Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

4th Meeting Report

10 views
Skip to first unread message

Raniere Silva

unread,
Mar 14, 2014, 6:51:25 PM3/14/14
to dev-tec...@lists.mozilla.org
I just published the report about yesterday meeting:
http://blog.rgaiacs.com/2014/03/13/4th_mathml_meeting.html.
If I forgot to mention your work, please get in touch and sorry
about that in advance.

To try make the meeting suitable for the large amount of people we are running a
survey: http://mathml.limequery.com/index.php/396944/lang-en.

Thanks,
Raniere

Frédéric Wang

unread,
Mar 15, 2014, 7:24:51 AM3/15/14
to
Thank you Raniere.

Just one correction: the <x-tex> custom element
(https://github.com/fred-wang/x-tex) is currently implemented via the
X-tag polyfill (http://x-tags.org/) which does not use shadow DOM.
However, teoli said shadow DOM is implemented in Gecko 30 and that the
custom element spec will allow to just name the element <tex> so this
could be improved in the future. At the moment that's mostly a proof of
concept. As a concrete example,

TeXelement = document.createElement("x-tex");
TeXelement.textContent = "x^2 + y^2";

is not equivalent to

<x-tex>x^2 + y^2</x-tex>

(https://github.com/fred-wang/x-tex/issues/3).
--
Frédéric Wang
MathML Crowdfunding: ulule.com/mathematics-ebooks

Frédéric Wang

unread,
Mar 15, 2014, 7:27:50 AM3/15/14
to
And BTW, someone willing to learn more about Web components, shadow DOM
etc can try to improve this <x-tex> element, without using any polyfill
library.

Le 15/03/2014 12:24, Frédéric Wang a écrit :
> Thank you Raniere.
>
> Just one correction: the <x-tex> custom element
> (https://github.com/fred-wang/x-tex) is currently implemented via the
> X-tag polyfill (http://x-tags.org/) which does not use shadow DOM.
> However, teoli said shadow DOM is implemented in Gecko 30 and that the
> custom element spec will allow to just name the element <tex> so this
> could be improved in the future. At the moment that's mostly a proof of
> concept. As a concrete example,
>
> TeXelement = document.createElement("x-tex");
> TeXelement.textContent = "x^2 + y^2";
>
> is not equivalent to
>
> <x-tex>x^2 + y^2</x-tex>
>
> (https://github.com/fred-wang/x-tex/issues/3).
>

Raniere Silva

unread,
Mar 16, 2014, 6:18:01 AM3/16/14
to dev-tec...@lists.mozilla.org
Thanks for the correction. I already update the post.
0 new messages