Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Mike Pence.

101 views
Skip to first unread message

trotsky

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 5:14:50 PM10/8/17
to
Pence said he left the Colts game because of "disrespect to the flag"
but I'm pretty sure it was because his assless chaps were chafing.

bruce2...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 5:24:49 PM10/8/17
to
The Republican National Committee isn't paying Pence's legal bills, like with Trump and Jr.

I wonder why?

trotsky

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 5:37:38 PM10/8/17
to
On 10/8/17 4:24 PM, bruce2...@gmail.com wrote:
> The Republican National Committee isn't paying Pence's legal bills, like with Trump and Jr.
>
> I wonder why?


That's a really good question.


RichA

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 5:43:17 PM10/8/17
to
On Sunday, 8 October 2017 17:14:50 UTC-4, trotsky wrote:
> Pence said he left the Colts game because of "disrespect to the flag"
> but I'm pretty sure it was because his assless chaps were chafing.

Nice to see someone with the guts to stand up to the overpaid, overprivileged, ungrateful, disrespectful black players and the white toadies who do what they do.

FPP

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 6:11:57 PM10/8/17
to
Pence still wants a career after 2020.

--
"Donald Trump accepted the Republican nomination Thursday July 22nd."
"ISIS claimed responsibility". - J. P. Shanley

Ubiquitous

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 6:13:08 PM10/8/17
to
In article <czwCB.2746$D83....@fx04.iad>, gms...@email.com wrote:

>Pence said he left the Colts game because of "disrespect to the flag"
>but I'm pretty sure it was because his assless chaps were chafing.

And you posted this off-topic article here because?

--
Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd
have to audit liberals & wire tap reporters' phones.

FPP

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 6:32:43 PM10/8/17
to
On 10/8/17 7:12 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> In article <czwCB.2746$D83....@fx04.iad>, gms...@email.com wrote:
>
>> Pence said he left the Colts game because of "disrespect to the flag"
>> but I'm pretty sure it was because his assless chaps were chafing.
>
> And you posted this off-topic article here because?
>

Moron says what?

thinbl...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 6:34:26 PM10/8/17
to
On Sunday, October 8, 2017 at 6:11:57 PM UTC-4, FPP wrote:
> On 10/8/17 5:37 PM, trotsky wrote:
> > On 10/8/17 4:24 PM, bruce2...@gmail.com wrote:

> >> The Republican National Committee isn't paying Pence's legal bills,
> >> like with Trump and Jr.


> >> I wonder why?


> > That's a really good question.


> Pence still wants a career after 2020.


Yes, he does. That is why Mike Pence in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4JEc_VmSLg

has color coordinated his outfit to match Hillary Clinton.
http://i.imgbox.com/LF3KZA1f.jpg



trotsky

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 6:44:04 PM10/8/17
to
How many head traumas did you say you suffered from?

thinbl...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 6:49:43 PM10/8/17
to
You unfortunately have me confused with Hillary Clinton, I'm not the one with the head trauma.

4 Eyes, 10 Thumbs and a Forked Tongue: Hillary Clinton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtfxZT_lqv8

trotsky

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 7:17:22 PM10/8/17
to
Have you considered teaming up with Anim8r to consolidate your misogyny?

thinbl...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 8, 2017, 7:32:46 PM10/8/17
to
Well, actually things are improving here on the American front. I am being labelled a misogynist by trotsky and vile by Kerman. I no longer an being called anti-semitic.

----------

Gawd Blesh Uh-mer-ca!

