Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The largest mess-ups/mistakes in the WB history...

34 views
Skip to first unread message

tmc...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 16, 2013, 11:42:37 PM10/16/13
to
http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?t=318234

...before it shutdown.

1.) Popular, Maybe It's Me, Do Over, Greetings From Tucson and Run Of The House were not only discontinued in the wrong time, they were badly messed up in the middle of the series by those stupid despicable TV critics for no reason at all.

2.) Popular was discontinued when Brooke was hit by a car and the condition was never revealed at all.

3.) Maybe It's me was badly messed up and discontinued after Jerry appraised the good news in too in a hurry and erratically before Molly and Ben kissing situation and Becky stole Ben back away from Molly for a no reason at all. They were blaming for Rick messing up, but Jerry was the officially guilty person messing up Molly's prom night.

4.) Do Over had a story to improve the past corrections, but it should not have been discontinued in the wrong time.

5.) The 15-year-old David Tiant character in Greetings From Tucson was poorly made. Actor Pablo Santos, who played David, is a kid with strong 11-year-old personality and he wasn't ready to play that type of David character at all because that character too strong maturely made to match Pablo's immature personality. That is a big bad reason why Pablo had a very hard time to perfect his acting.

6.) Run Of The House has a strong title and it was of course violent. But it should not have been discontinued in the wrong time.

7.) After season 6 ended, both aunts characters were written out, but actress Beth Broderick, who played the eldest aunt Zelda, was badly turned down due to poor talent and was forced to never return to Sabrina Teenage Witch show in the wrong time. Caroline Rhea had strong talent and was never turned down, but she should have return to the series finale of Sabrina together with Beth Broderick at the same time. The Cole character in Sabrina season 7 should have been played by Bryan Kirkwood instead.

8.) Nikki and Off Centre should have transfer to FOX to be safe on their second season renewals.

9.) Simon Rex, who plays Jeff in What I Like About You, should not have left after season one because he and Wesley Johnathan, who plays Gary Thorpe, make a better perfect pair of comedy than the girl characters and actresses.

I'm glad the WB is officially shutdown after there too many bloody brawl fights on all WB comedies.

But in the future, they might reboot these shows in a private network:

Popular, Maybe It's Me, Do Over, Greetings From Tucson and Run Of The House.



Read more: http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?t=318234#ixzz2hwnFn99a

David Johnston

unread,
Oct 17, 2013, 12:31:07 AM10/17/13
to
I wonder what the native language of the person writing that was.

Dave

unread,
Oct 17, 2013, 2:25:43 AM10/17/13
to
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 21:31:07 -0700, David Johnston wrote:

> I wonder what the native language of the person writing that was.

It reads as if it may be a Google translation into English.

tmc...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 18, 2013, 1:28:35 AM10/18/13
to
http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showpost.php?p=4842807&postcount=3

Making Popular more like Dawson's Creek, as well as moving the show to Friday nights for the second season. The one night their audience is most likely out and not watching TV. The show became too dramatic, ratings declined, canceled with a "to be continued..." 2001

The head of the network defended canceling Everwood by showing 7th Heaven had better ratings. I don't blame 7th Heaven, like many Everwood fans do. There were other shows on that network at the time that could have gone before both Everwood and 7th Heaven. Everwood was canceled by The WB after four outstanding seasons. The show had tons of life left in it. 2006

Losing Buffy the Vampire Slayer (and Roswell) to UPN in 2001.

Canceling Roswell, Popular, Birds of Prey, Angel, Jack & Bobby, Reba.

The horrible influx of reality shows. Popstars, Jaimie Kennedy Experiment, High School Reunion, Beauty and the Geek, The Starlet, Survival of the Richest, The Surreal Life, etc.

Shows that The WB "screwed":
http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/ScrewedByTheNetwork/LiveActionTV

Angel was suddenly canned to the confusion of those making the show, as it was consistently high-quality with high ratings. The reason the network gave was even more confusing: the show was so popular and good that they wanted the series to end on a high note instead of letting it die in obscurity. Possibly the only example of a show being canceled (ostensibly) because everyone liked it too much.

