US ranks 12th in economic freedom – report

5 views
Skip to first unread message

selected by Rael

unread,
Jan 30, 2015, 4:22:59 AM1/30/15
to rael-s...@googlegroups.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://rt.com/usa/227247-us-economic-freedom-ranking/

US ranks 12th in economic freedom – report

Published time: January 29, 2015 04:11 
Edited time: January 29, 2015 05:04
Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

418160

The United States has ranked 12th in the world in economic freedom, according to an annual report compiled by the Heritage Foundation. The country remained out of the top 10, despite small improvements to its score.

The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think-tank, uses four categories to rank countries in its Economic Freedom Index – rule of law, limited government, regulatory efficiency, and open markets. The United States finally halted its five-year slide in the rankings by rising 0.7 points, retaining its No. 12 ranking among the world’s economies.

According to the report, the US improved its scoring in categories such as freedom from corruption, government spending, fiscal freedom, labor freedom, monetary freedom, and trade freedom.

The United States recorded modest gains in six of the 10 Index-measured freedoms, including control of government spending. But its tax and regulatory burdens have increased substantially, and it still has much work to do (in the area of business freedom, for example, which worsened last year) before it can regain a spot among the world’s 10 freest economies,” said the report.

Screenshot from www.heritage.org

Screenshot from www.heritage.org

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) spoke at the Heritage Foundation on Tuesday, unveiling the index. He said the improved score in government spending was due to Republicans’ influence in Congress.

The fact that our country received an uptick in our rating this year, and one of the reasons why we would see this uptick is because since we took over the House in 2011, we started cutting spending,” Ryan said.

“We started capping the kind that Congress is control of on an annual basis, discretionary spending, and so I think it’s noteworthy that because of a new Republican Congress that took over in 2011, we brought some temper to the out of control spending that was happening here in Washington and as a result, it made us more free,” he added. “That’s a good step in the right direction with many, many steps to follow.”

READ MORE: ‘National moral disgrace’: Over 1 in 5 US children on food stamps & living in poverty

The report also noted that when President Barack Obama took office in 2009, the United States ranked sixth in economic freedom, falling to 12th place over the course of his presidency. The report suggests that White House domestic policies are to blame, though it makes scant mention of the 2008 economic crisis that led to the great recession and the loss of 10 million full-time jobs.

The anemic post-recession recovery has been characterized by slow growth, high unemployment, a decrease in the number of Americans seeking work, and great uncertainty that has held back investment,” explains the report. “Increased tax regulatory burdens, aggravated by favoritism toward entrenched interests, have undercut America’s historically dynamic entrepreneurial growth.

READ MORE: Food stamp usage has quadrupled among US service members since ‘06

Leading the chart this year are Hong Kong, Singapore, and New Zealand. Hong Kong’s overall rating declined by 0.5 points over a “higher level of perceived corruption,” which trumped improvements in other categories. Last year, Hong Kong was the focus of a mass civilian protest against voting restrictions after Beijing announced it would vet candidates for the office of chief executive.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its
full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not
mean that I agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL"
means that I believe it is important for the people of this planet to
know about what people think or do, even when what they think or do is
completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected articles
in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in America praying
for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was stupid enough to believe
that I was supporting praying to change the weather. So, when I select
articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-Semitic, anti-Jewish, racist,
revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group or religion, or any
other stupid article, it does not mean that I support them. It just
means that it is important for all human beings to know about them.
Common sense, which is usually very good among our readers, is good
enough to understand that. When, like in the recent articles on drug
decriminalization, it is necessary to make it clearer, I add a comment,
which in this case was very clear: I support decriminalizing all drugs,
as it is stupid to throw depressed and sad people (as only depressed and
sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin their life with a criminal
record. That does not mean that there is any change to the Message which
says clearly that we must not use any drug except for medical purposes.
The same applies to the freedom of expression which must be absolute.
That does not mean again of course that I agree with anti-Jews,
anti-Semites, racists of any kind or anti-Raelians. But by knowing your
enemies or the enemies of your values, you are better equipped to fight
them. With love and respect of course, and with the wonderful sentence
of the French philosopher Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you
say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".


Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages