Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Rachel Maddow Says She Has Donald Trump's Tax Returns
64 views
Skip to first unread message
Ubiquitous
Mar 14, 2017, 8:10:49 PM3/14/17
to
The MSNBC host promised to share Trump's tax info on her show Tuesday
evening.
MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced on Twitter Tuesday afternoon that
she has gained access to President Donald Trump's tax returns.
Maddow promised to release the returns on her show on Tuesday evening
at 9 p.m. ET.
"BREAKING: We've got Trump tax returns," Maddow wrote.
Trump's tax returns have been a point of contention since he refused to
release them during the presidential race last November.
Maddow has recently been enjoying a massive ratings bump, outrating
every other primetime show last week. The host, who is open about her
left-leaning political inclinations, beat her direct right-wing
competition, Fox News' Tucker Carlson, by 14 percent in the targeted
news demo of 25-54 year old adults.
Maddow has been openly critical of President Trump during his first 100
days in office.
--
Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd
have to audit liberals & wire tap reporters' phones.
evening.
MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced on Twitter Tuesday afternoon that
she has gained access to President Donald Trump's tax returns.
Maddow promised to release the returns on her show on Tuesday evening
at 9 p.m. ET.
"BREAKING: We've got Trump tax returns," Maddow wrote.
Trump's tax returns have been a point of contention since he refused to
release them during the presidential race last November.
Maddow has recently been enjoying a massive ratings bump, outrating
every other primetime show last week. The host, who is open about her
left-leaning political inclinations, beat her direct right-wing
competition, Fox News' Tucker Carlson, by 14 percent in the targeted
news demo of 25-54 year old adults.
Maddow has been openly critical of President Trump during his first 100
days in office.
--
Dems & the media want Trump to be more like Obama, but then he'd
have to audit liberals & wire tap reporters' phones.
Adam H. Kerman
Mar 15, 2017, 12:36:19 AM3/15/17
to
Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
Fuck you, Ubi, for hiding the URL in your headers again:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/rachel-maddow-says-she-has-donald-trumps-tax-returns-will-reveal-tonight-986268
Also, Ubi's bullshit crosspost to a series of nonexistent newsgroups cut.
>The MSNBC host promised to share Trump's tax info on her show Tuesday
>evening.
>MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced on Twitter Tuesday afternoon that
>she has gained access to President Donald Trump's tax returns. . . .
She had the 1040 main form without the required schedules of a return from
12 years ago, so not even a single complete tax return. Someone running
an open documents Washington Web site provided it but didn't explain
how the hell he got it.
The Donald paid AMT; no surprise.
Fuck you, Ubi, for hiding the URL in your headers again:
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/rachel-maddow-says-she-has-donald-trumps-tax-returns-will-reveal-tonight-986268
Also, Ubi's bullshit crosspost to a series of nonexistent newsgroups cut.
>The MSNBC host promised to share Trump's tax info on her show Tuesday
>evening.
>MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced on Twitter Tuesday afternoon that
She had the 1040 main form without the required schedules of a return from
12 years ago, so not even a single complete tax return. Someone running
an open documents Washington Web site provided it but didn't explain
how the hell he got it.
The Donald paid AMT; no surprise.
Ubiquitous
Mar 15, 2017, 4:50:00 AM3/15/17
to
In article <oaag6l$iu$3...@dont-email.me>, a...@chinet.com wrote:
guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a business owned by
(*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS (but not the
government).
Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>The MSNBC host promised to share Trump's tax info on her show Tuesday
>>evening.
>>
>>MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced on Twitter Tuesday afternoon that
>>she has gained access to President Donald Trump's tax returns. . . .
>
>She had the 1040 main form without the required schedules of a return from
>12 years ago, so not even a single complete tax return. Someone running
>an open documents Washington Web site provided it but didn't explain
>how the hell he got it.
>
>The Donald paid AMT; no surprise.
Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely grinning
>>The MSNBC host promised to share Trump's tax info on her show Tuesday
>>evening.
>>
>>MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced on Twitter Tuesday afternoon that
>>she has gained access to President Donald Trump's tax returns. . . .
>
>She had the 1040 main form without the required schedules of a return from
>12 years ago, so not even a single complete tax return. Someone running
>an open documents Washington Web site provided it but didn't explain
>how the hell he got it.
>
>The Donald paid AMT; no surprise.
guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a business owned by
(*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS (but not the
government).
Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
Adam H. Kerman
Mar 15, 2017, 11:13:45 AM3/15/17
to
Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>a...@chinet.com wrote:
>>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>a...@chinet.com wrote:
>>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>Fuck you, Ubi, for hiding the URL in your headers again:
>>http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/rachel-maddow-says-she-has-donald-trumps-tax-returns-will-reveal-tonight-986268
>>Also, Ubi's bullshit crosspost to a series of nonexistent newsgroups cut.
I'm still cutting the bullshit crosspost, Ubi.
>>http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/rachel-maddow-says-she-has-donald-trumps-tax-returns-will-reveal-tonight-986268
>>Also, Ubi's bullshit crosspost to a series of nonexistent newsgroups cut.
>>>The MSNBC host promised to share Trump's tax info on her show Tuesday
>>>evening.
>>>MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced on Twitter Tuesday afternoon that
>>>she has gained access to President Donald Trump's tax returns. . . .
>>She had the 1040 main form without the required schedules of a return from
>>12 years ago, so not even a single complete tax return. Someone running
>>an open documents Washington Web site provided it but didn't explain
>>how the hell he got it.
>>The Donald paid AMT; no surprise.
>Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely grinning
>guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a business owned by
>(*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS (but not the
>government).
so those would be lies.
EGK
Mar 15, 2017, 11:31:02 AM3/15/17
to
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:10:51 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com>
wrote:
>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely grinning
>>guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a business owned by
>>(*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS (but not the
>>government).
>
>You can't tell any of that from the portion of the tax return they had,
>so those would be lies.
Liberals like Maddow call them "hypothetical truths". :)
>Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely grinning
>>guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a business owned by
>>(*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS (but not the
>>government).
>
>You can't tell any of that from the portion of the tax return they had,
>so those would be lies.
Ubiquitous
Mar 15, 2017, 2:34:50 PM3/15/17
to
FPP
Mar 15, 2017, 7:37:13 PM3/15/17
to
On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
that's what "over the transom" means.
Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
--
White House: "Don't call it Trumpcare." 3-8-17
"How bad does something have to be, that Donald Trump doesn't want to
put his name on it?" -SNL 3-11-17
FPP
Mar 15, 2017, 7:37:59 PM3/15/17
to
On 2017-03-15 12:33:47 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
> m...@privacy.net wrote:
>> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>>>> Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely
>>>> grinning guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a
>>>> business owned by (*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS
>>>> (but not the government).
>>>
>>> You can't tell any of that from the portion of the tax return they had,
>>> so those would be lies.
>>
>> Liberals like Maddow call them "hypothetical truths". :)
>
> We call it "Fake News".
Yes... "you" do. The rest of us just call it "news".
> m...@privacy.net wrote:
>> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>>>> Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely
>>>> grinning guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a
>>>> business owned by (*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS
>>>> (but not the government).
>>>
>>> You can't tell any of that from the portion of the tax return they had,
>>> so those would be lies.
>>
>> Liberals like Maddow call them "hypothetical truths". :)
>
> We call it "Fake News".
Wayne
Mar 15, 2017, 10:18:40 PM3/15/17
to
On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>
>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>
> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>
> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit... that's
> what "over the transom" means.
>
> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>
>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>
> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>
> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit... that's
> what "over the transom" means.
>
> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
Alex
Mar 16, 2017, 12:01:16 AM3/16/17
to
In article <oaag6l$iu$3...@dont-email.me>
So he (A Republican) paid and all the Obama (Democrat) czars,
criminals and cunts didn't, no surprise.
criminals and cunts didn't, no surprise.
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 2:16:38 AM3/16/17
to
He promised to release them. He should keep his word. For once.
Jeanne Douglas
Mar 16, 2017, 2:56:09 AM3/16/17
to
In article <c37fd46c4a2b19ab...@dizum.com>,
--
JD
"May your winter feast be an orgy of delight"
-- The Big Furry, Late Show with Stephen
Colbert
"Alex" <al...@cnn.com> wrote:
> In article <oaag6l$iu$3...@dont-email.me>
> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> >
> > Fuck you, Ubi, for hiding the URL in your headers again:
> >
> > http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/rachel-maddow-says-she-has-donald-trum
> > ps-tax-returns-will-reveal-tonight-986268
> >
> > Also, Ubi's bullshit crosspost to a series of nonexistent newsgroups cut.
> >
> > >The MSNBC host promised to share Trump's tax info on her show Tuesday
> > >evening.
