Thanks, Ayende. I assumed it was intentional, I just wasn't sure how
I'm going to work around it. When I'm querying or loading the document
back out of RavenDB and it's mapping to a instance of my User object,
I need to then populate the aforementioned UserID field with the ID of
the document. I'm hoping that since FindIdentityProperty was set to
that RavenDB knows the UserID property is in indeed my "identity" that
it would map this for me, but I was running into issues with that
field being defaulted in my tests.
Admittedly I hadn't had a chance to really dig, it's possible I was
doing something wrong. I'm a bit rusty with my .NET in general and
LINQ may as well foregin language to me. I'll have a go later this
evening and post back when I'm convinced I can't figure it out on my
own.
Great work on this, btw. I'm enjoying it thus far. :)
On May 20, 11:23 am, Ayende Rahien <
aye...@ayende.com> wrote:
> That is intentional, the ID isn't stored with the document, it is _about_
> the document.
>
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Wesley Johnson
> <
johnson.wesle...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -