Vegetarians have fewer, less-healthy sperm than meat-eaters – study
selected by Rael
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://rt.com/news/197896-vegetarians-sperm-quality-research/
Vegetarians have fewer, less-healthy sperm than meat-eaters – study
Vegetarian men may be harming their chances of conceiving children, a multi-year US study has revealed. Researchers believe the reasons may include vitamin deficiencies and the presence of female hormones in soy, which is popular among vegetarians.
Noting that Seventh-Day Adventists, members of a strict Protestant sect, live 10 years longer than average Americans, researchers at Loma Linda University, itself a Seventh-Day Adventist institution, hypothesized that diet was a possible reason. Many of the sect’s followers are encouraged to go vegetarian, as most meat is considered “unclean.”
For the experiment, researchers monitored 443 meat-eaters and 31 vegetarians and vegans between 2009 and 2013, initially assuming that the vegetarians’ sperm would be healthier, and a contributing factor to the longevity of their offspring.
But the results, to be published in Fertility and Sterility journal on Wednesday, came as a surprise.
“We found that diet does significantly affect sperm quality. Vegetarian and vegan diets were associated with much lower sperm counts than omnivorous diets,” said lead study author Eliza Orzylowska. “Although these people are not infertile, it is likely to play a factor in conception, particularly for couples who are trying to conceive naturally, the old-fashioned way.”
Vegetarians had 30 percent lower concentrations of sperm – 50 million per milliliter, versus 70 million per milliliter. Their motility - the vitality of the sperm – was also lower, with a third of sperm active, versus 60 percent for the meat eaters. Significantly, vegans fared worst of all.
Orzylowska believes that the reason could be soy, which was shown in a study three years ago to shrink the sperm count. The reason is a high content of phyto-estrogen, which mimics a female hormone, and impedes sperm production.
“For children who have grown up with those kind of diets, it may have impacted on sperm quality from puberty,” said Orzylowska.
“It’s hard to tell people not to be vegetarians if they are trying to conceive, but I would caution against using soy, at least for 74 days beforehand, which is the time it takes for sperm to be replaced.”
A second potential explanation put forward by Orzylowska is the shortage of B12, a vitamin that helps to break down estrogen, thus maintaining a high sperm count. With its highest concentrations found in beef and fish, many vegetarians who do not take supplements may be missing out.
Another parallel, but independent, longitudinal study conducted by Harvard scientists and published by the American Society for Reproductive medicine this week has identified pesticides as a potential cause of reduced fertility among vegetarians.
Between 2007 and 2012 the scientists studied the sperm of 155 men at the Massachusetts General Hospital, measured how much fruit they consumed, and whether those fruit came from areas with a high level of pesticide residue.
The quarter of men who consumed the most fruit and vegetables with a high pesticide residue had a 70 percent smaller count of motile sperm, and 64 percent smaller count of normally-shaped sperm than the quarter of men who consumed the least pesticide-tainted fruit and vegetables.
“Men who want to optimize their reproductive health need to take care take care to choose fruits and vegetables grown with lower levels of pesticides, which are less contaminated. Nutrition is important to good reproductive health, but food that is good for you can contain other substances, not so good for you,” commented Paul J. Turek, president of the Society for Male Reproduction and Infertility.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its
full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not
mean that I agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL"
means that I believe it is important for the people of this planet to
know about what people think or do, even when what they think or do is
completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected articles
in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in America praying
for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was stupid enough to believe
that I was supporting praying to change the weather. So, when I select
articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-Semitic, anti-Jewish, racist,
revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group or religion, or any
other stupid article, it does not mean that I support them. It just
means that it is important for all human beings to know about them.
Common sense, which is usually very good among our readers, is good
enough to understand that. When, like in the recent articles on drug
decriminalization, it is necessary to make it clearer, I add a comment,
which in this case was very clear: I support decriminalizing all drugs,
as it is stupid to throw depressed and sad people (as only depressed and
sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin their life with a criminal
record. That does not mean that there is any change to the Message which
says clearly that we must not use any drug except for medical purposes.
The same applies to the freedom of expression which must be absolute.
That does not mean again of course that I agree with anti-Jews,
anti-Semites, racists of any kind or anti-Raelians. But by knowing your
enemies or the enemies of your values, you are better equipped to fight
them. With love and respect of course, and with the wonderful sentence
of the French philosopher Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you
say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".