Meet the Jewish Billionaires Shaping the 2016 Presidential Election
read more: https://www.haaretz.com/jewish/features/1.658520

https://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.658521.1432808767!/image/35345611.jpg

https://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.658530.1432809206!/image/866195570.jpg

mog...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 9, 2017, 1:46:57 PM10/9/17
to
This quote shows that Pence flew cross country just to spend like 5 minutes at the Indianapolis game. A total taxpayer waste of dollars:

"The cost of flying from Las Vegas to Indianapolis and then back west to Los Angeles, a tab CNN puts at $242,500—roughly $200k more than if he’d simply flown from Vegas to L.A. In a statement, a Pence aide defended the side trip: “If the Vice President did not go to Indiana for the Colts game, he would have flown back to D.C. for the evening—which means flying directly over Indiana. Instead, he made a shorter trip to Indiana for a game that was on his schedule for several week"

MIKE PENCE SPENT NEARLY $250,000 TO WALK OUT OF A FOOTBALL GAME
Vanity Fair - Oct. 9, 2017
-- https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/10/mike-pence-colts-game

mog...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 9, 2017, 1:48:52 PM10/9/17
to
These blacks and whites aren't wasting taxpayer dollars on needless cross-country luxury flights like the Trumpers are, either.
Why are you quiet about that?

Pete

unread,
Oct 9, 2017, 4:42:48 PM10/9/17
to
In article <684c8878-8402-466e...@googlegroups.com>,
<mog...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>This quote shows that Pence flew cross country just to spend like 5
>minutes at the Indianapolis game. A total taxpayer waste of dollars:
>
>"The cost of flying from Las Vegas to Indianapolis and then back west to
>Los Angeles, a tab CNN puts at $242,500—roughly $200k more than if
>he’d simply flown from Vegas to L.A. In a statement, a Pence aide
>defended the side trip: “If the Vice President did not go to Indiana
>for the Colts game, he would have flown back to D.C. for the
>evening—which means flying directly over Indiana. Instead, he made a
>shorter trip to Indiana for a game that was on his schedule for several
>week"
>
>MIKE PENCE SPENT NEARLY $250,000 TO WALK OUT OF A FOOTBALL GAME
>Vanity Fair - Oct. 9, 2017
>-- https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/10/mike-pence-colts-game

Just to reinforce the point, this BBC article reports that the
media were told *beforehand* that Pence was going to walk out!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-41544567

(see Anthony Zurcher's commentary section of the article)


FPP

unread,
Oct 9, 2017, 5:41:34 PM10/9/17
to
What are you bitching about? It isn't your money.

Oh wait...

--
"It's a shame the White House has become an adult day care center.
Someone obviously missed their shift this morning." - Senator Bob
Corker,‏ TN.
Republican Chairman of Foreign Relations Committee 10-8-17

Breezy Eason

unread,
Oct 9, 2017, 5:48:20 PM10/9/17
to
On Sunday, October 8, 2017 at 2:24:49 PM UTC-7, bruce2...@gmail.com wrote:
> The Republican National Committee isn't paying Pence's legal bills, like with Trump and Jr.
>
> I wonder why?

Dumb Ass! ... Pence has NO legal Bills ... what ACTUAL Crimes has he been charged with? ... Where are you getting all this DUMB information from? CNN Fake News?!

Breezy Eason

unread,
Oct 9, 2017, 5:53:40 PM10/9/17
to
or about 1/15th what Obama's mate and offspring charged Taxpayers ... for ... 3 trips to Africa ... 4 to Europe ... are you competing with brucie2 ... for "Dumbest Poster in Google Groups?"

Liliana Salazar

unread,
Oct 10, 2017, 10:37:50 AM10/10/17
to
In article <czwCB.2746$D83....@fx04.iad>, gms...@email.com wrote:

>Pence said he left the Colts game because of "disrespect to the flag"
>but I'm pretty sure it was because his assless chaps were chafing.

https://www.newsdemon.com/abuse.php

FORBIDDEN ACTIVITIES

NewsDemon has a zero-tolerance policy for the following activities,
performing any of them will cause permanent suspension of your posting
ability and possibly your ability to read newsgroups. These activities
include, but are not limited to:

- Posting Off-Topic: Posting something that does not belong in that
newsgroup, as indicated by its charter or FAQ.



