,
Dec 24, 2008, 3:25:23 AM12/24/08
to
On Dec 24, 12:31 am, talonz <talon...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Not seeing this in the rulebook nor google of nsgrp.
>
> Is a dual card type considered both types at all times, or only the
> relevant type when played?

It is considered to be the relevant type when played.

> ie: a combat/action card, is it considered a combat(or action) card at
> all times, or only when played for the combat effect?

It is considered a combat card whenever it is not being played instead
as an action card.

Basically, when you are in the act of playing it, it counts as
whatever type and requirement you are playing it as.

The rest of the time, it counts as all the options on it.

For instance, Diversion counts as a card that requires Celerity when
it's in your library or hand; when you play it to prevent damage
you're playing it as a Fortitude card and thus it doesn't currently
count as one requiring Celerity.

> T

-John Flournoy

LSJ

unread,
Dec 24, 2008, 8:14:41 AM12/24/08
to

Correct.

0 new messages