[rael-science] Critic refuses to quit Vatican sex abuse commission
12 views
Skip to first unread message
selected by Rael
unread,
Feb 8, 2016, 2:51:36 AM2/8/16
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to rael-s...@googlegroups.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Get Rael-Science on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/raelscience
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Critic refuses to
quit Vatican sex abuse commission
An
outspoken British member of a Roman Catholic commission on
sexual abuse has refused to quit, saying his treatment by the
Vatican is "outrageous".
Peter Saunders, who as a child was abused
by priests, said he would stay and only discuss his position
with the Pope - the man who appointed him.
The commission earlier voted for Mr
Saunders to "take a leave of absence", saying he was difficult
to work with.
Mr Saunders has been highly critical of the
commission, set up in 2014.
'Disgrace'
Responding to a Vatican statement about his
leave of absence, Mr Saunders was quoted by Reuters as saying in
Rome: "I was never told in advance of any such statement.
"I find it outrageous that I was not told,
much less that the statement occurred before I had had any time
to reflect on what I might do next.
"I have not left and I'm not leaving my
position on the commission. I was appointed by His Holiness Pope
Francis and I will only talk to him about my position."
He added: "For me, as a survivor, the
commission is a disgrace... They believe that child abuse is
behind us, but it is in no way behind us."
The papal commission earlier passed a
no-confidence vote against Mr Saunders, saying he was a
"campaigner" and talked too much to the media.
One commission member - speaking on
condition of anonymity - told Reuters news agency that the panel
was "deeply committed to the protection of children".
But the member added that the panel's brief
was to advise - not investigate or judge.
The commission - made of 17 members - was
established to help Pope Francis establish "best practices" to
tackle a series of sex abuse cases that have hit the Roman
Catholic Church around the world.
The Vatican has been accused of "systematically" adopting
policies allowing priests to sexually abuse thousands of
children.
Pope Francis has said that dealing with the
issue is vital for the Church's credibility, and that "sanctions" must be imposed
against perpetrators.
WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their
intelligence at its full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL"
on some articles does not mean that I agree with their content
or support it. "Selected by RAEL" means that I believe it is
important for the people of this planet to know about what
people think or do, even when what they think or do is
completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected
articles in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in
America praying for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was
stupid enough to believe that I was supporting praying to change
the weather. So, when I select articles which are in favor of
drugs, anti-semitic, anti-Jewish, racist, revisionist, or
inciting hatred against any group or religion, or any other
stupid article, it does not mean that I support them. It just
means that it is important for all human beings to know about
them. Common sense, which is usually very good among our
readers, is good enough to understand that. When, like in the
recent articles on drug decriminalization, it is necessary to
make it clearer, I add a comment, which in this case was very
clear: I support decriminalizing all drugs, as it is stupid to
throw depressed and sad people (as only depressed and sad people
use drugs) in prison and ruin their life with a criminal record.
That does not mean that there is any change to the Message which
says clearly that we must not use any drug except for medical
purposes. The same applies to the freedom of expression which
must be absolute. That does not mean again of course that I
agree with anti-Jews, antisemites, racists of any kind or
anti-Raelians. But by knowing your enemies or the enemies of
your values, you are better equipped to fight them. With love
and respect of course, and with the wonderful sentence of the
French philosopher Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you
say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
L'absence de virus dans ce courrier électronique a été vérifiée par le logiciel antivirus Avast.
www.avast.com