Word of God says that the network wanted to wait until the end of the season to consider renewal. Joss demanded an answer at mid-season and Jamie Kellner canned it, seemingly out of spite.

Worse, Word of God was that this had happened for the last several seasons of the show. Joss finally snapped since the show was, as established, quite popular. For some reason, the network dropped the ball on what probably would've been the best season yet for fear of Joss actually gaining enough leverage to know if those scripts he'd been writing for next season were a waste of time or not.

The WB screwed over Birds of Prey by trying to turn it into Smallville:
WAY too much Helena/Reese, too little Barbara/Dinah.

The network ordered the pilot to be completely reshot just weeks before airtime (The original pilot, available as an extra on the DVD release, was deemed by the network to be "too dark".)

The show was moved from Toronto to Los Angeles, thereby putting a serious crimp in its budget.

MASSIVE Executive Meddling.

Perhaps most lethally, the show kept teasing every week that Batman would be returning to Gotham imminently (as in "in next week's episode")...and then he didn't, in arguably the most shameless example of Trailers Always Lie in the network's history. By midseason, virtually all the casual fans and even a majority of the more ardent fans were sick of being lied to every week, and quit watching.

End Result: Dead Show, Dead Network.

Jack And Bobby wasn't treated very favorably by the The WB — it was hardly advertised at all compared to most of the network's other shows, and after Winter break there was no advance warning of any new episodes airing, so unless you used an episode guide you'd never know the show was even still on. To be fair, it did get a much more significant amount of advertising towards the end of the season, but the damage was already done as the ratings were far too low for it to have a chance of renewal.

Further, Jack and Bobby wasn't exactly an easy show to sell based on marketing — the ads made it look like a typical WB teen drama, not even hinting at the story of Bobby being President in the future (being told through flashforwards). Those looking for a teen drama were caught off guard by the political storyline, while those who didn't mind the politics didn't watch because it didn't look too different from every other teen drama on the network. In the end, the show's unique premise was its undoing.

The WB was so quick to cancel Run of the House that it didn't even to get to finish its first and only season (the last few episodes were only ever aired overseas). It wasn't like the show's ratings were that bad, either, as it had What I Like About You as a lead-in.

Twins and Related were also victims of this. Really, The WB was almost as infamous as FOX for cancelling shows left and right...and now The CW seems to be following in they're footsteps, given how badly they screwed over Reba, the highest-rated show on The WB.


Read more: http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?t=318234#ixzz2i34L1Zgv

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Oct 18, 2013, 1:57:24 PM10/18/13
to
tmc...@gmail.com wrote:

>http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showthread.php?t=318234#ixzz2hwnFn99a

>http://www.sitcomsonline.com/boards/showpost.php?p=4842807&postcount=3

>Making Popular more like Dawson's Creek, as well as moving the show to
>Friday nights for the second season. The one night their audience is
>most likely out and not watching TV. The show became too dramatic,
>ratings declined, canceled with a "to be continued..." 2001

>The head of the network defended canceling Everwood by showing 7th
>Heaven had better ratings. I don't blame 7th Heaven, like many Everwood
>fans do. There were other shows on that network at the time that could
>have gone before both Everwood and 7th Heaven. Everwood was canceled by
>The WB after four outstanding seasons. The show had tons of life left in
>it. 2006

>Losing Buffy the Vampire Slayer (and Roswell) to UPN in 2001.

Oh, give me a break. UPN was desperate and bought the program at any cost.
The WB couldn't justify the absurdly high per-episode cost, which sure as
hell didn't all go to cast raises. It's not like buying the last few seasons
of Buffy saved UPN or would have saved The WB.

>Canceling Roswell, Popular, Birds of Prey, Angel, Jack & Bobby, Reba.

Don't agree. Roswell bored me. Birds of Prey was sabotaged. Jack & Bobby
was IRRITATING. Never watched Reba.

Angel? Had a decent final season, then went out with all of them fighting.
Even if it wasn't intended to be a series finale, it worked as a fantastic
ending. What's wrong with a series going out on a high note, rather than
everyone saying that they wished it had been cancelled several seasons ago
because later seasons were disappointing?

Dude: Angel had FIVE SEASONS. Yeah, the show never had a chance.

What was The WB show about the cast of a tv show that did the show within
a show? I caught just a few episodes of that, but I thought it was clever.
I don't think they aired all episodes.

>The horrible influx of reality shows. Popstars, Jaimie Kennedy
>Experiment, High School Reunion, Beauty and the Geek, The Starlet,
>Survival of the Richest, The Surreal Life, etc.

People gave High School Reunion good reviews. I didn't watch any of those.

>The WB screwed over Birds of Prey by trying to turn it into Smallville:
>WAY too much Helena/Reese, too little Barbara/Dinah.

>The network ordered the pilot to be completely reshot just weeks before
>airtime (The original pilot, available as an extra on the DVD release,
>was deemed by the network to be "too dark".)

>The show was moved from Toronto to Los Angeles, thereby putting a
>serious crimp in its budget.

Huh? How the fuck is that a network program executive's decision?

As always, I can never tell if I'm commenting on what you've written or
quotes from cited articles. As always, I refuse to read your cited articles
as I will not click through 7 pages to read a short article.

I wish you'd clarify your articles, especially making it clear that you're
commenting on the cited article and not excerpting quotes from it.

tmc...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 19, 2013, 3:04:06 AM10/19/13
to
Why don't you just register to SitcomsOnline.com and actually respond directly to what that person said in the thread instead of bitching to me!?

tmc...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 19, 2013, 3:08:10 AM10/19/13
to
On Friday, October 18, 2013 10:57:24 AM UTC-7, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
What the hell is your fucking problem Adam!? I think that based on the links that I provided directly above (and if you actually bothered or care to click on them if you got confused), that I'm taking what others have said from another message board discussion. This isn't simply another WhatCulture article!

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Oct 19, 2013, 11:42:50 AM10/19/13
to
So you quoted IN FULL my remarks, and said nothing about them, using that
horrific Google Groups style that inserts extraneous quoted blank lines
between lines of actual quotes.

If you DON'T want these shitty articles discussed on Usenet, WHAT THE
FUCK DO YOU THINK YOU'RE DOING BY POSTING THEM TO USENET?

If I wanted to participate on Web forums, I wouldn't read Usenet.

Damn, you're an unpleasant idiot.

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Oct 19, 2013, 11:45:28 AM10/19/13
to
So 100% of your shit is plagarized. None of the comments are yours. Got it.

I read and post to Usenet because I wish to followup directly to what an
author has posted. If you're NOT the author, stop posting improperly cited
material. If you DON'T want the shit you post discussed on Usenet but you
post to Usenet regardless, well, you know what you can do with your attitude.

tmc...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 19, 2013, 2:28:43 PM10/19/13
to
Why should whether or not I post 100% my own words or opinions (so I "plagiarized", sue me) be a major issue or "deal breaker" for you Adam? I find it ridiculous that you want or are insisting on my posting her a particular way as if you're officially laying out the rules! And quite frankly, you're the one who hand an "attitude" first by using the f-word and being overall antagonistic towards me (and bringing up my past immediate history of posts).

tmc...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 19, 2013, 2:30:12 PM10/19/13
to
Oh fuck you Adam! I've hated having to read your fucking responses from day one, because of your nitpicking and overall bitchiness.

tmc...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 19, 2013, 2:41:46 PM10/19/13
to
If you don't like what I have to post here Adam, then quite frankly nobody is forcing you to reply to them. And you want to call me an "unpleasant idiot", you the feeling is pretty much mutual at this point. It's not my fault, you can't totally understand the point that I'm trying to get across and you have to proceed to immediately become directly antagonistic towards me.
0 new messages