+1
--Larry Garfield
On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 4:16:24 PM CDT Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
> The REVIEW period for the proposed PSR-17, HTTP Message Factories, hit its
> minimum required duration on 2018-07-05. At this time, I am opening an
> ACCEPTANCE VOTE. Per the by-laws, the acceptance vote is limited to Core
> Committee members. The vote will close either at 23:59:59 UTC on
> 2018-08-01, or when all CC members have cast their vote, whichever comes
> earlier.
>
> The relevant materials are as follows:
>
>
> - Specification:
>
>
https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/be6dd60ea3bb24428eac661ee484c
> 09cc6d7a4d3/proposed/http-factory/http-factory.md - Meta Document:
>
>
https://github.com/php-fig/fig-standards/blob/be6dd60ea3bb24428eac661ee484c
> 09cc6d7a4d3/proposed/http-factory/http-factory-meta.md
>
>
> As required by the by-laws, we must demonstrate at least 2 implementations.
> The
> following all either implement and/or consume PSR-17:
>
>
> -
https://github.com/tuupola/http-factory does autodiscovery of the
> installed packages to determine _which_ PSR-7 implementation the PSR-17
> factories will return. This package is particularly interesting, as the
> author is not a member of the WG!
> -
https://github.com/http-interop/http-factory-diactoros,
> -
https://github.com/Nyholm/psr7 is also maintained by Tobias, and is both
> a PSR-7 implementation, as well as PSR-17 (using its own PSR-7
> implementations to back the factories).
> -
https://github.com/middlewares/utils is maintained by the WG's Oscar
> Otero, and consumes PSR-17 interfaces in order to expose static factory
> methods. It currently autodetects each of Diactoros, Guzzle, and Slim
> PSR-7 implementations in order to provide PSR-17 functionality
> out-of-the-box, but allows using any PSR-17 implementation.
>
>
> Additionally, we have already seen a lot of adoption under the current
> Interop\Http\Factory namespace:
>
>
> -
https://packagist.org/packages/http-interop/http-factory/dependents