On 8/15/16 1:57 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> Why doesn't this just go on Element, like .className and .id?
If you think it should, and can convince Blink and Edge to do that, we
could do it from a technical point of view.
From a theoretical point of view, it doesn't seem like as generic a
concept as className/id, not least because it effectively reserves a
whole bunch of attribute names that may already be in use in random XML
dialects. I guess this is the reason why we would want these less on
"whatever". MathML doesn't have this problem, of course.
-Boris