Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Daniel Negreanu = Skimask555 = Total Idiot - Replay

14 views
Skip to first unread message

GROAN

unread,
Dec 12, 2002, 3:23:25 PM12/12/02
to
Don't ever, ever, ever accuse Russ or anyone else of furthering their
Agenda by creating other aliases and posting behind them. I also
don't want to hear about your shining integrity or honesty any more
either. You just killed all your credibility. People might say the
same applies to me, but I never pretended to be goodness and light.

Genius Danny Boy here forgot to change his screenname BACK from
Skimask555 to his normal haloed "DanielNegreanu" when answering Tom
Weideman in the thread "A big tournament advantage: Stupidity":


On 12 Dec 2002 18:53:32 GMT, skima...@aol.com (Skimask555) wrote:

>>advantage: Stupidity
>>From: Tom Weideman zwi...@attbi.com
>
>>Now of course the best of both worlds would be a person who is actually
>>intelligent but has fostered a persona of being dim-witted. I think this
>>would be hard to do, because eventually his actions will give him away, but
>>it might be possible to pull off for awhile.
>
> I've agreed with most everything you've said, especially this. I would say
>though, that it is possiblie to pull it off for longer than just 'awhile'.
>There are many winning tournament players on the crcuit today who fall directly
>into this category. A perfect example of this would be Hon "Kamikaze" Le.
>
> He is a super aggressive player that is feared by many of his peers. Not for
>his playing ability or skill level, more because of the idea that he might do
>something stupid against you. Example:
>
> You are the chipleader in the SB against Hon Le who is second in chips in the
>big blind with 7 players left in the tournament. The other five players have
>really short stacks. Against any typically "smart" opponent you'd know that
>they won't gamble foolishly, so if you raise and they re-raise,you can be sure
>they have a strong hand. Not so with Hon Le, at least that's the image he
>gives off.
>
> Men Nguyen, John Bonetti, and Layne Flack to a lesser degree, also give off
>this false image of stupidity, that gives them an advantage in winning the
>"chicken game"
>
>Daniel Negreanu
>www.fullcontactpoker.com


Noticed the 'facts' about Tournament players, style, and the subtle
HUGE SIGNATURE at the end of Skimask555's post. That means HE (Daniel
Negreanu) was the one slandering Annie Duke just hours after her
exceptional ABC interview. Talk about uncontrolled jealousy over the
poker spotlight. Here is the first appearance of "Skibum555" - of
course its cowardly broad hinting about UB/Aruba and Annie Duke:

http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=20021209130559.28589.00000195%40mb-fa.aol.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fsafe%3Dimages%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26as_ugroup%3Drec.gambling.poker%26as_uauthors%3Dskimask555%40aol.com%26lr%3D%26hl%3Den

Notice that the "Ski Bum" who originated this questioning of Annie and
UB thread also is Skima...@aol.com. Also notice that I called him a
total idiot even then, which I am very proud of. Perhaps even
sublimally I can detect Daniel's level of stupidity.

Hey UB / Annie - SUE THIS GUY if he is under any kind of NDA. His
idiocy is staggering, he will lose.

Jeff V

unread,
Dec 12, 2002, 5:19:55 PM12/12/02
to
Skimask would be a good alias though. Jeff V (or not?)

_________________________________________________________________
Posted using RecPoker.com - http://www.recpoker.com


AJohn808

unread,
Dec 12, 2002, 6:25:00 PM12/12/02
to
hey, guess what GROAN. because its you thats trying to stir something up here,
i don't think anybody cares. your only hope is to go away and come back under a
new alias yourself.

Danielnegreanu

unread,
Dec 12, 2002, 8:53:10 PM12/12/02
to
Wow, very creative if I do say so myself. Sorry to disappoint you GROAN, but
I am not skimask555. I don't even post here under danieln...@aol.com, or
kidp...@hotmail.com.

Prior to this post, I've made a grand total of two posts in the last couple
months.

Daniel Negreanu
kidp...@hotmail.com
www.fullcontactpoker.com

NWBurbsCouple

unread,
Dec 12, 2002, 9:41:17 PM12/12/02
to
From: danieln...@aol.com (Danielnegreanu)

>>I don't even post here under danieln...@aol.com,

Huh?


Barbara Yoon

unread,
Dec 12, 2002, 10:23:36 PM12/12/02
to
"Danielnegreanu":

> Wow, very creative if I do say so myself. Sorry to disappoint
> you GROAN, but I am not skimask555. I don't even post here
> under danieln...@aol.com, or kidp...@hotmail.com.
> Prior to this post, I've made a grand total of two posts in the last
> couple months. Daniel Negreanu

Daniel.....as you likely saw, for reasons still unknown to me, I myself
was the first target of the 'identity forgers' -- and unfortunately, some
RGP'ers actually fell for the forgeries at that time, and they believed that
those posts really were from me (thereby, regrettably, costing me some
of my RGP friends too) -- but since then, other RGP'ers too have been
so forged, even including yourself now -- but at least most RGP'ers now
know what's going on, and the forgeries are not so gullibly believed by
as many as they were just a few months ago...

Peg Smith

unread,
Dec 12, 2002, 11:20:59 PM12/12/02
to
In article <atbjur$ncu$1...@bob.news.rcn.net>, "Barbara Yoon" <by...@erols.com>
writes:

>Daniel.....as you likely saw, for reasons still unknown to me, I myself
>was the first target of the 'identity forgers' -- and unfortunately, some
>RGP'ers actually fell for the forgeries at that time, and they believed that
>those posts really were from me (thereby, regrettably, costing me some
>of my RGP friends too) -- but since then, other RGP'ers too have been
>so forged, even including yourself now -- but at least most RGP'ers now
>know what's going on, and the forgeries are not so gullibly believed by
>as many as they were just a few months ago...

Get over yourself, Barbara/Lawrence. "Forgering an identity" is not the same as
signing someone else's name to a post. We were all here, too, when you botched
up your own forgery, dear, so you may not want to open that issue again.

Peg

Peg

Barbara Yoon

unread,
Dec 12, 2002, 11:54:16 PM12/12/02
to
>> Daniel.....as you likely saw, for reasons still unknown to me, I myself
>> was the first target of the 'identity forgers' -- and unfortunately, some
>> RGP'ers actually fell for the forgeries at that time, and they believed that
>> those posts really were from me (thereby, regrettably, costing me some
>> of my RGP friends too) -- but since then, other RGP'ers too have been
>> so forged, even including yourself now -- but at least most RGP'ers now
>> know what's going on, and the forgeries are not so gullibly believed by
>> as many as they were just a few months ago...

Peg Smith:


> Get over yourself, Barbara/Lawrence. "Forgering an identity" is not
> the same as signing someone else's name to a post. We were all here,
> too, when you botched up your own forgery, dear, so you may not
> want to open that issue again.

Peg.....I can say that I've never forged anybody else's name to any
RGP post -- but then you are free to believe whatever else you want...

Peg Smith

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 12:09:03 AM12/13/02
to
In article <atbp8m$c8b$1...@bob.news.rcn.net>, "Barbara Yoon" <by...@erols.com>
writes:

>Peg.....I can say that I've never forged anybody else's name to any
>RGP post --

That's not what I said you did. What you did was make a post with a lousy
attempt at making it look like it was posted from RecPoker.com. A few computer
geeks, including a friend of mine, are certain the post was yours. So every
time you start bitching about the forgeries again, I'm going to bring that up.
Deal?

Peg

dave keiser

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 12:19:56 AM12/13/02
to
Hey peg it must make your day seeing Daniel and Barbara/Lawrence both here
in the same thread so you can flame away. I guess Yoon/Hill gets priority
because he's on your permanent shit list. :)


We were all here, too, when you botched up your own forgery, dear, so you
may not want to open that issue again.
>
> Peg

_________________________________________________________________

Peg Smith

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 12:23:45 AM12/13/02
to
In article <06eK9.917291$H65.1...@post-02.news.easynews.com>, "dave keiser"
<anon...@aol.com> writes:

>...I guess Yoon/Hill gets priority


>because he's on your permanent shit list. :)

Exactly. Danny may yet find his balls; Lawrence is still denying his.

Peg

Barbara Yoon

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 12:35:05 AM12/13/02
to
"dave keiser":

>> I guess Yoon/Hill gets priority because he's on your permanent shit list. :)

"Peg Smith":


> Exactly. Danny may yet find his balls; Lawrence is still denying his.

Ahh.....THAT explains it....."dave keiser" and "Peg Smith" together...!!

Peg Smith

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 12:41:25 AM12/13/02
to
In article <atbrl6$jgm$1...@bob.news.rcn.net>, "Barbara Yoon" <by...@erols.com>
writes:

>Ahh.....THAT explains it....."dave keiser" and "Peg Smith" together...!!