> >
> > >MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced on Twitter Tuesday afternoon that
> > >she has gained access to President Donald Trump's tax returns. . . .
> >
> > She had the 1040 main form without the required schedules of a return from
> > 12 years ago, so not even a single complete tax return. Someone running
> > an open documents Washington Web site provided it but didn't explain
> > how the hell he got it.
> >
> > The Donald paid AMT; no surprise.
And he is planning to get rid of it so he'll only have to pay 4%.
> In article <oaag6l$iu$3...@dont-email.me>
> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> >
> > Fuck you, Ubi, for hiding the URL in your headers again:
> >
> > http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/rachel-maddow-says-she-has-donald-trum
> > ps-tax-returns-will-reveal-tonight-986268
> >
> > Also, Ubi's bullshit crosspost to a series of nonexistent newsgroups cut.
> >
> > >The MSNBC host promised to share Trump's tax info on her show Tuesday
> > >evening.
> >
> > >MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced on Twitter Tuesday afternoon that
> > >she has gained access to President Donald Trump's tax returns. . . .
> >
> > She had the 1040 main form without the required schedules of a return from
> > 12 years ago, so not even a single complete tax return. Someone running
> > an open documents Washington Web site provided it but didn't explain
> > how the hell he got it.
> >
> > The Donald paid AMT; no surprise.
--
JD
"May your winter feast be an orgy of delight"
-- The Big Furry, Late Show with Stephen
Colbert
TomB...@agent.com
Mar 16, 2017, 7:12:51 AM3/16/17
to
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:37:57 -0400, FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2017-03-15 12:33:47 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>
>> m...@privacy.net wrote:
>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely
>>>>> grinning guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a
>>>>> business owned by (*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS
>>>>> (but not the government).
>>>>
>>>> You can't tell any of that from the portion of the tax return they had,
>>>> so those would be lies.
>>>
>>> Liberals like Maddow call them "hypothetical truths". :)
>>
>> We call it "Fake News".
>
>Yes... "you" do. The rest of us just call it "news".
What of news worthy interest did you see in the return, Fred?
>On 2017-03-15 12:33:47 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>
>> m...@privacy.net wrote:
>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely
>>>>> grinning guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a
>>>>> business owned by (*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS
>>>>> (but not the government).
>>>>
>>>> You can't tell any of that from the portion of the tax return they had,
>>>> so those would be lies.
>>>
>>> Liberals like Maddow call them "hypothetical truths". :)
>>
>> We call it "Fake News".
>
>Yes... "you" do. The rest of us just call it "news".
Wayne
Mar 16, 2017, 2:18:52 PM3/16/17
to
On 3/15/2017 11:16 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>
>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>
>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>
>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>
>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit... that's
>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>
>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>
>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>
> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>
You also don't jump through every imaginable hoop your critics hold out.
> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>
>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>
>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>
>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>
>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit... that's
>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>
>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>
>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>
> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>
Everybody knows that Trump's tax returns are irrelevant. Anything
fishy, and the IRS would be all over this big fish's ass.
Opponents just want his tax return so they can dredge through and come
up with any kind of bullshit accusations.
In short, when somebody tells you "go get me a switch so I can beat you
with it", you don't have to do it. And if you do it, you bring back the
smallest switch possible.
trotsky
Mar 16, 2017, 2:56:54 PM3/16/17
to
On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>
>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>
>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>
>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>
>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit... that's
>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>
>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>
>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>
> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
"Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>
>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>
>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>
>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>
>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit... that's
>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>
>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>
>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>
> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
trotsky
Mar 16, 2017, 3:08:42 PM3/16/17
to
Wayne
Mar 16, 2017, 4:57:28 PM3/16/17
to
criticize Trump. Anything will do.
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 5:47:01 PM3/16/17
to
> In article <oaag6l$iu$3...@dont-email.me>, a...@chinet.com wrote:
>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>>> The MSNBC host promised to share Trump's tax info on her show Tuesday
>>> evening.
>>>
>>> MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced on Twitter Tuesday afternoon that
>>> she has gained access to President Donald Trump's tax returns. . . .
>>
>> She had the 1040 main form without the required schedules of a return from
>> 12 years ago, so not even a single complete tax return. Someone running
>> an open documents Washington Web site provided it but didn't explain
>> how the hell he got it.
>>
>> The Donald paid AMT; no surprise.
>
> Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely grinning
> guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a business owned by
> (*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS (but not the
> government).
>
> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
That's the second time you've made that moronic claim.
>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
>>> The MSNBC host promised to share Trump's tax info on her show Tuesday
>>> evening.
>>>
>>> MSNBC host Rachel Maddow announced on Twitter Tuesday afternoon that
>>> she has gained access to President Donald Trump's tax returns. . . .
>>
>> She had the 1040 main form without the required schedules of a return from
>> 12 years ago, so not even a single complete tax return. Someone running
>> an open documents Washington Web site provided it but didn't explain
>> how the hell he got it.
>>
>> The Donald paid AMT; no surprise.
>
> Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely grinning
> guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a business owned by
> (*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS (but not the
> government).
>
> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next? I'm
> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
The first time I pointed out where it is absolutely NOT illegal to
recieve (sic) Trump's tax forms.
Now you're just doubling down on the stupid.
Get it through your thick head... nothing illegal here, as long as it
was gotten over the transom.
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 6:19:58 PM3/16/17
to
charitable giving.
Up until now, we've known literally nothing... and this is just a
sliver of information, all of it good for Trump.
Personally, I'd say he either leaked it himself, or had it leaked.
Either way, when you get something you've never had before, it's news,
by definition. Worthy? Sure. Revealing? That's debatable.
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 6:24:02 PM3/16/17
to
a hoop... it's the norm.
Hillary released everything going back to the 70's... so don't cry for
Trump. It's the least he could do.
It's what he PROMISED to do, for fuck's sake!
As far as irrelevant - that's pure bullshit. It's actually the MOST
relevant thing he could do. It would tell us if he's breaking the law,
and in violation of the Constitution.
How is that not relevant?
You pricks wanted Obama's birth certificate years after he'd already
produced it, and it had been certified by the State of Hawaii. Now,
THAT'S a hoop!
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 6:24:47 PM3/16/17
to
and almost 100% of what he has done is lie and fuckup.
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 6:25:44 PM3/16/17
to
Everybody, that's who.
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 6:26:13 PM3/16/17
to
Still waiting for the proof of that.
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 6:26:43 PM3/16/17
to
Except for almost everybody else.
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 6:27:17 PM3/16/17
to
No proof, and nobody else saw it.
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 6:28:00 PM3/16/17
to
Except for Obama 4 and 8 years ago.
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 6:28:46 PM3/16/17
to
Except any number of courts have struck it down as a muslim ban.
Ditto his "revised' muslim ban.
DoD
Mar 16, 2017, 7:33:03 PM3/16/17
to
"FPP" <fred...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:oaf3df$s65$4...@dont-email.me...
> On 2017-03-16 16:57:26 -0400, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>
>> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>>> that's
>>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>>
>>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>>
>> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
>> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
>
> My muslim ban is not a muslim ban.
>
> Except any number of courts have struck it down as a muslim ban.
>
> Ditto his "revised' muslim ban.
And Fred still sucks collie dick.
>
>> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>>> that's
>>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>>
>>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>>
>> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
>> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
>
> My muslim ban is not a muslim ban.
>
> Except any number of courts have struck it down as a muslim ban.
>
> Ditto his "revised' muslim ban.
Ubiquitous
Mar 16, 2017, 8:08:31 PM3/16/17
to
In article <oacj39$cqt$2...@dont-email.me>, fred...@gmail.com wrote:
>On 2017-03-15 12:33:47 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>> m...@privacy.net wrote:
>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>> Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely
>>>>> grinning guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a
>>>>> business owned by (*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with
RUSSIANS
>>>>> (but not the government).
>>>>
>>>> You can't tell any of that from the portion of the tax return they had,
>>>> so those would be lies.
>>>
>>> Liberals like Maddow call them "hypothetical truths". :)
>>
>> We call it "Fake News".
>
>Yes... "you" do. The rest of us just call it "news".
Well, there go your selective reading comprehension problems whenever you've
>On 2017-03-15 12:33:47 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>> m...@privacy.net wrote:
>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>> Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely
>>>>> grinning guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a
>>>>> business owned by (*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with
RUSSIANS
>>>>> (but not the government).
>>>>
>>>> You can't tell any of that from the portion of the tax return they had,
>>>> so those would be lies.
>>>
>>> Liberals like Maddow call them "hypothetical truths". :)
>>
>> We call it "Fake News".
