Am 22.07.2012 02:33, schrieb
imag...@gmail.com:
> Eric, what do you like about SNS-HDR? From a quick read it's Windows
> only, and uses DCRAW, not clear if it can use TIFF's from other
> converters.
It can. I use some dedicated raw converter (previously DPP, now ACR
again) to convert to 16 bit TIFF - I never process raw directly in PTGui
or an HDR program since this spoils the benefits of shooting raw.
> It's also command line. But, what do you think it does
> better than the fusion in PTGui or others?
Yes, it is command line, which is a benefit. I use PTGui to align single
fisheye images from handheld bracketed shots - it does a far better job
than f.e. align_image_stack, since I can use viewpoint correction inside
PTGui (which is necessary most of the time, since the camera also moves
forward and backward if you shoot handheld or from a monopod). I did
this using PTGui exposure fusion previously.
Now I found out that I can use SNS-HDR lite in place of enblend as a
plugin to PTGui - the syntax is compatible. So I can use the batch
builder to batch align HDR stacks. I soon write a wiki page about the
procedure.
The benefits over enfuse include more vibrant colors, better local
contrast, better treatment of relatively small highlight regions (like
small windows) and better total highlights. All that without halos, same
as enfuse.
It has a limited de-ghosting feature which works reasonably well if
there isn't too much contrast. Moving leaves with other leaves as
background are treated well whereas moving leaves with sky background
aren't fixed. This feature works without the faint outlines that remain
f.e. in photomatix de-ghosting.
But there is a drawback, too: Very slight misalignments in low contrast
areas like moving clouds cause an annoying vertical banding and
sometimes posterization.