In this TSK guest post (below), Naveen Zehra Minai describes how an expansion of open access may not, by itself, be sufficient to fully address the myriad access challenges faced by researchers from the “global south”---from overtaxed teaching schedules to inadequate conference travel funds to political challenges teaching sensitive topics. In addition, Dr. Minai further discounts OA’s potential based on her experience with an anthropology journal---her point being that making a journal open in terms of price/access doesn’t necessarily make it open in terms of bias/representation. The same vetting role journals perform in identifying worthy research can also be seen by some as a gatekeeping role that maintains power and authority structures.
From: The Scholarly Kitchen <in...@sspnet.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2018 4:51 AM
To: gham...@nationalscience.org
Subject: Today on The Scholarly Kitchen
|
If you would prefer not to receive daily alerts from The Scholarly Kitchen, go here.