>
>Yes... "you" do. The rest of us just call it "news".
lost a debate again!
bruce2...@gmail.com
Mar 16, 2017, 8:16:04 PM3/16/17
to
On 2017-03-16 16:57:26 -0400, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote:
> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>
>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>
>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>> that's
>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>
>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>
>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>
> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
So in closing, A N Y criticism of Trump will do.
> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>
>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>
>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>> that's
>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>
>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>
>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>
> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
Wayne
Mar 16, 2017, 9:45:10 PM3/16/17
to
On 3/16/2017 3:28 PM, FPP wrote:
> On 2017-03-16 16:57:26 -0400, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>
>> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>>> that's
>>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>>
>>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>>
>> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
>> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
>
> My muslim ban is not a muslim ban.
>
> Except any number of courts have struck it down as a muslim ban.
>
> Ditto his "revised' muslim ban.
Let me summarize instead of attempting to reply to your barrage of drivel.
> On 2017-03-16 16:57:26 -0400, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>
>> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>>> that's
>>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>>
>>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>>
>> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
>> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
>
> My muslim ban is not a muslim ban.
>
> Except any number of courts have struck it down as a muslim ban.
>
> Ditto his "revised' muslim ban.
None of your rants make any reason for Trump to release tax returns.
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 10:56:28 PM3/16/17
to
FPP
Mar 16, 2017, 10:57:11 PM3/16/17
to
DoD
Mar 16, 2017, 11:09:08 PM3/16/17
to
news:oafj3d$2lt$1...@dont-email.me...
You have me confused with a liberal.
FPP
Mar 17, 2017, 6:07:47 AM3/17/17
to
NoBody
Mar 17, 2017, 10:33:10 AM3/17/17
to
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 18:28:44 -0400, FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2017-03-16 16:57:26 -0400, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>
>> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>>> that's
>>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>>
>>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>>
>> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
>> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
>
>My muslim ban is not a muslim ban.
>
>Except any number of courts have struck it down as a muslim ban.
>
By using judicial overreach. Courts are supposed to rule on text of
>On 2017-03-16 16:57:26 -0400, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>
>> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>>> that's
>>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>>
>>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>>
>> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
>> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
>
>My muslim ban is not a muslim ban.
>
>Except any number of courts have struck it down as a muslim ban.
>
laws, not what someone said during an election campaign.
>Ditto his "revised' muslim ban.
NoBody
Mar 17, 2017, 10:33:37 AM3/17/17
to
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 18:27:58 -0400, FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2017-03-16 16:57:26 -0400, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>
>> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>>> that's
>>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>>
>>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>>
>> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
>> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
>
>Largest inaugural crown in history. Period.
I don't recall Trump wearing a crown?
>On 2017-03-16 16:57:26 -0400, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>
>> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>>> that's
>>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>>
>>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>>
>>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>>
>> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
>> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
>
>Largest inaugural crown in history. Period.
Wayne
Mar 17, 2017, 12:59:28 PM3/17/17
to
they can shop around for the outcome they want. Hawaii and Maryland are
no surprise.
TomB...@agent.com
Mar 17, 2017, 5:52:50 PM3/17/17
to
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017 18:19:55 -0400, FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2017-03-16 07:12:48 -0400, TomB...@agent.com said:
>
>> On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:37:57 -0400, FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-03-15 12:33:47 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>
>>>> m...@privacy.net wrote:
>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely
>>>>>>> grinning guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a
>>>>>>> business owned by (*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS
>>>>>>> (but not the government).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can't tell any of that from the portion of the tax return they had,
>>>>>> so those would be lies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Liberals like Maddow call them "hypothetical truths". :)
>>>>
>>>> We call it "Fake News".
>>>
>>> Yes... "you" do. The rest of us just call it "news".
>>
>>
>> What of news worthy interest did you see in the return, Fred?
>
>That he actually made quite a bit of money. That he actually did some
>charitable giving.
>
>Up until now, we've known literally nothing... and this is just a
>sliver of information, all of it good for Trump.
>Personally, I'd say he either leaked it himself, or had it leaked.
>
>Either way, when you get something you've never had before, it's news,
>by definition. Worthy? Sure. Revealing? That's debatable.
I supposed, but over-hyped, I think.
