I'm forwarding this responce from the LAMMPS mailing list just to have its
information recorded on the OpenKIM list too.
Thanks to Axel for the helpful information.
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 23:41:13
From: Axel Kohlmeyer <
akoh...@gmail.com>
To: Ryan S. Elliott <
ell...@aem.umn.edu>
Cc: LAMMPS Users Mailing List
Subject: Re: [lammps-users] Is there a need for KIM API support on Windows via Cygwin
dear ryan,
i am answering here on the LAMMPS list, because my comments to your
inquiry are LAMMPS specific and not primarily related to the API
itself.
- if you want to reach serious windows programmers, you should aim for
compatibility with VC++, not cygwin.
- the precompiled LAMMPS binaries provided on
rpm.lammps.org - and
which are by now likely the most popular way to use LAMMPS on windows
- are built with MinGW64, which seems more up-to-date and produces
faster executables.
- the majority of people who use LAMMPS on windows, use precompiled
binaries, but the precompiled binaries currently cannot contain
OpenKIM support due to the incompatibility of the OpenKIM license with
the GPLv2 attached to LAMMPS
cheers,
axel.