More on patents

[Schultz, Jack C.]

The tweet that triggered the discussion I just circulated about patents is here. Do you agree with the premise in paragraph 2?

  JACK 

Jack C. Schultz

jackcs...@gmail.com

@jackcschultz

https://schultzappel.wordpress.com

[Richard Poynder]

Hi Jack,

 

I have responded to your tweet here: https://twitter.com/RickyPo/status/897821779581906944

 

My main point: OA has primarily been driven by librarians, and librarians primary focus has always been on reducing costs. 

 

Best wishes,

 

 

Richard

 

--
As a public and publicly-funded effort, the conversations on this list can be viewed by the public and are archived. To read this group's complete listserv policy (including disclaimer and reuse information), please visit http://osinitiative.org/osi-listservs.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Open Scholarship Initiative" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osi2016-25+...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to osi20...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/osi2016-25.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

--

Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.co.uk

 

--

Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.co.uk

[Michael Eisen]

That's an "odd" view of the history of OA. 

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Richard Poynder <richard...@cantab.net> wrote:

Hi Jack,

 

I have responded to your tweet here: https://twitter.com/RickyPo/status/897821779581906944

 

My main point: OA has primarily been driven by librarians, and librarians primary focus has always been on reducing costs. 

 

Best wishes,

 

 

Richard

On 16 August 2017 at 14:42, Schultz, Jack C. <schu...@missouri.edu> wrote:

The tweet that triggered the discussion I just circulated about patents is here. Do you agree with the premise in paragraph 2?

 

 

 

  JACK 

 

Jack C. Schultz

jackcs...@gmail.com

@jackcschultz

https://schultzappel.wordpress.com

 

--

As a public and publicly-funded effort, the conversations on this list can be viewed by the public and are archived. To read this group's complete listserv policy (including disclaimer and reuse information), please visit http://osinitiative.org/osi-listservs.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Open Scholarship Initiative" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osi2016-25+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to osi20...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/osi2016-25.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

--

Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.co.uk

 

--

Richard Poynder
www.richardpoynder.co.uk

--

As a public and publicly-funded effort, the conversations on this list can be viewed by the public and are archived. To read this group's complete listserv policy (including disclaimer and reuse information), please visit http://osinitiative.org/osi-listservs.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Open Scholarship Initiative" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osi2016-25+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to osi20...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/osi2016-25.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--

Michael Eisen, Ph.D.
Investigator, Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Professor of Genetics, Genomics and Development

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
University of California, Berkeley

[Schultz, Jack C.]

Agreed

Sent from my iPhone

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osi2016-25+...@googlegroups.com.

[Joyce Ogburn]

In my work on principles, economic factors were only one of the principles listed even in the early days. See for example this excerpt from my chapter published last fall:

"Principles for Emerging Systems of Scholarly Publishing, known as the Tempe Principles, was issued in 2000. This set of principles resulted from a meeting sponsored by the Association of American Universities, the Association of Research Libraries, and the University Extending the Principles and Promise of Scholarly Communication of Kansas with the intent to “build consensus on a set of principles that could guide the transformation of the scholarly publishing system.” The participants tied “the creation, dissemination, and application of new knowledge” to “an informed citizenry and a healthy global economy.”viii The document identifies nine principles that urge action to deal with current issues of scholarly publishing. Principles cover containing the cost of publishing, electronic capabilities, the permanence of scholarly publications, and the evaluation of the quality of publications. Other principles call for achieving a better balance of copyright for owners and users, negotiating faculty rights favorable to ready use, reducing the time from submission to publication, assuring that quality of publications rather than quantity guide faculty evaluations, and protecting the privacy of the users of scholarly works."

Preprint here: https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/f/Ogburn_Joyce_2016_Extending_Promise_Scholarly_Comunication.pdf

The Tempe Principles precede by a couple of years the formal establishment of OA principles and definitions, but many of the principles remained the same.

Joyce

Joyce L. Ogburn

Appalachian State University

218 College Street

Boone NC 28608-2026

Lifelong learning requires lifelong access 

[Jo De]

Thanks for providing the background Joyce.  From my perspective, open access is a way to demarcate the types of new knowledge that are segregated.

Joann