Public Domain Concordance
evstevemd
Is there anywhere I can get SQL friendly data for public domain
concordance like KJV's?
Any other concordance/pointers to data is appreciated
evstevemd
Stefano
Weston Ruter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Scriptures" group.
To post to this group, send email to openscr...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openscripture...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openscriptures?hl=en.
--
Butrus Damaskus
> Do you mean Strong's concordance? I seem to remember someone putting Strongs
> into SQLite; you may search the archives here for that.
I don't understand how strong numbers could help creating a concordance.
Weston Ruter
evstevemd
Strong's Lexicon.
One more question: Should I search archives in this group or in OS
Git?
On Apr 19, 9:53 am, Weston Ruter <westonru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Strong's is in fact a concordance for KJV:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong%27s_concordance
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Weston Ruter <westonru...@gmail.com>
> LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/westonruter>-
> Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/westonruter> -
> Google+<https://plus.google.com/u/0/113853198722136596993/about>
Weston Ruter
evstevemd
are you talking about that Lexicon?
I'm finding a Concordance that takes a word and lists scriptures,
something like
http://www.godrules.net/library/topics/topic1.htm
God bless you
Stefano
Robert Rouse
CSV format: http://soulliberty.com/MetaV/Downloads/txt/Strongs.csv
SQLLite (bzip’d file – you’ll need to unzip it): http://nathan.smithfam.info/files/strongs.sqlite.bz2 - from Nathan Smith following up on an earlier thread here, which is what I used to make the CSV file.
Both of those draw from the data put on GitHub by David Troidl, which is here: https://github.com/openscriptures/strongs. If you also need to correlate the Strong’s data file with the words in the KJV, you can do that with SQL-type queries using the data I’ve put here: http://soulliberty.com/metav-downloads
evstevemd
I appreciate that and may God bless you
Stefano
On Apr 19, 3:08 pm, Robert Rouse <soullibe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Below are links to some files that have Strong’s Concordance in SQL-friendly formats:
>
> CSV format:http://soulliberty.com/MetaV/Downloads/txt/Strongs.csv
Butrus Damaskus
> Strong's is in fact a concordance for
> KJV: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong%27s_concordance
No, it isn't. In theory it is a concordance for the "original
languages". Practically it is a nonsense...
Seth Washeck
Seth Washeck
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 1:07:21 PM UTC-6, evstevemd wrote:
Kahunapule Michael Johnson
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Scriptures" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/openscriptures/-/rhLcSXI0UjsJ.
John Dyer
Seth Washeck
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 8:50:27 PM UTC-6, John Dyer wrote:
Also, check out http://openenglishbible.org/ for a free english text.
JD
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson <Kahun...@ebible.org> wrote:
http://eBible.org/web/ is Public Domain and modern English...
On 04/19/2012 10:37 AM, Seth Washeck wrote:
If there's an permissively-licensed English text, I'd be happy to index that as well.
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 1:07:21 PM UTC-6, evstevemd wrote:Hi,--
Is there anywhere I can get SQL friendly data for public domain
concordance like KJV's?
Any other concordance/pointers to data is appreciated
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Scriptures" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/openscriptures/-/rhLcSXI0UjsJ.
To post to this group, send email to openscriptures@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openscriptures+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/openscriptures?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Scriptures" group.
To post to this group, send email to openscriptures@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to openscriptures+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
evstevemd
On Apr 20, 5:50 am, John Dyer <johnd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, check outhttp://openenglishbible.org/for a free english text.
> JD
>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson <
>
> --
> John Dyer -http://j.hn/
kri...@gmail.com
https://sourceforge.net/projects/scripture/files/Bible_Content You can find some data here.