trotsky

unread,
Oct 11, 2017, 6:42:45 AM10/11/17
to
On 10/8/17 6:32 PM, thinbl...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday, October 8, 2017 at 7:17:22 PM UTC-4, trotsky wrote:
>> On 10/8/17 5:49 PM, thinbl...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Sunday, October 8, 2017 at 6:44:04 PM UTC-4, trotsky wrote:
>>>> On 10/8/17 5:34 PM, thinbl...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> On Sunday, October 8, 2017 at 6:11:57 PM UTC-4, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/8/17 5:37 PM, trotsky wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/8/17 4:24 PM, bruce2...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Republican National Committee isn't paying Pence's legal bills,
>>>>>>>> like with Trump and Jr.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wonder why?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's a really good question.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Pence still wants a career after 2020.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, he does. That is why Mike Pence in this video
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4JEc_VmSLg
>>>>>
>>>>> has color coordinated his outfit to match Hillary Clinton.
>>>>> http://i.imgbox.com/LF3KZA1f.jpg
>>>
>>>
>>>> How many head traumas did you say you suffered from?
>>>
>>> You unfortunately have me confused with Hillary Clinton, I'm not the one with the head trauma.
>>>
>>> 4 Eyes, 10 Thumbs and a Forked Tongue: Hillary Clinton
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtfxZT_lqv8
>
>
>> Have you considered teaming up with Anim8r to consolidate your misogyny?
>
> Well, actually things are improving here on the American front. I am being labelled a misogynist by trotsky and vile by Kerman. I no longer an being called anti-semitic.


Yes you an, just not in this thread.

trotsky

unread,
Oct 11, 2017, 6:44:26 AM10/11/17
to
I knew one of these beatoffs would get to the "He's just as shitty as
Obama" claim.

bruce2...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 11, 2017, 8:46:56 AM10/11/17
to
By End of August, Trump Will Have Spent Three Times As Many Days At Leisure As Obama
Washington Post - August 3, 2017
--https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/08/03/by-end-of-august-trump-will-have-spent-three-times-as-many-days-at-leisure-as-obama/

Ubiquitous

unread,
Oct 12, 2017, 2:27:01 PM10/12/17
to
Remember how the left mocked Mike Pence for his "no dining with women"
rule? Guess who's laughing now.

bruce2...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 12, 2017, 3:00:48 PM10/12/17
to
Ubiquitous wrote:
>Remember how the left mocked Mike Pence for his "no dining with women"
>rule? Guess who's laughing now.

Pence is an elected government official, though.

FPP

unread,
Oct 12, 2017, 6:24:31 PM10/12/17
to
On 10/12/17 2:26 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> Remember how the left mocked Mike Pence for his "no dining with women"
> rule? Guess who's laughing now.

Just a guess... but everybody who's not Mike Pence?

--
"If you can't drink their whiskey, screw their women, take their money,
and vote against 'em anyway, you don't belong in office." -Molly Ivins

hanc...@bbs.cpcn.com

unread,
Oct 13, 2017, 2:43:35 PM10/13/17
to
On Thursday, October 12, 2017 at 3:00:48 PM UTC-4, bruce2...@gmail.com wrote:

> Pence is an elected government official, though.

Let's not forget Pence's email abuses, for which he never had
to answer.


It was also reported that VP Pence used a private email to conduct
public business while governor. State Governors deal with national
security and confidential information regularly, such as security
alerts and federal investigations.

Indiana law requires that records related to state business be
retained and available in response to public records requests.
While emails on state accounts would be captured by state
computer servers, messages sent on a private account would be
hidden unless steps were taken to make them available.

article at
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/02/us/mike-pence-used-private-email-as-governor-news-report-says.html























Ubiquitous

unread,
Oct 16, 2017, 7:07:34 AM10/16/17
to
So what? It's still relevant to Weinstein.

