Nature shift signals 'new era' of peer review transparency
Glenn Hampson
In case you missed this news---- https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/nature-shift-signals-new-era-peer-review-transparency
Rick Anderson
Interesting that authors get to choose whether or not to make the review reports public—this suggests that what will probably become transparent are the positive reports, while the negative ones will remain hidden from readers.
---
Rick Anderson
Assoc. Dean for Collections & Scholarly Communication
Marriott Library, University of Utah
Desk: (801) 587-9989
Cell: (801) 721-1687
--
As a public and publicly-funded effort, the conversations on this list can be viewed by the public and are archived. To read this group's complete listserv policy (including disclaimer and reuse information), please visit
http://osinitiative.org/osi-listservs.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Open Scholarship Initiative" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
osi2016-25+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osi2016-25/00e001d5e676%24df705cb0%249e511610%24%40nationalscience.org.
Glenn Hampson
…which leads to the question of whether the “omitted” reviewers still stand behind the reviewed paper. COPE looked at this case a few years ago and came up with a disclaimer solution--- https://publicationethics.org/case/reviewer-concerns-about-transparency-peer-review-process.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osi2016-25/A858533E-539C-4890-8679-0DA0AD8077B9%40utah.edu.