Seth Washeck
kri...@gmail.com
The following were of mystics, and also of gnostics. (Now found as sinai and vatican doctrines)
ancestors of alexandrian (Socalled lost, but very few) ->Papyrus 66
200AD ->Papyrus 75 200AD ->Codex B 4th cent ->Codex Aleph 4th
cent ->RV 1881 ->ASV 1901 ->RSV 1946 ->New English Bible
1961
Ancestors of western family (very few manuscripts) ->Old latin version 2nd cent ->Latin Vulgate 4th cent ->Codex D 5th or 6th cent ->Codex D2 6th cent ->Codex E2 7th cent ->Douay rheims 1582 ->good news bible
LEB yet another result of this, check out these following/how the
future for it is (yet not fully, but I'm sure it will be introduced into
the world very widely), now we can see the preview of it (removed
verses):
.Mat 17:21 leb .Mat 17:21 leb .Mat 18:11 leb .Mat 23:14 leb .Mar 7:16
leb .Mar 9:44 leb .Mar 9:46 leb .Mar 11:26 leb .Mar 15:28 leb .Luk 17:36
leb .Luk 23:17 leb .Joh 5:4 leb .Act 28:29 leb
Origen, being a textual critic, is supposed to have corrected numerous portions of the sacred manuscripts. Evidence to the contrary shows he changed them to agree with his own human philosophy of mystical and allegorical ideas. Thus, though deceptive scholarship of this kind, certain manuscripts became corrupt. Les Garret, 1982. Witch Bible Can We Trust? Christian Centre Press p.16
"We need to understand, that many of the new translations are taken from old manuscripts. People think that these are more reliable. In actual fact they are saying, that a manuscript found in a waste paper basket in a cave in MT. Sinai and questionable manuscripts from Alexandria in Egypt, are more reliable than the Received Text." Les Garret, 1982. Witch Bible Can We Trust? Christian Centre Press p.15
How and why will we more likely consider these following below: ? They are plenty, not hidden, nor mystic.
Lost manuscripts of the traditional texts (thousands of manuscripts) Every bible before 1914 ->Peshitta Syriac 2nd cent. ->Gothic Version 4th cent ->Codex W(matthew) 4 or 5th cent ->Codex A(gospels) 5th cent ->The vast majority of extant New testament Manuscripts ->kjv 1611
Tydale used the Receieved Text in his Bible and said to the Pope: "If
God spare my life, before many years i will cause a boy that drieth a
plough to know more of the Scriptures than thou doest."
Another important remark, removing most verses as most modern bible versions does, takes away more of the ability of people actually hearing the complete spirit of what the bible holds. Do we give other humans the ability to judge whats right and wrong when they never hear about it?. Of course this is well known how the modern bible companies work.
If you would like to know more, let me know. There is videos on the subject, and much more.
jacqueline...@gmail.com
Tahor SuiJuris Ben
Tahor SuiJuris Ben Beriyth
Ahayahyashayadah
h1961 h3467 h3034
Proverbs 15:32
A MANDATORY verbal "confession" in sequence Colossians 3:17 / John 14:6 / John 6:44
http://literateaspects.com(under construction)
Acts 17:26, 27 / Judges 2:3, 22
•a TIMElimitfor all to SEEK•
Deuteronomy 4:28, 29 / Isaiah 55:6, 7
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> I am looking to buy a old concordance but i want it to be at least 100 years old
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Open Scriptures" group.
> To post to this group, send email to openscr...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/openscriptures.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
jonathon
> I am looking to buy a old concordance but i want it to be at least 100 years old
https://archive.org/details/crudenscompletec00crud/page/n6
https://archive.org/details/holybiblecontain00brow/page/n945
https://archive.org/details/newconcordancedi00butt/page/n8
jonathon
Tahor SuiJuris Ben
Would you appreciate an example?
Tahor SuiJuris Ben Beriyth
Ahayahyashayadah
h1961 h3467 h3034
Proverbs 15:32
A MANDATORY verbal "confession" in sequence Colossians 3:17 / John 14:6 / John 6:44
http://literateaspects.com(under construction)
Acts 17:26, 27 / Judges 2:3, 22
•a TIMElimitfor all to SEEK•
Deuteronomy 4:28, 29 / Isaiah 55:6, 7
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
jonathon
> Would it be prudent to have specific reasoning for a choice outside of age?
Other than a concordance for a translation published, or distributed by
a specific religious group, who has a habit of editing their material,
to remove failed prophecies, and theories that their own scholars have
discredited, digital copies are usually easier to work with.
If you are studying material of one of those groups, get your wallet
out, because you'll need first editions, galley proofs, and advance
reading copies. You'll also need the providence of the specific book
that you acquire. (Thank Mark Hoffman for that necessity.)
#####
For digital Bibles that I want/need a concordance, I export the specific
translation to plain text, then run a couple of scripts to create the
concordance.
jonathon