Sgitheach web page update

83 views
Skip to first unread message

Grahame Marsh

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 8:51:10 AM12/11/12
to neoni...@googlegroups.com
Hi

I have added a webpage where I test a variety of other small CRTs with
the scope clock 2 hardware.

http://www.sgitheach.org.uk/scope2a.html

This page will continue to carry updates as I trial other CRTs and other
PSU configurations. I'm still extending the range of clock faces and
adding multi language support.

The rubidium oscillator clock workover is completed and the designs are
all here. The complete software including the source code written using
the free GCC -AVR C complier is available for download.

http://www.sgitheach.org.uk/atomic.html

The Giant 7 "Jon Ellis" Segment Clock page now has the software (again
GCC-AVR) available for download.

http://www.sgitheach.org.uk/ss.html

Cheers Grahame

Dekatron42

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 1:12:02 PM12/11/12
to neoni...@googlegroups.com, graham...@googlemail.com
Wonderful as always!
 
/Martin

kay486

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 1:41:53 PM12/11/12
to neoni...@googlegroups.com, graham...@googlemail.com
love it! I always wanted to make a scope clock, but i wasnt sure what scope looks the best, there arent any databases of scopes that would have pictures of glowing tubes (atleast im not aware of any, if somebody knows such a site, let me know please!)

Michel

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 4:15:27 PM12/11/12
to neonixie-l
Great design and source of information Graham! Fantastic.

Just wondering about 1 thing, is it possible to adjust the brightness
of the scopeclock according to the ambient light? Usually you would
use the control grid of course, but what it you would adjust the
current through the filament? It would both lower the power
consumption and increase the life of the tube, I would expect?

The IN9 / IN13 bargraph clock is my next project!! Tubes are on the
way but hope I will have some time to work on it :-)

Michel



On Dec 12, 12:51 am, Grahame Marsh <grahame.ma...@googlemail.com>
wrote:

JohnK

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 4:25:24 PM12/11/12
to neoni...@googlegroups.com
Valve [tube] filaments [heaters/cathodes in this case] generally do not have
life extended by running lower power.
Cathode emission is complex and heater should be run within the specs. That
spec is not just to achieve maximum rated emission.

Some oscilloscopes had a connection for cathode modulation of brightness.

John K.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"neonixie-l" group.
To post to this group, send an email to neoni...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
neonixie-l+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Grahame Marsh

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 4:25:47 PM12/11/12
to neoni...@googlegroups.com
Michel

Ambient light based brightess control is something I have been playing
with. I remember, as a nipper, we had a valve B&W TV set with a LDR in
the front panel so it had a sort of "automatic" brightess control.

But I would certainly do the control by varying the grid voltage wrt the
cathode not by varying the heater/cathode temperature. My
understanding, although I don't know the physics involved, is that is
bad to underrun a heater. Overrunning is perhaps more obviously wrong.
The main problem I have at the moment is that as the beam current is
varied it pulls the focus off, adjust the brightness, adjust the
focus... I've not gone far enough into finding out whether its the true
CRT charactertics that are doing it or my crap PSU being pulled around :(

Cheers Grahame

Oscilloclock

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 5:32:23 AM12/12/12
to neoni...@googlegroups.com
Wow, wow, wow!!

Grahame, I think if you are varying the grid current well within the design range and you see focus vary significantly enough to notice, you have a PSU problem.

Either you aren't supplying the right voltage to the anode, the deflection plates are not at the right potential (in many tubes, X and Y plates should be at slightly different potentials w.r.t. cathode due to their placement along the neck of the tube), or your PSU is not regulating well (not able to supply enough current).

I would measure all the voltages while you vary the grid bias and see if anything changes significantly.

(Of course, even professional oscilloscopes and X-Y monitors exhibit this focus change to some degree, at extreme intensities.)

(My <a href="http://oscilloclock.com/protoype ">Prototype</a> has this problem in a big way, due to the super poor job I did winding my own transformer!

Aaron

Grahame Marsh

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 6:14:25 AM12/12/12
to neoni...@googlegroups.com
Hi Aaron

You've confirmed what I suspected, that the focus voltage is moving
enough to unfocus the image as the beam current is varying. I will take
some measurements of beam current, focus current, focus and cathode
voltages and try to feed the focus from a more stable voltage, perhaps
using a mosfet in the control rather than the simple potential divider.
The aim is automatic brightness control, probably not using the LDR in
the grid circuit directly but using another DAC (or PWM) to control grid
voltage and hence brightness. The LDR would be read by the AVR and
acted on. Brightness control by the AVR is something I'm working
towards so I can try to draw any object, no matter how big, only once
rather than drawing larger objectes many times to achieve equal
brightness with small objects.

I have the final anode voltage set at the midpoint voltage on the
deflection amplifiers. So a centred undeflected spot has
D1=D1'=D2=D2'=A3 voltage. I can trim the A3 voltage for best
astigmatism which I have found is slightly off the equal voltage rule, I
guess because one set of deflection plates are further down the tube as
you say. But I have not tried varying the voltages on the deflection
plates so D1=D1' != D2=D2' for a centred spot. The deflection
amplifiers are identical and fully interchangable at the moment.

Of course, I've not yet progressed to CRTs with a PDA.

Another change I'm planning to try is the way the octant information is
sent to the blanking circuits. At the moment I hae an 8 bit bus
straight from one AVR into a second that carries out the blanking
decisions. This is just like yours and Davids done in discrete logic
ICs. I'm going to use the SPI bus to serially send the data to the
second AVR. There are a couple of advantages, it frees up a lot of pins
on the main AVR that I can use for other things, but also the data sent
is then not limited to 8 bits. It become easy to, for example send 16
blanking bits and so a circle can be divided up into 16ths rather than
8ths. It does look like there is time to do this easily in the object
drawing cycle. The second AVR become a SPI slave and any data can be
sent to it.

My test trafo has been shipped from the USA and I'm hoping it'll be with
me before xmas so I can build and test the new PSU. Working towards
Scope Clock 2 Version 2 with ideas building for Scope Clock 3 (as
above). I also want to build and case a clock for the house so I have
something to show.

Sent one set of PCBs to the states, another set are promised. A guy on
Malta has asked me for a set, you can see is collection of CRTs and
radio equipment here

http://www.qrz.com/db/9H1GT

But I'm waiting for the new PSU before supplying my home made PCBs. All
good fun.

Cheers Grahame
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages