Zach Davis
Pointwise®, Inc. Sr. Engineer, Sales & Marketing 213 South Jennings Avenue Fort Worth, TX 76104-1107 E: zach....@pointwise.com P: (817) 377-2807 x1202 F: (817) 377-2799 |
I was interested in running a compressible simulation with PyFR. The target Reynolds number would be 2.146e+06.
A p4 mesh would likely consist of around 15e+06 hexes.
Freddie’s spreadsheet, if I’m reading correctly, estimates a 3-D double-precision Navier-Stokes problem would require 3.7e+13 bytes or 35.2GiB of memory to run.
Again, correct me if I’m wrong, but if I recall the tilmestep should be somewhere between 1/p and 1/p^2 which would be between 0.25 and 0.0625 for a 4th order simulation.
Ideally, I would like to run this out to steady state.
AWS has p3 instances with 1, 4, and 8 NVIDIA V100 cards available each with 16GB of memory, 5120 CUDA cores, and 7TFLOPS of double-precision performance. Is this problem tractable in the latest PyFR release?
Does PyFR provide an inlet boundary condition where a total pressure and total temperature profile can be specified?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyFR Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pyfrmailingli...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to pyfrmai...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/pyfrmailinglist.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Zach Davis
Pointwise®, Inc. Sr. Engineer, Sales & Marketing 213 South Jennings Avenue Fort Worth, TX 76104-1107 E: zach....@pointwise.com P: (817) 377-2807 x1202 F: (817) 377-2799 |