>On 2017-03-16 07:12:48 -0400, TomB...@agent.com said:
>
>> On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:37:57 -0400, FPP <fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-03-15 12:33:47 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>
>>>> m...@privacy.net wrote:
>>>>> "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I monitored it for a bit. The only thing she and her insanely
>>>>>>> grinning guest could come up with was that Trump got a loan from a
>>>>>>> business owned by (*gasp*) THE CHINESE and did some business with RUSSIANS
>>>>>>> (but not the government).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can't tell any of that from the portion of the tax return they had,
>>>>>> so those would be lies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Liberals like Maddow call them "hypothetical truths". :)
>>>>
>>>> We call it "Fake News".
>>>
>>> Yes... "you" do. The rest of us just call it "news".
>>
>>
>> What of news worthy interest did you see in the return, Fred?
>
>That he actually made quite a bit of money. That he actually did some
>charitable giving.
>
>Up until now, we've known literally nothing... and this is just a
>sliver of information, all of it good for Trump.
>Personally, I'd say he either leaked it himself, or had it leaked.
>
>Either way, when you get something you've never had before, it's news,
>by definition. Worthy? Sure. Revealing? That's debatable.
FPP
Mar 17, 2017, 6:30:33 PM3/17/17
to
They announced it less than an hour before it aired... so it WASN'T
HYPED AT ALL.
> hype verb
> promote or publicize (a product or idea) intensively, often
> exaggerating its importance or benefits.
Nobody ever said it was going to be important, or revelatory - and if
that's what the public thought, well, that's on them.
If they read a lot more into it than was promised - (NOTHING was
promised except that they had a look at his tax returns) - then that's
their problem for getting their hopes up.
It wasn't much of anything... but over-hyped, it definitely was not.
moviePig
Mar 17, 2017, 6:33:48 PM3/17/17
to
Trump's tax returns", I agree. I still like her, but that was tacky.
--
- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com
DoD
Mar 17, 2017, 10:33:02 PM3/17/17
to
news:oagcc4$54h$2...@dont-email.me...
I don't nym shift, dummy.
FPP
Mar 17, 2017, 11:43:31 PM3/17/17
to
And I won't fault her for pluralizing tax returns... everybody does
that. If you want to quibble, they should be called tax Filings.
FPP
Mar 18, 2017, 3:06:00 AM3/18/17
to
You have my sympathies. I give them freely to everybody who is unwell.
trotsky
Mar 18, 2017, 7:43:26 AM3/18/17
to
http://www.mediaite.com/online/maddow-trumps-2005-tax-return-had-to-be-sterling-so-melania-could-get-her-citizenship/
trotsky
Mar 18, 2017, 7:44:21 AM3/18/17
to
are right.
trotsky
Mar 18, 2017, 7:45:42 AM3/18/17
to
fairly, though.
trotsky
Mar 18, 2017, 7:48:32 AM3/18/17
to
On 3/16/17 3:57 PM, Wayne wrote:
> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>
>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>
>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>> that's
>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>
>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>
>>
>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>
> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
That's weird, Wayne, because I find right wing assholes desperate to
> On 3/16/2017 11:56 AM, trotsky wrote:
>> On 3/16/17 1:16 AM, FPP wrote:
>>> On 2017-03-16 02:18:37 +0000, Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> said:
>>>
>>>> On 3/15/2017 4:37 PM, FPP wrote:
>>>>> On 2017-03-15 05:47:37 -0400, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe she can do an expose from the inside of a female prison next?
>>>>>> I'm
>>>>>> pretty sure it's illegal to have or recieve IRS tax forms.
>>>>>
>>>>> Than you'd be a moron... which - SURPISE- you are!
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing illegal about publishing a tax form you didn't solicit...
>>>>> that's
>>>>> what "over the transom" means.
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely 100% legal, under the 1st Amendment.
>>>>
>>>> A bigger question is who gives a shit about Trump's tax returns?
>>>
>>> You don't hide something if you don't have anything to hide.
>>
>>
>> "Wayne" can't understand such cryptic statements.
>>
> I understand it perfectly. FPP is looking for anything he can find to
> criticize Trump. Anything will do.
criticize Maddow, as well as other women such as Pelosi, Hillary, and
Wasserman Schultz. Over and over and over and over, they show an
irrational hatred of women. Everyone knows Trump's a moron, while
Maddow has a PhD. But the best the right wing can say about her is call
her "Rachel Madcow" Even a five year old would eschew something that
stupid. Your thoughts?
FPP
Mar 18, 2017, 1:46:50 PM3/18/17
to
and doesn't care what the ass clowns think of her.
When asked recently who should play her on TV, she said "Kirk Cameron".
0 new messages