Facebook blocks messaging encryption service Crypter
Selected by Rael
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org
Get Rael-Science on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/raelscience
Source: https://www.rt.com/usa/331449-facebook-block-encry...
Facebook blocks messaging encryption service Crypter
After Crypter, an app developed by Sussex University student Max Mitchell, was touted by the likes of BGR and TechCrunchearlier this week, Facebook "clocked on" to the encryption service, effectively blocking the tool from use, according to Crypter.
"We will be working extremely hard on another way around, so still download the extension as an update will be pushed out automatically," Crypter's website says. "We at Crypter are really sorry about this."
So I asked the people/person behind https://t.co/j1v0hFjrlI a question. I am certain that this is safe.pic.twitter.com/c2vOlpZaf2
— Colin Keigherキヤー・コリン (@afreak) February 5, 2016
Crypter invited users to "give us a hand," via GitHub.
A plugin for Firefox and Chrome, according to TechCrunch, Crypter encrypts Facebook messages using a password that the two communicators agree upon. The password is used to encrypt a message on the sender side, creating ciphered text that is sent over Facebook's server, then used to locally decrypt the text on the receiver side.
Crypter's designers said the service was borne of concerns over the vulnerability of private messages from the prying eyes of private companies seeking to sell personal data for use in targeted advertising, and from government snoops that persecute or suppress protest incitement or other democratic speech.
"We had an 'if you can’t beat them, join them' attitude, to designing Crypter. Instead of inviting users to join a brand new chat application we decided to apply it to an already established one – Facebook. And at the same time making sure that we don’t interrupt with our users existing habits."
The move to block Crypter comes even as Facebook has spoken up against government decryption efforts, such as the Investigatory Powers Bill in the UK, which would allow security services to hack anyone’s device and access their web history. Facebook is among the many tech-sector voices that have opposed the US government's efforts to weaken encryption security for the benefit of law enforcement.
‘Don’t Panic’: Study pours cold water on police fears over encryptionhttps://t.co/ULh5z7qldUpic.twitter.com/rJZFyWq1mC
— RT America (@RT_America) February 2, 2016
While the Obama administration said in October that it would not compel tech companies to offer backdoor access, the White House said it would continue its efforts to informally pressure companies to create a way for the government to look at people’s data when they are under investigation. FBI Director James Comey is among the more vocal proponents of government backdoor access to encrypted data.
“The administration has decided not to seek a legislative remedy now, but it makes sense to continue the conversations with industry,” Comey told a Senate committee in October 2015.
Obama is now obliged to publicly address encryption https://t.co/XzqcFBli6Fpic.twitter.com/yERNA2QxZS
— RT America (@RT_America) October 29, 2015
A recent study found that encryption is not as indestructible as law enforcement in the US has claimed, and that policing agencies still have options in their attempts at thwarting privacy online.
Tech companies, shown to be ultimately complicit in the National Security Agency's global surveillance programs, have maintained a reformist stance regarding US surveillance policies, which they say undermine their products and consumer trust.
Facebook recently released a feature enabling Android users to browse the social media site using Tor’s anonymization methods.
WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not mean that I agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL" means that I believe it is important for the people of this planet to know about what people think or do, even when what they think or do is completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected articles in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in America praying for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was stupid enough to believe that I was supporting praying to change the weather. So, when I select articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-semitic, anti-Jewish, racist, revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group or religion, or any other stupid article, it does not mean that I support them. It just means that it is important for all human beings to know about them. Common sense, which is usually very good among our readers, is good enough to understand that. When, like in the recent articles on drug decriminalization, it is necessary to make it clearer, I add a comment, which in this case was very clear: I support decriminalizing all drugs, as it is stupid to throw depressed and sad people (as only depressed and sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin their life with a criminal record. That does not mean that there is any change to the Message which says clearly that we must not use any drug except for medical purposes. The same applies to the freedom of expression which must be absolute. That does not mean again of course that I agree with anti-Jews, antisemites, racists of any kind or anti-Raelians. But by knowing your enemies or the enemies of your values, you are better equipped to fight them. With love and respect of course, and with the wonderful sentence of the French philosopher Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".