On 07/07/2016 22:54, The Last Doctor wrote:
> Agamemnon <agam...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>> On 07/07/2016 19:17, The Last Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> But your view on your companions' reasoning doesn't ring true.
>>> The young, multicultural British DO very much think in terms you
>>> think of as "PC" and they think of as "natural".
>>
>> That's a load of nonsense. According to statistics the most racist,
>> insular and prejudiced people in Britain are those from the Middle
>> East and the second most racist are those from Asia. That is a
>> FACT! The least racist people are those from Europe and other
>> western democracies.
>
> Apart from those of Greek descent, apparently.
Stop making up fake statements which are deliberately racist.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325502/Map-shows-worlds-racist-countries-answers-surprise-you.html
THE LEAST RACIALLY TOLERANT COUNTRIES
40% + (of individuals surveyed would not want a person of another race
as a neighbour)
India, Jordan
30 - 39.9%
Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Vietnam, Indonesia, South Korea
20 - 39.9%
France, Turkey, Bulgaria, Algeria, Morocco, Mali, Zambia, Thailand,
Malaysia, The Philippines, Bangladesh, Hong Kong
THE MOST TOLERANT COUNTRIES
0 to 4.9%
United States, Canada, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Guatemala, Britain,
Sweden, Norway, Latvia, Australia, New Zealand
5 - 9.9%
Chile, Peru, Mexico, Spain, Germany, Belgium, Belarus, Croatia, Japan,
Pakistan, South Africa
10 - 14.9%Finland, Poland, Ukraine, Italy, Greece, Czech Republic, Slovakia
15 - 19.9% Venezuela, Hungary, Serbia, Romania, FYR Macedonia, Ethiopia,
Uganda, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Russia, China
Source: World Values Survey
>
> Whose statistics? What studies, by what institution? Putting the word
> FACT in capitals doesn't make something true. Nor does it make it a
> lie - but you're just claiming Truth without quoting a source, so
> it's impossible to judge how credible your beliefs are.
World Values Survey
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325502/Map-shows-worlds-racist-countries-answers-surprise-you.html
>
>> The PC loonies don't like this fact so they try to silence people
>> who speak out the truth
>
> You sound like Britain First, UKIP, Marine Le Pen, Nikolaos
> Michaloliakos and their ilk. Calling people you disagree with
> "loonies" and speaking out the "truth". Did you get a vote in the
> referendum?
I voted Remain. Some people in North London voted Leave because they
said there were too many Somalis living there and they're not even
Europeans. Thanks to the PC loonies the likes of UKIP, Marine Le Pen,
Nikolaos Michaloliakos and their ilk were allowed to win.
>
> and people have now had enough of it and it largely
>> contributed to the result of the Brexit referendum.
>>
>>> As I said before, it feels like you're pushing an anti-"PC"
>>> agenda and these aren't the characters to do it with. Your
>>> recidivist, anti Muslim views aren't the rap views and opinions
>>> of today's British youth.
>>
>> Wrong. There is nothing anti-Muslim in anything I wrote since
>> everything was based on historical facts which are even written and
>> condoned in they Koran itself including hostage taking and selling
>> women as sex salves.
>>
>
> Slavery is condoned in the Bible too. Do you know how absurd it is to
> claim not to be anti Islamic while using the Koran as an excuse for
> your fantasies?
Who is using the Bible today to condone slavery? No one. Where does the
Bible condone hostage taking and holding rich merchants for ransom while
killing the ones whose families can't afford to pay the ransom and
selling the women as sex slaves, practices which are all condoned in the
Koran and practices by Islamic State?
Unlike you I've actually read the Koran and tell it like it is. It reads
like parts of the Iliad where exactly the same practices of taking
hostages for ransom and distributing women as sex salves were carried
out 2000 years earlier and both books were probably major influences for
Edgar Rice Burroughs' Martian societies in his Barsoom series.
>
>> These practices and other practices demeaning to women are being
>> carried out to this day by ISIS using the Koran as justification.
>
> Da'esh is not all of Islam. By demonising them and focusing on their
> religion instead of just condemning them as murderous gangsters, you
> are pandering to their insidious methods of radicalisation.
I've said nothing about their religion in any of my stories. It is a
fact that the same crimes against humanity carried out by ISIS were also
carried out by the Ottomans against their Christian subjects including
mass executions of priests, burning down of churches and entire villages
and their populations to death, the whole sale massacre of populations
of entire islands in the tens to hundreds of thousands, and death
marchers, the selling of captive women as sex slaves, mass torture and
mass genocide all because of their religion. Those are the realities.
The Turks' burning of the Greek city of Smyrna and the massacre of it's
Christian population by driving those who didn't burn into the sea was
identical to the ending of Edgar Rice Burroughs' The Moon Maid (that is
book 1 of the series) which was publish after that event.
>
>> Like it or not the views of British youth and American youth
>> coincide more closely to those of Donald Trump
>
> Ah. So 75% of British under 25s voted to stay IN Europe and support
> multiculturalism because of their racism, while the vast majority of
> elderly and much more white people voted OUT because of their
> greater tolerance and support of immigrants. Thanks for explaining,
> for some reason I assumed those voting patterns meant the opposite
> was truer.
British youth realised that the threat wasn't from Europeans but from
migrants from places like Syria. In that respect they agree with Donald
Trump.
Unless people and the leaders of these intolerant countries from the
Middle East and Asia are named and shamed and made aware of their
intolerance and disrespect for other peoples and their history of abuse
and crimes against humanity then they will never cease and they will
keep on denying.
The PC loonies are nothing more than apologists for war criminals,
genocide deniers, religious fundamentalists and racists.
>
> than those of the PC loonies who
>> want to pretend everything is all sweetness and light and brush
>> everything contrary to their intolerant and revisionist views under
>> the carpet.
>
> Intolerant. You keep using this word. I do not think it means what
> you think it means.
>
> Not to mention, I have no idea how Muslim Muhammad Ali was. He was
> the Ottoman governor and declared a Khedivate - but he was an
> Albanian iirc, not even a Turk.
Muhammad Ali was a Muslim, fact, which has absolutely nothing to do with
my plot in any case, end of story.
Only Muslims were allowed to hold positions of power in the Ottoman
Empire. Christians were treated as second class citizens.
>
>>>>> The coincidence of Alis that allows the setup to develop is a
>>>>> bit of a stretch, but fair enough: however the period of
>>>>> history you've chosen to use is very insignificant so all the
>>>>> detail feels rather dull - this story might be better
>>>>> developed for a single episode with much of this cut out.
>>>>> Provided you can think of a more credible set up.
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking the exact opposite. There's enough material for
>>>> at least a 5 episode mini-series in this, which could be
>>>> stretched even further still in the same manner as The
>>>> Musketeers.
>>>
>>> In a sense, I agree. There is an excellent historical series to
>>> be made from the rich strata of Mediterranean and Middle Eastern
>>> history in Georgian and Victorian times. But that's not what
>>> Doctor Who is about, so it's a bad fit.
>>
>> It was exactly what Doctor Who was all about in the time of the
>> First Doctor. Doctor Who was created to educate people about
>> history though the Doctor taking part in historical events. One of
>> the models I used for this story was the First Doctor story The
>> Crusade.
>
> Which, if it had been written for today's TV audience, would have
> been over in 45 minutes. I have no objection to historicals. I wish
> modern Dr Who would do some. But to devote several episodes to one
> piece of obscure history as you seem to want to, is not the way Dr
> Who should go in my opinion.
I disagree. I think that purely historical episodes should be brought
back and that's why I decided to have a go a writing one.
The fact that you keep wrongly claiming that this history is obscure is
one of the best reasons for making it the subject of a Doctor Who
adventure. It could have also been done as part of The Indiana Jones
Chronicles series, another of my influences, but that all occurs 100
years later.
>
> Also I have
>> written Series 11 as an allegory to Islamic State terrorism and the
>> undemocratic nature of the European Union which I have tried to
>> depict in the style of Edgar Rice Burroughs' Barsoom series.
>
> Well you have failed in the last aim, though in banging on endlessly
> about iIslamic terrorism and your loathing of Europe, you have been
> 1000% successful. Far too much thinly veiled allegory, far too little
> SF, is my view on what these storylines represent.
>
> Change the record, Ag. This one's scratched.
>
Moffat tried to cover the same issues in his Zygon two parter and Face
the Raven, but his stories were filled with the same PC lunacy that
caused the problems he was depicting to occur in the first place. I have
dealt with the issues and come up with better solutions.
I've still not finished with the European Union yet. There's enough
material for another story but I'm waiting to see how things turn out
for the moment.
As for far too little science fiction, that is a good thing. People
don't want to watch discussions about the laws of physics or how
technology works. I've leaned towards action, adventure and romance
which is what all good stories have in common.
>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The coda is pointless, sorry. Its advertising, no one really
>>>>> wants to know about the George Foreman grill, and in any case
>>>>> as a mains powered electrical appliance, who'd take it to a
>>>>> barbecue?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They've taken a car battery powered mains inverter with them
>>>> and there are generators available at the site also, just like
>>>> there are at a county festival.
>>>>
>>> The punters don't carry much of that sort of stuff, even today
>>> in Glastonbury. Car batteries are heavy and full of acid - not a
>>> fun thing to take to a boxing match!
>>
>> It comes with you in your car engine compartment. You open it up
>> and connect crocodile cables to it or you take a generator with you
>> to power your PA system or anything else.
>>
>
> The Doctor and his companions took their car to the boxing match? And
> a PA system?
No. Other people took cars there and there were power points at camping
sites outside the arena.
>
>> The whole idea was to give the impression that the Doctor gave
>> George Foreman the original idea for naming a gill after himself.
>>
>
> Yawn.
>
Suit yourself.