<
thekma...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:66e40665-a398-4bea...@googlegroups.com...
>> > Peter Larsen wrote:
>> >> My opinion is that the best choice for a good mp3 is to
>> >> samplerate
>> >> convert to 32 kHz sample rate first because that allows more
>> >> bits of
>> >> resolution in the treble range than insisting on getting 20 kHz,
>> > You mean 64khz
>> I mean 32 kHz sample rate, that is why I wrote it.
> Your terms are vague and unclear.
You're a fucking idiot. He recommended a converting to a 32 kHz sample
rate, and he clearly explained the reason. It seemed like a very
reasonable suggestion. His terminology crystal clear to anyone with
even a rudimentary understanding of digital audio. You don't have that
understanding, but that's not Larsen's fault.
When you have no clue what you're blithering about, you always seem to
blame everyone else, sometimes even getting angry at others for your
own stupidity. You brag about having an MIS degree. And you brag about
not understanding any of the undergraduate math. Did the Dean of the
UConn School of Business really give you a waiver on the math
requirements, and give you a worthless piece of BS toilet paper in
MIS, without the required education? Just to get your sorry ass out of
his life and away from his campus?
You haven't shown much sing of any desire or willingness to learn. On
the contrary, you deny the knowledge of experienced experts, and
insult them by telling them that they are wrong, and you (a fucking
idiot) are right. I can see why the school wanted you to get the fuck
out.