I generally think the Albatross's curves make it better looking than the Bosco. I find both appealing. Non-Bosco Bullmoose wins hands down in looks, imho.
I'll be an Early Adopter of the Bosco if I can. I intend to post of my experience with it as soon as I have some. Actually, I'm going to have two virtually identical bikes set up (60cm Hillbornes); one 56cm Albatross and one 58cm Bosco. I'll post a comparison.
Yours,
Thomas Lynn Skean
who gets his cycling variety from cockpits not frames
Bosco is wider. Seems more open. Seems somewhat more flexy. Accommodates BarSack rack more easily. Extra rise is noticeable. Vast open space up front for stretching out.
Albatross feels stiffer. 2 or 3cm narrower is noticeable. Has less space for stretching out but the grip is more comfortable when I do it; the curves are great.
I have my Albatross on a nearly max'd out Tallux 10cm. I'm tonight mounting my Bosco on a 12cm Tallux (which won't be near max'd out); the Bosco came back towards me more.
Both my Alba and Bosco are HT Al and on otherwise virtually identical Hillbornes. I can't imagine the Bosco-moose will be even slightly flexy. Personally, liking my bars high like I do, I woiuldn't enjoy the Bosco-moose as much as the Alba. But I like my Bosco and my Albatross bars both very well indeed. Bosco feels more expansive. Alba gets edge on comfort and, frankly, beauty. Slight edge. And the Bosco's look is growing on me.
Yours,
Thomas Lynn Skean