>>A Friend wrote:
>>>Ubiquitous <
web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>Does anyone know why Diana Rigg left the show when she was so much of
>>>>a hit? Does anyone know why from any interviews that she gave?
>>>There's a decent summary here:
>>>
http://theavengers.tv/forever/peel2-prod.htm
>>>Basically, the work was too hard and they weren't paying her much --
>>>only lb 150 per episode (which was less than the cameraman got), bumped
>>>to lb 450 when she agreed to do a second series.
>>>BTW Rigg hated the leather catsuit. She may be the only person who has
>>>ever said that.
>>Hehehe
>>In the lesser colour season, she wore those colourful jumpsuits. I
>>always imagined lowering the front zipper slowly.
>The "Emma Peeler" - no, really, that's what they were called.
Clearly, I'm not the only one who thought long and hard about the zipper.
>>I didn't know that production was shut down before production of the
>>colour season was completed, and had to be resumed later. That
>>explains a few things.
>Such as?
The production was bleeding cash, shutting down after 16
episodes. They were still obliged to deliver 24 episodes for series 5.
That must have crystalized in Diana Rigg's mind that she wasn't going
to build her career by staying with this production.
It was just more chaos in addition to the change in show runners, then
firing the brand-new show runner in the midst of production on his
third episode and never completing the episode intended to be used
to introduce Tara King.
I absolutely cannot fault her, and I can't imagine that if she'd stayed
with the production that the scripts would have been better. They
changed the show.
I'm not disagreeing with eliminating the goofball science fiction elements
after series 5, however, just that I can't see that if she'd stayed, she'd
have gotten the better scripts on par with series 4.
>>She'd also been hired to do a James Bond movie and The Assasination
>>Bureau, an ok movie but the humour wasn't subtle in any way, so her
>>career was only getting bigger. Then she'd do a cheesy but fun
>>Vincent Price movie. (He had the temerity to rewrite Shakespeare?)
>>Then she'd return to television in a self-titled sitcom for NBC
>>in 1973 I've never seen, but it always sounded like a weak combination
>>of That Girl and Mary Tyler Moore, produced by Leonard Stern's company.
>That's a good description of it. It was really lousy.
I wonder what movies she'd turned down in 1972 or 1973 to make this.