--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Python Pune" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pythonpune+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Python Pune" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pythonpune+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
"Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे" <manda...@gmail.com> writes:> *Only apply if you can put long hours in work,can work in night shifts,can
> I wonder how they find candidates when the first line of every (most?) job
> post on the blog starts with
>
> work on weekends and do not care about leaves. *
[...]
Hard to believe that they actually put that in writing on the site.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Shekhar Tiwatne <pyth...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday 26 July 2013 02:24 PM, Noufal Ibrahim wrote:interesting indeed.
"Mandar Vaze / मंदार वझे" <manda...@gmail.com> writes:
I wonder how they find candidates when the first line of every (most?) job[...]
post on the blog starts with
*Only apply if you can put long hours in work,can work in night shifts,can
work on weekends and do not care about leaves. *
Hard to believe that they actually put that in writing on the site.
I thought it's only for Infrastructure dev when I started reading the post however same is the criteria for product engineer.
They have same for HR as well (not bad ;) ).
They allow toy to choose your own work environment (2 Monitors, Mac) though... if you care.Though I'm sure we could discuss this for long, I think Mac is not the right criteria to apply. In fact if someone forced me to work on a Mac I would rather step away.
One month exposure to a Mac and its horribly difficult to debug internals left me completely disillusioned with it.
(BTW - after spending one month I had to give up the task because of the excessively difficulty in modifying the software stack due to lack of ability to compile from source - it is a baaaad platform imo).
On 26 Jul 2013 16:28, "atulDOTkhotATGmailDOTcom" <atul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > (BTW - after spending one month I had to give up the task because of
> > the excessively difficulty in modifying the software stack due to lack
> > of ability to compile from source - it is a baaaad platform imo).
>
> Forgive my ignorance w.r.t. mac - but isn't it yet another unix?
> OS X?
Its a Unix w/o source
>
> I somehow always thought it would be a command line - and same stuff -
> gcc installed - configure / make install thingy?
Let's say your WiFi card cannot connect to the router. Tough luck getting the source and recompile by adding debug statements. You don't get the source.
Moreover behaviour changes from version to version. So debugging gets even harder.
Osx is no different from most commercial OS'. But it becomes an unattractive platform for development. Especially when you want to write code that leverages underlying system services. And these services aren't stable enough.
I had wanted to leverage one such service which is not particularly widely used. But the experience to make it work and make it work across versions was harrowing. For exactly the same service the Linux code was readily available.
On 26 Jul 2013 16:28, "atulDOTkhotATGmailDOTcom" <atul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > (BTW - after spending one month I had to give up the task because of
> > the excessively difficulty in modifying the software stack due to lack
> > of ability to compile from source - it is a baaaad platform imo).
>
> Forgive my ignorance w.r.t. mac - but isn't it yet another unix?
> OS X?Its a Unix w/o source
>
> I somehow always thought it would be a command line - and same stuff -
> gcc installed - configure / make install thingy?Let's say your WiFi card cannot connect to the router. Tough luck getting the source and recompile by adding debug statements. You don't get the source.
Moreover behaviour changes from version to version. So debugging gets even harder.
Osx is no different from most commercial OS'. But it becomes an unattractive platform for development. Especially when you want to write code that leverages underlying system services. And these services aren't stable enough.
I had wanted to leverage one such service which is not particularly widely used. But the experience to make it work and make it work across versions was harrowing. For exactly the same service the Linux code was readily available.
I approved this by mistake, sorry about that.