Ubiquitous

unread,
Oct 16, 2017, 7:08:50 AM10/16/17
to
In article <oroq2s$ung$2...@dont-email.me>, fred...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 10/12/17 2:26 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:

>> Remember how the left mocked Mike Pence for his "no dining with women"
>> rule? Guess who's laughing now.
>
>Just a guess... but everybody who's not Mike Pence?

Well, there you go being obtuse when you lost the debate again...

bruce2...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 16, 2017, 8:08:15 AM10/16/17
to
web...@polaris.net, "Ubiquitous" wrote:
>In article <oroq2s$ung$2...@dont-email.me>, fred...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On 10/12/17 2:26 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
>
>>> Remember how the left mocked Mike Pence for his "no dining with women"
>>> rule? Guess who's laughing now.
>>
>>Just a guess... but everybody who's not Mike Pence?
>
>Well, there you go being obtuse when you lost the debate again

He didn't lose because what if Mike Pence is the president and Nancy Pelosi (D-Ca) is the House Speaker and Susan Collins R-Me) is the Senate Majority leader? Then president Pence couldn't secretly confer with congress over dinner.
(according to HIS own words)

FPP

unread,
Oct 16, 2017, 8:37:16 AM10/16/17
to
On 10/16/17 7:08 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> In article <oroq2s$ung$2...@dont-email.me>, fred...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 10/12/17 2:26 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:
>
>>> Remember how the left mocked Mike Pence for his "no dining with women"
>>> rule? Guess who's laughing now.
>>
>> Just a guess... but everybody who's not Mike Pence?
>
> Well, there you go being obtuse when you lost the debate again...
>
>

If you're having trouble keeping up and need some help, just ask...

--
"Take a Tic-Tac and grab 'em by the pussy is the closest thing to a plan
Donald Trump has described this entire election." -Samantha Bee

FPP

unread,
Oct 16, 2017, 8:38:57 AM10/16/17
to
Then he'd have to try not to look at their "dirty pillows" during dinner...

Ubiquitous

unread,
Oct 24, 2017, 10:31:22 AM10/24/17
to
On Tuesday, critic Nell Minow revealed a little-known story about former
Friends star David Schwimmer — a story that shows how classy Schwimmer is, and
how hypocritical the Leftists in the media are. Her story goes something like
this: Schwimmer was doing a press junket for his film Poynter. She was
supposed to interview Schwimmer in the bar of the hotel, but it was too loud,
so Schwimmer offered to do the interview in his room. According to Indy 100:

Perhaps realising that this might be an uncomfortable and
potentially dangerous situation for a woman, Schwimmer added
that he could guarantee that a third person would be present
in the room … Nell didn't feel threatened and declined Schwimmer's
offer but appreciated the star's sensitivity and consideration.

Yes, Schwimmer did the right thing. It was both smart and decent for him to
offer to have a third person present in order to minimize both the risk of
sexual harassment or suspicion of sexual harassment. And the press are
praising him for this perspicacity now that Harvey Weinstein’s predilections
have been made public.

Flash back to April.

Vice President Mike Pence found himself raked over the coals for the sin of
stating that he would not dine alone with a woman not his wife, or attend
functions at which drinking took place without his wife present. And so Robin
Abcarian of The Los Angeles Times wrote this:

If professional women and men cannot be alone together, women are
the ones who will pay a price. They will not have the kind of
mentoring that promotes workplace advancement. They will not develop
the same kinds of relationships with bosses that their male
colleagues do. They will lose out. “I believe this is gender
discrimination,” said Kim Elsesser, 52, a UCLA lecturer on gender
and psychology who founded a proprietary quantitative hedge fund at
Morgan Stanley after graduating from Vassar and MIT.

Here’s Olga Khazan at The Atlantic:

[W]hen men avoid professional relationships with women, even if
for noble reasons, it actually hurts women in the end.

Khazan quoted Elsesser, too, who pointed out that 75% of men in her study
worried about allegations of sexual harassment and “30% of participants had
co-workers question them about the true motives behind a cross-gender
friendship.” But Elsesser blithely stated, “the way to overcome that problem,
Elsesser said, is not to monastically order room service every night of your
business trip. Instead, it’s to normalize men and women interacting
professionally, in a non-sexual way.”

So, will we see the press turn on Schwimmer? After all, he would have invited
a man up to his room without a third party present. Why did he single out
Minow? Was he a Mike Pence-type sexist?

Or is it possible that men _ought_ to be more careful around and protective of
women? Is it possible that being a gentlemen means going out of your way to
ensure that women don’t feel threatened or cajoled? Is it possible that
Pence’s rule wasn’t just for his own protection, but for the comfort of female
employees generally?

The difference between the media’s treatment of Schwimmer and Pence tells you
everything you need to know about the double standard applied to religious
conservatives and secular Leftists. If they participate in _precisely the same
behavior_, religious conservatives do it because they’re supposedly sexist,
and secular Leftists do it because they’re supposedly glorious and caring.

bruce2...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 24, 2017, 10:48:55 AM10/24/17
to
Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>bruce2...@gmail.com wrote:
>>Ubiquitous wrote:
>
>>>Remember how the left mocked Mike Pence for his "no dining with women"
>>>rule? Guess who's laughing now.
>>
>>Pence is an elected government official, though.
>
>On Tuesday, critic Nell Minow revealed a little-known story about former
>Friends star David Schwimmer — a story that shows how classy Schwimmer is, and
>how hypocritical the Leftists in the media are. Her story goes something like
>this: Schwimmer was doing a press junket for his film Poynter. She was
>supposed to interview Schwimmer in the bar of the hotel, but it was too loud,
>so Schwimmer offered to do the interview in his room. According to Indy 100:
>
> Perhaps realising that this might be an uncomfortable >and
> potentially dangerous situation for a woman, >Schwimmer added
> that he could guarantee that a third person would be >present
> in the room … Nell didn't feel threatened and >declined Schwimmer's
> offer but appreciated the star's sensitivity and >consideration.
>
>Yes, Schwimmer did the right thing. It was both smart and decent for him to
>offer to have a third person present in order to minimize both the risk of
>sexual harassment or suspicion of sexual harassment. And the press are
>praising him for this perspicacity now that Harvey Weinstein’s predilections
>have been made public.
>
>Flash back to April.
>
>Vice President Mike Pence found himself raked over the coals for the sin of
>stating that he would not dine alone with a woman not his wife...

Trump Mocks Pence For Wanting 'To Hang' All Gays
New York Post - Oct 16, 2017
-- https://www.nypost.com/2017/10/16/trump-mocks-pence-for-wanting-to-hang-all-gay-people/amp/?espv=1

David Johnston

unread,
Oct 24, 2017, 12:42:57 PM10/24/17
to
<cough>bullshit<cough>. Here's the thing about Pence. His definition
of "alone" is "in a room with 40 other people". Had he said, "I don't
invite women to meet with me privately in hotel rooms." the only thing
that would have been remarked on is "Why did he even need to say that?".
Schwimmer was actually alone with that reporter. Pence was talking
about having a meal at a restaurant where you are never alone if only
because the wait staff are constantly there.


Obveeus

unread,
Oct 24, 2017, 1:10:43 PM10/24/17
to


On 10/24/2017 12:42 PM, David Johnston wrote:

> <cough>bullshit<cough>.  Here's the thing about Pence.  His definition
> of "alone" is "in a room with 40 other people".  Had he said, "I don't
> invite women to meet with me privately in hotel rooms." the only thing
> that would have been remarked on is "Why did he even need to say that?".
>  Schwimmer was actually alone with that reporter.  Pence was talking
> about having a meal at a restaurant where you are never alone if only
> because the wait staff are constantly there.