Explains what, Lawrence? Do tell.

Peg

Homer J. Simpson

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 11:07:26 AM12/13/02
to
Who gives a fuck? This is supposed to be a poker website. Fucking morons.

Robert Ladd

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 11:58:20 AM12/13/02
to
I bet the "morons" know the difference between a website and a newsgroup.

Robert Ladd

"Homer J. Simpson" <anon...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1BnK9.1404712$O87.1...@news.easynews.com...

Homer J. Simpson

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 2:54:31 PM12/13/02
to
Actually, I posted from RecPoker.com, which is a website. Yes, I realize
that I am posting to a newsgroup from that website, but geez, what
difference does it make whether I use the word "website" or "newsgroup"?
It's not like using the word "website" rather than "newsgroup" makes my
post incomprehensible.

Anyway, thanks for proving my point that all people here do is bitch and
whine about unimportant topics that have nothing to do with poker, and
nothing to do with their lives. It is amazing that poker threads are
entirely ignored, while posts by trolls such as that low-life cheater GCA
generate a shitload of responses. I simply think this board would be
better if people discussed poker once in a while.

-- Homer

Robert Ladd

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 3:11:40 PM12/13/02
to
You mean like you're doing?

Robert Ladd

"Homer J. Simpson" <anon...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:XVqK9.1421229$O87.1...@news.easynews.com...

Homer J. Simpson

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 3:32:25 PM12/13/02
to
Well, almost, but not exactly. You see, most people are just bitching.
I, however, am bitching about the bitching.

Homer J. Simpson

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 3:33:37 PM12/13/02
to
By the way, you are doing an excellent job of baiting me. Keep up the
good work.

susan

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 3:39:46 PM12/13/02
to
you don't post from where you just posted?

"Danielnegreanu" <danieln...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20021212205310...@mb-fd.aol.com...

Craig Permenter

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 3:41:05 PM12/13/02
to
Robert is studing for his "master baiting" license. :)

Rumor has it he has really been "pulling some all nighters" lately.


"Homer J. Simpson" <anon...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:BurK9.956469$6N5.1...@post-03.news.easynews.com...

Perry Friedman

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 3:50:21 PM12/13/02
to
In article <BurK9.956469$6N5.1...@post-03.news.easynews.com>,

Homer J. Simpson <anon...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>By the way, you are doing an excellent job of baiting me. Keep up the
>good work.
>
>-- Homer

But *I* am the master Baiter.

GROAN

unread,
Dec 13, 2002, 4:21:43 PM12/13/02
to
On 13 Dec 2002 01:53:10 GMT, danieln...@aol.com (Danielnegreanu)
wrote:

---------------------------------------------^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^-------------------------


> Wow, very creative if I do say so myself. Sorry to disappoint you GROAN, but
>I am not skimask555. I don't even post here under danieln...@aol.com, or
>kidp...@hotmail.com.
>
> Prior to this post, I've made a grand total of two posts in the last couple
>months.
>
>Daniel Negreanu


You just prove your own stupidity day in and day out. You are
reaching RAZZO levels of self-inflicted gunshot wounds to your
reputation for intelligence.

The only thing that can be more sickly entertaining is watching you
(functional retard) argue Math and Statistics with Tom Weideman (PhD
in physics) as you have in the past. Razzo levels on the
unintentional comedy scale.

Newgca

unread,
Dec 14, 2002, 4:01:50 AM12/14/02
to
> I don't even post here under danieln...@aol.com

But this is YOUR E MAIL address on AOL. So unless it was forged, this is your e
mail address. Did someone also forge the e mails with danieln...@aol.com to
me?

Russ Georgiev

KrisppyKreme

unread,
Dec 14, 2002, 7:25:10 PM12/14/02
to
In article <XVqK9.1421229$O87.1...@news.easynews.com>, "Homer J. Simpson"
<anon...@hotmail.com> writes:

> I simply think this board would be
>better if people discussed poker once in a while.

For a great many of us poker is boring. It is the peripheral events that make
RGP interesting.

Krisppy Kreme

JackGierC

unread,
Dec 15, 2002, 8:37:24 PM12/15/02
to
>For a great many of us poker is boring. It is the peripheral events that
>make
>RGP interesting.
>
>Krisppy Kreme
>

Well said.

0 new messages