Shortly said: .... Osmand should be available back as soon as possible.
The process of removal has been cancelled today, due to the fact that between both parties there has been some sort of consent if not 100% to the state of the original agreement for collaboration back in 2011.
Motives for the previous removal is the licensing of part of the copyrighted work (product logos, UI elements) without the knowledge and agreement of the author.
Main agreement included a permanent engagement into the project in exchange for a certain % share on the donations/income from the project and a passive access to view the amounts of donations in order to be fair and transparent with the collaborator on how the project evolves.
What was breached was the denial of the transparency on what and how much the actual income from donations/sales are, a week ago.
That fact made the awaited shares unpredictable and not transparent any more.
The replacement of the original graphics had been promised to be done 4 months ago by sharing the agreed % of the project´s income until that is done fully.
4 months later, no graphics had been changed officially, the promised % was balanced monthly, but the passive access to the income channel was cut off.
These are the facts around the management issues.
Hopefully all understand that such complaints, removal requests and publications are one of the last possibilities to find a fair solution, when the counter part refuses to communicate.
Best regards