As an aside on Schwimmer's story: If I was a rich/famous guy, I'd
probably want the 3rd party in the room just to protect me from false
claims that I did something unprofessional. Sure, maybe Schwimmer was
just trying to make the woman feel safe, but maybe he was just trying to
let her know that nothing was going to happen and he was going to make
sure of it by arranging for there to be a witness to all interactions.
It goes both ways.

FPP

unread,
Oct 24, 2017, 7:07:22 PM10/24/17
to
On 10/24/17 5:29 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> The difference between the media’s treatment of Schwimmer and Pence tells you
> everything you need to know about the double standard applied to religious
> conservatives and secular Leftists.

Did Schwimmer have a Secret Service detail, too?

No? Then the comparison is pure bullshit. Schwimmer was protecting
himself, as much as the reporter.

--
"Tinkle, tinkle little Czar, Putin put you where you are." -George Takei

jgro...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 24, 2017, 7:51:34 PM10/24/17
to
On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 7:38:57 AM UTC-5, FPP wrote:

> Then he'd have to try not to look at their "dirty pillows" during dinner...

I guess Press Sec. Sarah was trying to tempt Bubbles Bilderberg with her alluring
neck line today at the briefing.

I suppose Muammar Gaddafi's pillows got soiled from the blowing sand when he slept outside in his tent.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/gallery/2009/sep/23/muammar-gaddafi-libya-united-nations

mog...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 25, 2017, 3:16:13 PM10/25/17
to
On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 7:51:34 PM UTC-4, jgro...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 7:38:57 AM UTC-5, FPP wrote:
>
> > Then he'd have to try not to look at their "dirty pillows" during dinner...
>
> I guess Press Sec. Sarah was trying to tempt Bubbles Bilderberg with her alluring
> neck line today at the briefing.

Well. Did old Sarah Huckabee Sanders try that, too?

trotsky

unread,
Oct 25, 2017, 6:57:10 PM10/25/17
to
I don't want to be mean but would it really be possible to tell her
breasts from her rolls of fat?

The Horny Goat

unread,
Oct 25, 2017, 7:48:14 PM10/25/17
to
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 13:10:38 -0400, Obveeus <Obv...@aol.com> wrote:

>As an aside on Schwimmer's story: If I was a rich/famous guy, I'd
>probably want the 3rd party in the room just to protect me from false
>claims that I did something unprofessional. Sure, maybe Schwimmer was
>just trying to make the woman feel safe, but maybe he was just trying to
>let her know that nothing was going to happen and he was going to make
>sure of it by arranging for there to be a witness to all interactions.
>It goes both ways.

Probably true. That said he doesn't have to tell her that when he can
tell her he's doing for HER safety.

That is definitely not my idea of "heinous". I'm pretty sure she knew
he wasn't inviting her to a "threesome".

Lesmond

unread,
Oct 26, 2017, 2:00:08 PM10/26/17
to
You need only to look in the mirror to figure it out.


--
Do not spray into eyes
I have sprayed you into my eyes


mog...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 26, 2017, 2:22:07 PM10/26/17
to
You see Thanatos when you look in the mirror.

Lesmond

unread,
Oct 26, 2017, 2:50:11 PM10/26/17
to
Actually he and I don't agree on very much. I'm sure he would confirm this.

jgro...@hotmail.com

unread,
Oct 27, 2017, 9:33:14 PM10/27/17
to
Post White House, we won't she her as a model on The Price is Right.

trotsky

unread,
Oct 31, 2017, 5:56:48 AM10/31/17
to
How the fuck would you know?

trotsky

unread,
Oct 31, 2017, 5:57:20 AM10/31/17
to
Is that why I keep peeing on mirrors?

trotsky

unread,
Oct 31, 2017, 5:58:05 AM10/31/17
to
She might sit in for one of the new cars though.

0 new messages