Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

4th Meeting Report

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Raniere Silva

unread,
Mar 14, 2014, 6:51:25 PM3/14/14
to dev-tec...@lists.mozilla.org
I just published the report about yesterday meeting:
http://blog.rgaiacs.com/2014/03/13/4th_mathml_meeting.html.
If I forgot to mention your work, please get in touch and sorry
about that in advance.

To try make the meeting suitable for the large amount of people we are running a
survey: http://mathml.limequery.com/index.php/396944/lang-en.

Thanks,
Raniere

Frédéric Wang

unread,
Mar 15, 2014, 7:24:51 AM3/15/14
to
Thank you Raniere.

Just one correction: the <x-tex> custom element
(https://github.com/fred-wang/x-tex) is currently implemented via the
X-tag polyfill (http://x-tags.org/) which does not use shadow DOM.
However, teoli said shadow DOM is implemented in Gecko 30 and that the
custom element spec will allow to just name the element <tex> so this
could be improved in the future. At the moment that's mostly a proof of
concept. As a concrete example,

TeXelement = document.createElement("x-tex");
TeXelement.textContent = "x^2 + y^2";

is not equivalent to

<x-tex>x^2 + y^2</x-tex>

(https://github.com/fred-wang/x-tex/issues/3).
--
Frédéric Wang
MathML Crowdfunding: ulule.com/mathematics-ebooks

Frédéric Wang

unread,
Mar 15, 2014, 7:27:50 AM3/15/14
to
And BTW, someone willing to learn more about Web components, shadow DOM
etc can try to improve this <x-tex> element, without using any polyfill
library.

Le 15/03/2014 12:24, Frédéric Wang a écrit :
> Thank you Raniere.
>
> Just one correction: the <x-tex> custom element
> (https://github.com/fred-wang/x-tex) is currently implemented via the
> X-tag polyfill (http://x-tags.org/) which does not use shadow DOM.
> However, teoli said shadow DOM is implemented in Gecko 30 and that the
> custom element spec will allow to just name the element <tex> so this
> could be improved in the future. At the moment that's mostly a proof of
> concept. As a concrete example,
>
> TeXelement = document.createElement("x-tex");
> TeXelement.textContent = "x^2 + y^2";
>
> is not equivalent to
>
> <x-tex>x^2 + y^2</x-tex>
>
> (https://github.com/fred-wang/x-tex/issues/3).
>

Raniere Silva

unread,
Mar 16, 2014, 6:18:01 AM3/16/14
to dev-tec...@lists.mozilla.org
Thanks for the correction. I already update the post.
0 new messages